|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

10-08-2012, 02:31 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: santa barbara, CA
Posts: 1,681
|
|
increased fuel flow with decreasing altitude
I have read more than once in columns by Mike Busch and others how one generally must enrichen fuel flow when descending so as to compensate for the denser air that would otherwise result in a mixture that becomes too lean. However, with my constant speed IO-360B1B (AFP system) I have without exception observed that, without touching any controls, my fuel flow goes UP when descending. Why the discrepancy from what the wise men say? Is the AFP system self-compensating here?
thanks
erich
|

10-08-2012, 02:48 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 236
|
|
Erich - I am assuming your manifold pressure is increasing as you descend - just like opening the throttle further would - which will cause your fuel flow to increase.
I see the same thing in my airplane.
__________________
Mark Olson
RV-7A First flight 2005 Sold 2019
F1-EVO Rocket First flight 2010
|

10-08-2012, 05:19 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,499
|
|
I leave my mixture right where it was at cruise. I maintain my cruise speed during descent. I set prop to 2100 rpm. I pull throttle no more than 2" mp at a time to prevent shock cooling and to keep power below 65%. I don't touch the mixture until within a few miles of airport unless engine gets rough. If cht's gets near 250F in cool weather, I will enrichen/add some power as needed to remain at or above 250F. I try to start descents a little farther out in cool wx.
__________________
Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
|

10-08-2012, 10:40 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brisbane Qld. Aust.
Posts: 2,271
|
|
Gents, you are not thinking outside the Lycoming / bendix square.
On the typical RV setup with a Bendix style fuel delivery system, or a carboy, as the mass airflow increases the fuel delivery almost follows perfectly. Sometimes the subtle differences mean a small tweek of the mixture once on descent.
I often leave FL130-150 and do not touch a thing until at the hangar door.
Now.....try doing this on a TCM/CMI engine in say a Bonanza! The fuel delivery is proportional to the fuel pump which is driven by the crankshaft, so while you descend, the engine goes leaner and leaner, and perhaps it may get to the point where the fire goes out, so the little red knob needs a bit more tweeking on the way down.
Does that help? 
__________________
______________________________
David Brown
DYNON Authorised Dealer and Installer
The two best investments you can make, by any financial test, an EMS and APS!
|

10-09-2012, 12:00 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: santa barbara, CA
Posts: 1,681
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne Gillispie
I leave my mixture right where it was at cruise. I maintain my cruise speed during descent. I set prop to 2100 rpm. I pull throttle no more than 2" mp at a time to prevent shock cooling and to keep power below 65%. I don't touch the mixture until within a few miles of airport unless engine gets rough. If cht's gets near 250F in cool weather, I will enrichen/add some power as needed to remain at or above 250F. I try to start descents a little farther out in cool wx.
|
Hmmm. Not sure how this is responding to my question.
Erich
|

10-09-2012, 02:55 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brisbane Qld. Aust.
Posts: 2,271
|
|
But mine did perfectly..... do I win the chocky frog???

__________________
______________________________
David Brown
DYNON Authorised Dealer and Installer
The two best investments you can make, by any financial test, an EMS and APS!
|

10-09-2012, 04:52 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,499
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne Gillispie
I leave my mixture right where it was at cruise. I maintain my cruise speed during descent. I set prop to 2100 rpm. I pull throttle no more than 2" mp at a time to prevent shock cooling and to keep power below 65%. I don't touch the mixture until within a few miles of airport unless engine gets rough. If cht's gets near 250F in cool weather, I will enrichen/add some power as needed to remain at or above 250F. I try to start descents a little farther out in cool wx.
|
Sorry for surrounding it with other operational jargon. Now, can I have my choky frog?
__________________
Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
|

10-09-2012, 05:17 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brisbane Qld. Aust.
Posts: 2,271
|
|
__________________
______________________________
David Brown
DYNON Authorised Dealer and Installer
The two best investments you can make, by any financial test, an EMS and APS!
|

10-09-2012, 08:59 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
Posts: 908
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by erich weaver
I have read more than once in columns by Mike Busch and others how one generally must enrichen fuel flow when descending so as to compensate for the denser air that would otherwise result in a mixture that becomes too lean. However, with my constant speed IO-360B1B (AFP system) I have without exception observed that, without touching any controls, my fuel flow goes UP when descending. Why the discrepancy from what the wise men say? Is the AFP system self-compensating here?
thanks
erich
|
I?ll take a stab at it, I have Bendix injection. The fuel servo is set up to get leaner as you retard the throttle so if you?re cruising at 10k and 22? let?s say LOP at 7gph. Now your descending, if you don?t retard the throttle as you descend I would expect the FF to increase as the manifold pressure increases, however if you retard the throttle to maintain no more than your original 22? the mixture will get leaner and FF will decrees. If you are retarding the throttle wile descending at some point during this decent I would expect the mixture to get lean enough so that the engine begins getting ruff at this point nudging the mixture in a bit will smooth it out but your still LOP.
Don?t know if this answers your question but I took a stab at least. 
|

10-09-2012, 09:48 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,499
|
|
So far, desending from 13,500' to 1,500' pattern altitude my engine has not ran rough. I really thought it would. But then I compare where I have it during taxi and there is not much difference. Possibly because I am occasionally pulling the throttle out. Also by setting 2100 rpm, I am giving the fuel air mixture more time to burn. I am not an engine expert, but that is my best guess.
__________________
Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20 AM.
|