VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-23-2012, 06:56 PM
drmax drmax is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Martinsville, IN
Posts: 470
Default 0-320 with 160HP upgrade?

Hello. I've recently ran onto a 6 with an o-320 e2d that was upgraded with larger pistons and now 160HP. Just curious as what this does to the existing parts within the engine, as in, how well do they handle the additional torques and stresses? I'm green with this, as to why I ask. Last thing I want, is to buy someone elses problems. Since major, the eng has 1150 and it's turning a m/t comp. fixed prop. Thx for any info/advice. DM
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-23-2012, 07:17 PM
Sid Lambert Sid Lambert is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Atlanta
Posts: 1,120
Default

Lycoming makes pretty much the exact 160 hp 320 still. The TBO is still 2000.
__________________
Sid Lambert

RV-7 Sold
RV-4 - Flying - O-320 Fixed Pitch - Red over Yellow

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-23-2012, 07:18 PM
jrs14855 jrs14855 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lake Havasu City AZ
Posts: 2,391
Default UPGRADE

The E series had plain steel cylinders vs Nitride on factory 160 hp. The certified upgrades to 160 hp require either Nitride, chrome or nickel cylinders. Lots of 160 upgrades on EAB with plain steel cylinders. The front main bearing configuration doesn't matter unless you are planning to change to a constant speed prop. Mosty of the E series have 0 235 front main which will not support a constant speed. A few have the two piece front main which will support the constant speed if the engine is set up to accomodate a governor.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-23-2012, 07:37 PM
drmax drmax is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Martinsville, IN
Posts: 470
Post ok

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrs14855 View Post
The E series had plain steel cylinders vs Nitride on factory 160 hp. The certified upgrades to 160 hp require either Nitride, chrome or nickel cylinders. Lots of 160 upgrades on EAB with plain steel cylinders. The front main bearing configuration doesn't matter unless you are planning to change to a constant speed prop. Mosty of the E series have 0 235 front main which will not support a constant speed. A few have the two piece front main which will support the constant speed if the engine is set up to accomodate a governor.
So it sound pretty much a normal procedure, providing a worthy shop did the repair and all is documented. I think the compressions are all at mid 70's and not using much oil. It is regulary run. I think the secret to longevity is "run the **** outta them"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-23-2012, 08:42 PM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default

Going to 160 hp is accomplished by installing 8.5:1 pistons.
I installed 9.5:1 pistons in my E3D. I have over 800 hrs since overhaul and it still runs great. I've had absolutely no problems.
The E3D is basically the same engine as the E2D except that some E2Ds didn't have the fuel pump.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-24-2012, 03:17 AM
NickAir's Avatar
NickAir NickAir is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: McMinnville, Oregon: HOME of the SPRUCE GOOSE
Posts: 540
Default 160 hp

Changing to higher comp 160hp pistons is the standard and usually done on a rebuild of most O-320 150 hp engines.

The Negitive of higher comp pistons (9.5:1/10.5:1) is that you then will be limited from using Mogas. You will need to use 100LL avgas.

The positive: The 160 hp configuration will actually run more efficiently. do it.
__________________
Tailwinds...

Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Leonardo Da Vinci

Working on a RV-4
Citabria 7GCBC
Cessna 180
RV7 I0-360 C/S, Slider, AP, Glass, etc. sold.
RV6 O-320 F/P, Slider, AP, Steam, etc., sold
Citabria 7KCAB rental
Piper Cherokee, sold
Sparrowhawk, sold

Proud -VAF- Supporter - Exempt, Dues Paid Anyway.

Last edited by NickAir : 07-24-2012 at 12:01 PM. Reason: Clarification
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-24-2012, 04:26 AM
gasman gasman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sonoma County
Posts: 3,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickAir View Post
Changing to higher comp 160 hp pistons is the standard and usually done on a rebuild of most O-320 150 hp engines.

The negitive is that you then will be limited from using Mogas. You will need to use 100LL avgas.

The positive: The 160 hp configuration will actually run more efficiently. do it.
I have found this to be not true.
__________________
VAF #897 Warren Moretti
2019 =VAF= Dues PAID
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-24-2012, 04:45 AM
Kyle Boatright Kyle Boatright is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gasman View Post
I have found this to be not true.
Agree. Several of the RV's at my home field with 8.5:1 compression engines (0-320's and 0-360's) use mogas.
__________________
Kyle Boatright
Marietta, GA
2001 RV-6 N46KB
2019(?) RV-10
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-24-2012, 11:57 AM
NickAir's Avatar
NickAir NickAir is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: McMinnville, Oregon: HOME of the SPRUCE GOOSE
Posts: 540
Default Hi comp pistons vs Mogas

I have been advised by professionals, the following:

High comp pistons in a O-320/O-360 (9.5:1 or 10:5:1) not recommended for low octane Mogas.

(8.5:1 is ok for Mogas) I did this for years and still do with good results.
__________________
Tailwinds...

Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Leonardo Da Vinci

Working on a RV-4
Citabria 7GCBC
Cessna 180
RV7 I0-360 C/S, Slider, AP, Glass, etc. sold.
RV6 O-320 F/P, Slider, AP, Steam, etc., sold
Citabria 7KCAB rental
Piper Cherokee, sold
Sparrowhawk, sold

Proud -VAF- Supporter - Exempt, Dues Paid Anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-24-2012, 01:14 PM
WAM120RV WAM120RV is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Coventry. England
Posts: 614
Default Gudgeon pins

Have done this with mine...... make sure it has the thick walled gudgeon pins (wrist pins).
__________________
http://www.aerobuilder.blogspot.com


Steve Arnold
England

In completion stage of Loehle P5151
Built and now Flying G.BVLR Vans RV4
Rebuilt G.BDBD Tailwind
Rebuilt G BVTN Kitfox
Built G CDCD RV9A with WAM120
Riveted wings on Glastar G.LEZZ Now (G. SKUA)
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.