VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-13-2012, 04:24 PM
JBSmitty JBSmitty is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2
Default New Builder Question-Basics

Hello all,

I am working on the Horizontal Stabilizer on a RV-8, and have a very basic question.

The instructions say to dimple the spars using a pneumatic or hand squeezer and the skins with a C-Frame, which I have done. (My micrometer tells me that they are both .0325")

Prior to riveting, I thought I would double check my work and cleco a spar to the skin, and what I see is that the dimples seem to sit flush in each other, but now I can see in certain locations where the skin does not sit perfectly flat on the spar in between the dimpled holes. Is this okay? Rivets sit flush in all the dimples (both skin and spar) but I am concerned that I have not dimpled correctly.

Thanks in advance.
__________________
Jim Smith, RV-8 Empenage, Las Vegas
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-13-2012, 05:19 PM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is offline
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,408
Default Welcome to VAF!!!!

Jim, welcome to VAF

Good to have you aboard.
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909

Rv-10, N210LM.

Flying as of 12/4/2010

Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011

Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.

"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-13-2012, 05:51 PM
rockwoodrv9 rockwoodrv9 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Meridian ID, Aspen CO, Okemos MI
Posts: 2,641
Default NOT AN EXPERT

JBS,
I am in no way an expert and not completely sure I am understanding your question, but if you are saying the rivet would be lose if you pressed down on the skin so the skin was tight to the rib, that doesn't sound right. I believe the last thing you want is the rivet to be able to move around. I think they call that a "smoking" rivet because it rubs on the skin and makes a black mark around the rivet.

I found that when I was bucking the rivets, if I wasn't careful and put the pressure on the rivet guu, pressing the rivet to skin or rib, and just let the bucking bar use its own weight to smash the back side of the rivet, I got the rivets tight.

Maybe a picture - if you can figure out how to post one! would help. Good luck. Im sure others here will help get you on track. Good luck with your build.
__________________
rockwoodrv9a
Williamston MI
O-320 D2A
Awaiting DAR Inspection

Last edited by rockwoodrv9 : 05-13-2012 at 05:53 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-13-2012, 06:04 PM
vlittle's Avatar
vlittle vlittle is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Victoria, Canada
Posts: 2,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBSmitty View Post
Hello all,

I am working on the Horizontal Stabilizer on a RV-8, and have a very basic question.

The instructions say to dimple the spars using a pneumatic or hand squeezer and the skins with a C-Frame, which I have done. (My micrometer tells me that they are both .0325")

Prior to riveting, I thought I would double check my work and cleco a spar to the skin, and what I see is that the dimples seem to sit flush in each other, but now I can see in certain locations where the skin does not sit perfectly flat on the spar in between the dimpled holes. Is this okay? Rivets sit flush in all the dimples (both skin and spar) but I am concerned that I have not dimpled correctly.

Thanks in advance.
Here is a common problem that I've seen with new builders. Often, when squeezing dimples with a pneumatic or hand squeezer, the dimple is not properly formed. This can also be a problem with a c-frame, but is less likely.

The root cause of this with a pneumatic squeezer is twofold. Firstly, the squeezer dies must be adjusted just right. The two should be in contact with the squeezer actuated, and you should just be able to rotate one of the dies with your fingers.

The second problem is that the squeezer yoke may be bending. This is more of a problem with a longeron yoke than the other yokes, or with cheap yokes. A bending yoke means that the dimple will not be properly formed. Adjusting the dies so they are more together helps this.

Ultimately, after you squeeze a dimple, it must be perfectly formed with no deforming of the skin around the dimple (waviness when held to the light) If you have any deformation of the skin, then dimples will not nest together very well.

If the dimples in the two parts are well formed, then you have nothing to worry about.

The C-frame produces better dimples, but only if you hit them with the right force. Again, check to make sure that the dimples are well formed and the skin around them has no waviness.

In conclusion, when I've had problems with a squeezer forming a good dimple, I use the C-frame. Give it a try.
__________________
===========
V e r n. ====
=======
RV-9A complete
Harmon Rocket complete
S-21 wings complete
Victoria, BC (Summer)
Chandler, Az (Winter)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-13-2012, 08:23 PM
JBSmitty JBSmitty is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2
Default

Thanks for all the replies and the welcome to VAF.

I do have a DRDT-2 which I used for the skins, and the spars where it would fit. Looking closer, this is only really occuring where I could not get the DRDT-2 to work on the spars. I used a pneumatic squeezer here, followed up by a hand squeezer. Dies were set as described above.

Everything fits pretty well, but where I did not use the DRDT-2 on the spars I can see where the dimples do not fit as nicely. Maybe time to go to the gym and strengthen my hands! I'll take another go at the hand squeezer on these, as my pneumatic doesn't have the juice to do more.

As a separate issue, the nose ribs on the horizontal stab are a real pain to dimple. I used pop rivet dimple dies, but these dimples are no where near as nice as with the DRDT-2. I discovered if I put a bend into the horizontal stab skin similiar to what it will be assembled, I got a much better dimple, but they are still inferior to the other dimples. Is there a better solution?

Thanks again for the replies.
__________________
Jim Smith, RV-8 Empenage, Las Vegas
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-13-2012, 09:43 PM
RV7AJeremy's Avatar
RV7AJeremy RV7AJeremy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gilbert AZ
Posts: 414
Default Common question

I use this guy, works great!
http://www.cleavelandtoolstore.com/p...mber=DIE4263DF
__________________
Jeremy
ATP, CFI, CFII
RV-7 N424JD KCHD
EAA Tech Counselor
2017 Bronze Lindy
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-13-2012, 09:56 PM
Andrew M's Avatar
Andrew M Andrew M is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Secluded Lake,Alaska (AK49)
Posts: 359
Default Dimpling

For hard to reach spots I use a countersunk monel rivet, hammer, punch into a countersink cut into a piece of steel. I'll toss the rivet after two or three holes. As for the original question, I think you are asking if its O.K. that the skin doesn't sit flat when the dimples are completely nested together.I recall a reference from a Convair 580 SRM that listed acceptable gaps between skins and or structure after riveting, .008" or something. They also had a chart showing strength of various fastener types, and nested dimpled joint were by far the strongest. Usually what happens is the last bit of forming takes place when the rivet is set, eliminating small mismatches and making everything sit alot tighter. Try it out on some scrap.
__________________
Andrew Miller
A&P, IA
-9 empennage
Wings arrived 12 JAN 13
https://plus.google.com/photos/11360...J-TuJPsmOONzQE
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-13-2012, 10:05 PM
RV7AJeremy's Avatar
RV7AJeremy RV7AJeremy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gilbert AZ
Posts: 414
Default Tip

Another trick I learned is to use a little rubber grommet when squeezing rivets. (Harbor freight sells a bunch for cheap) I put it over the shop head side of the rivet before I squeeze it, as the squeezing begins, the rubber squeezes the two metal pieces together just before the shop heads begin to form. It works great and I wish I would have learned this trick earlier in the build. I have also noticed that the shop heads are a little under driven so I go back and squeeze again without the grommet.

Hope this help out.
__________________
Jeremy
ATP, CFI, CFII
RV-7 N424JD KCHD
EAA Tech Counselor
2017 Bronze Lindy
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-13-2012, 11:10 PM
longranger's Avatar
longranger longranger is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 45G, Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,867
Default

I've found that using tank dies on the structure and standard dies on the skin gives me more consistent dimple nesting.
__________________
Miles (VAF# 1238, Paid up as of 2018)
RV-7 TU 904KM (reserved)
Wings Fitted and Finish Kit on site

Construction Log
Picasa: Empennage Album, Wings Album, Fuselage Album

1955 Cessna 170B flying since 1982

'To get something you never had, you have to do something you never did.' -Unk.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-14-2012, 09:46 AM
N355DW's Avatar
N355DW N355DW is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by longranger View Post
I've found that using tank dies on the structure and standard dies on the skin gives me more consistent dimple nesting.
+1 on the tank dimple die.

I'm also going to add a little bit of wisdom I learned from Van's tech support about nesting your dimples and countersinks.

You can't judge how well your parts will fit together by how they look when they are clecoed. The rivet exerts far more pressure and will pull the parts together very well even if there were gaps when you clecoed them together.

I learned this when I countersunk some holes in thinner stock. I thought I had to countersink the part enough so that a dimpled part would set into it perfectly.

The only problem with that is - if you do that in thin stock the hole becomes too large for a 1/8" rivet. When I called to ask if I should use the "oops" rivets in these parts, first they said yes I could, but then the nice fellow at Van's added not to countersink the parts so much, just do it to the point you start to enlarge the hole (or right before if you can judge that well) and the rivet will pull the pieces together nicely. The dimple will actually flatten into the countersink under pressure from the rivet.

I now put a few rivets in, then check for gaps before continuing. If there are none I know I am good.
__________________
Damon Wack
RV-7 in progress
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.