VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV Ongoing Maintenance Issues
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-20-2006, 04:19 PM
gmcjetpilot's Avatar
gmcjetpilot gmcjetpilot is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,283
Default Flying golf balls

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigH@KRPH
I took a mini tour of the Shepard AFB flightline a few years back. It was the height of the hail season in North Texas, and all of the T-37s / T-38s had thick padded blanket wing envelopes to protect against hail. They must work, because we sure get some nasty stuff up this way on occasion.
Interesting, that was what I was thinking but did not know if it was practical. For home base sure but cross country the pads would be too much to carry around.

Hummmm faster with the dents, I have the ball peen in hand now. Any volunteers?
__________________
George
Raleigh, NC Area
RV-4, RV-7, ATP, CFII, MEI, 737/757/767

2020 Dues Paid
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-20-2006, 05:05 PM
mdredmond mdredmond is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 416
Default

Hmmm. I thought these planes derived a lot of their strength from the stressed-skin construction? Seems like dents everywhere would be begging something to fold or collapse. I'm not sure I'd want to fly around in a plane that was so banged up.
__________________
Matt Redmond
Denton, TX (KDTO) - VAF #510
Got the Bug & Wife's Signoff
RV-9 Tip-Up, Empennage & Wing
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-21-2006, 03:05 PM
gmcjetpilot's Avatar
gmcjetpilot gmcjetpilot is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,283
Default structural but not in that way

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdredmond
Hmmm. I thought these planes derived a lot of their strength from the stressed-skin construction? Seems like dents everywhere would be begging something to fold or collapse. I'm not sure I'd want to fly around in a plane that was so banged up.
NOT A BAD QUESTION. Some aircraft use the skin to take compression and tension but not in our case.

Flat sheet metal does not take any compression, at least the allowable is very very low. Some manufactures add stringers and tie that to the side of the body. In our case all the shear, bending comes out in the front and rear spar. The torsion is taken as a "couple" between the front and rear spar. Basically the same with the Horz stab.

The design assumes all the bending loads are in the spars (wing horz-stab).

The torsion is in the skin, but the dents don't really affect this. It ain't goodness either.

The fuselage top is almost a faring in that we use the heavy stringer or angle along the "gunnel" (boat term). This angle is called a longeron on aircraft (major structure running from front to rear). The skin on the top of the fuelage is important but not critical.

As long as it is not sharp edge creases or a sharp stress concentration or stress riser where a crack can start, it is not bad.

Disclaimer - It could cause problems? A structural aerospace engineer would need to evaluate by close inspection. I get $150.00 and hour.
__________________
George
Raleigh, NC Area
RV-4, RV-7, ATP, CFII, MEI, 737/757/767

2020 Dues Paid

Last edited by gmcjetpilot : 06-21-2006 at 04:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-21-2006, 03:16 PM
Alex Alex is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: northern Virginia (DC area)
Posts: 198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmcjetpilot
The torsion is in the skin, but the dents don't really affect this. It ain't goodness either.

As long as it is not sharp edge creases or a sharp stress concentration or stress riser where a crack can start, it is not bad.
Why do you think the dents wouldn't affect the torsion buckle limit of the skin? I would expect them to, and the only way to test is with destructive testing.
__________________


Alex Roup
RV-12 (empennage) #120407
Northern VA
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-21-2006, 03:21 PM
jcoloccia jcoloccia is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,110
Default

There are 2 RV's up here at Fox in Lancaster that are pretty beat up from hail and apparently they are just fine. Take it for what it is...anecdotal data
__________________
John Coloccia
www.ballofshame.com
Former builder, but still lurking 'cause you're a pretty cool bunch...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-21-2006, 06:19 PM
photoadjuster photoadjuster is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 37
Default Buy it

The hail damage does not look any worst than my Skylane. Flown 1,000 since the damage.

You are exactly right, it is 5 knots faster than it should be.

Mike Stephenson
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-21-2006, 11:50 PM
txaviator's Avatar
txaviator txaviator is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, TX (DFW)
Posts: 1,164
Default Mike...

Your post reinforces the 'hammered' 172's (and a Tomahawk mixed in) at my original flight school. I remember preflighting and thinking "what the **** am I about to fly?" In the end, they all still flew just fine....but what did I know back then?
__________________
Gary Robertson
Arlington, TX

RV-12 Built / Sold / Flying
Currently Flying: Cessna Skyhawk 172
Rebuilding a true barn find J-3 Cub
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:01 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.