Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mdredmond
Hmmm. I thought these planes derived a lot of their strength from the stressed-skin construction? Seems like dents everywhere would be begging something to fold or collapse. I'm not sure I'd want to fly around in a plane that was so banged up.
|
NOT A BAD QUESTION. Some aircraft use the skin to take compression and tension but not in our case.
Flat sheet metal does not take any compression, at least the allowable is very very low. Some manufactures add stringers and tie that to the side of the body. In our case all the shear, bending comes out in the front and rear spar. The torsion is taken as a "couple" between the front and rear spar. Basically the same with the Horz stab.
The design assumes all the bending loads are in the spars (wing horz-stab).
The torsion is in the skin, but the dents don't really affect this. It ain't goodness either.
The fuselage top is almost a faring in that we use the heavy stringer or angle along the "gunnel" (boat term). This angle is called a longeron on aircraft (major structure running from front to rear). The skin on the top of the fuelage is important but not critical.
As long as it is not sharp edge creases or a sharp stress concentration or stress riser where a crack can start, it is not bad.
Disclaimer - It could cause problems? A structural aerospace engineer would need to evaluate by close inspection. I get $150.00 and hour.
