VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-18-2012, 10:04 AM
Jackm Jackm is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Prosser,WA
Posts: 272
Default IO-540

I am in search of IO-540 C4B5 and found a few that are narrow deck and one that is wide deck. In your opinion, what is narrow deck serviceablity and durability compared to wide deck? Any other advise regarding IO-540 search to fit the RV10?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-18-2012, 10:25 AM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is offline
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,408
Default Welcome to VAF!!!!

Jack, welcome to the good ship VAF.

Good to have you aboard.

Sorry, cant help you with the engine, mine is already in use on my 10.
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909

Rv-10, N210LM.

Flying as of 12/4/2010

Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011

Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.

"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-18-2012, 10:50 AM
Auburntsts's Avatar
Auburntsts Auburntsts is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackm View Post
I am in search of IO-540 C4B5 and found a few that are narrow deck and one that is wide deck. In your opinion, what is narrow deck serviceablity and durability compared to wide deck? Any other advise regarding IO-540 search to fit the RV10?
Can't really speak to the narrow-deck vs wide-deck question, other than to say the WD is a "newer" design, but I don't think it really matters much one way or the other.

Just make sure you're looking at parallel valve engines as IIRC the angle valve motors don't physically fit without major mods to the cowl. I think they weigh more too which could cause W&B issues.
__________________
Todd "I drink and know things" Stovall
PP ASEL-IA
RV-10 N728TT - Flying!
WAR EAGLE!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-18-2012, 10:56 AM
aerhed aerhed is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Big Sandy, WY
Posts: 2,567
Default

I just finished putting together the lower end of a 540-E4B5 ND for my next 10. I haven't done cylinders yet, so options are open. If you're interested I might part with it and finish it however you like.
__________________
Actual repeat offender.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-18-2012, 11:04 AM
mahlon_r mahlon_r is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,024
Default

In my opinion durability and serviceability are equal. Although Lycoming no longer produces N/D engines, they are fully supported from a parts perspective. So to me, there isn't a real reason not to go either way. The N/D engine weighs about 1 pound more then the W/D like accessories and configuration, so weight shouldn't be an issues either.
Of course N/D engines have been around for longer calendar time then W/D, so as with any engine purchase, a good review of the engine's history is necessary to ensure that you know what you are getting as far as an engine core is concerned.
Good Luck,
Mahlon
"The opinions and information provided in this and all of my posts are hopefully helpful to you. Please use the information provided responsibly and at your own risk."
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:53 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.