VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-29-2012, 09:59 PM
ao.frog ao.frog is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Manstad, Norway
Posts: 866
Default Pros and cons with teflon fuel-lines?

Hi you engine guru's out there.

I bought the IO-360 Lyc from Vans about two years ago and a couple of days ago, it was time to install the FT-60 FF sensor (the"red cube").
As on my other -7, the plan was to install the sensor on the fuel-line beetween the engine driven fuelpump and the fuel injection servo.

However, the airplane-shop who installed the same type of sensor on my first -7 couldn't do it this time since the fuel-line Vans provided in their FF-kit now is made of teflon.
The fuel-lines on my first -7 where made of the usual rubber-type and they had no problem working with them back in 2007.

I now have a couple of options.

1) Send the fuel-line and the sensor to someone in the US who can work with teflon fuel-hoses.

2) Have the airplane-shop make new fuel-hoses made of rubber and have them install the FF-sensor on that one.

Since option 1 is both time-consuming and expensive, I would rather go for option 2, but then I'd have rubber fuel-lines.

I don't mind having rubber fuel-lines at all, but is the any good reason I should keep the teflon-lines?
Any advantages beside that those will live "forever"?
I don't mind changing the rubber-fuel lines every 10 years...
(I have read somewhere that rubber-lines schould be replaced at that interval)

So: before making any decitions, it'd be interesting to hear what you engine-guru's are saying about teflon vs rubber?
(Mel; are you there?? )
__________________
Regards Alf Olav Frog / Norway
First RV-7 completed, (bought partly finished from a US-builder) 305 hrs per July 2014, SOLD
Second -7 had first flight Feb 25th 2014. 220 hrs pr July 2019. Life is good!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-30-2012, 06:55 AM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ao.frog View Post
I don't mind having rubber fuel-lines at all, but is the any good reason I should keep the Teflon-lines?
Any advantages beside that those will live "forever"?
I don't mind changing the rubber-fuel lines every 10 years...
(I have read somewhere that rubber-lines should be replaced at that interval)

So: before making any decisions, it'd be interesting to hear what you engine-guru's are saying about Teflon vs rubber?
(Mel; are you there?? )
Standard fluid lines do typically last for 10 years or more if not disturbed. However, I believe the recommend replacement period is 5 years. And that includes shelf life.
I ran my first standard lines over 10 years, but I don't recommend that. When I removed them they were very stiff. Once they get stiff, they begin to deteriorate.
Personally, I recommend the Teflon lines.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-30-2012, 11:39 AM
ao.frog ao.frog is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Manstad, Norway
Posts: 866
Default

Thanks alot for chiming in Mel!

Ok, I'll keep the teflon-lines on my 2nd -7 and on my 2st -7, I'll plan to replace my rubber-lines with teflon as well when they are due for replacement.

I'll also update my maintenace-log to say 5 instead of 10 years for rubber fuel-line replacement.
I didn't think of including shelf-life to those 5 years, so I guess I've some fuel-lines to replace this summer...
__________________
Regards Alf Olav Frog / Norway
First RV-7 completed, (bought partly finished from a US-builder) 305 hrs per July 2014, SOLD
Second -7 had first flight Feb 25th 2014. 220 hrs pr July 2019. Life is good!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-30-2012, 12:08 PM
frankh's Avatar
frankh frankh is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 3,547
Default

Teflon is virtually bulletproof chemically speaking. I have used it almost universally from agressive industrial solvets to 50% hydrochloric acid and everything in between.

I would have no hesitation in using teflon hoses (for 100LL and mogas with or without ethanol) and I bet they have a very long service life (although I don't KNOW what it would be).

Seeing as I have the local hydraulics shop make mine up for next to nothing I could replace them evry year if I wanted to..No point though.

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-30-2012, 12:17 PM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
Default

At Oshkosh last year, I asked the two major suppliers of aviation grade Teflon-hose what the lifetime should be (when they would recommend replacement). Both of them said the exact same thing - "That will be determined by the aircraft manufacturer". (Kind of a funny way to respond at an "Experimental" aircraft show, but let's not start that argument...)

The bottom line was that neither would give me any number at all regarding service life, and both suggested that it was not infinite. I'm sure their response was (at least partially) lawyer-driven.

Paul
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-30-2012, 02:40 PM
RV8RIVETER's Avatar
RV8RIVETER RV8RIVETER is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 1T7, Kestrel Airpark , Texas
Posts: 773
Default

We use either Teflon or stainless lines exclusively at my work. Teflon is used without service life restriction to carry 100% IPA, Acetone, 40% HF acid, 40% hydrogen peroxide, and HCl gas just to name a few. The only degradation I have ever seen is on the furnace gas exhaust lines which carry away process tube acid exhaust from a 1000 deg C furnace. After 5 or more years of that kind of heat they tend to loose flexibility and can crack when moved.

I don't think there is anything to worry about for our applications.
__________________
Wade Lively
-8, Flying!
N100WL
IO-360A3B6D, WW 200RV
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-30-2012, 04:13 PM
Kyle Boatright Kyle Boatright is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,208
Default

I can't think of a single downside to teflon lines.

What have I missed?
__________________
Kyle Boatright
Marietta, GA
2001 RV-6 N46KB
2019(?) RV-10
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-30-2012, 04:18 PM
Bavafa Bavafa is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,344
Default

Is there an easy way to determine which one is Teflon and which is rubber hose? I have used what VANs supplied (less than four years ago). How do I know if it is Teflon vs. rubber since it is covered.
__________________
Mehrdad
N825SM RV7A - IO360M1B - SOLD
N825MS RV14A - IO390 - Flying
Dues paid
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-30-2012, 05:25 PM
rocketbob's Avatar
rocketbob rocketbob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 8I3
Posts: 3,562
Default

Recently I was at the International Motorsports Industry Show here in Indy and I had a look at some of the latest racing hoses and fittings. Goodridge makes a new convoluted teflon hose with black Kevlar jacket that in -6 size it is pressure rated at over 1000psi and has a burst rating of 3900psi. Incredibly light. Google "Goodridge 710".
__________________

Please don't PM me! Email only!

Bob Japundza CFI A&PIA
N9187P PA-24-260B Comanche, flying
N678X F1 Rocket, under const.
N244BJ RV-6 "victim of SNF tornado" 1200+ hrs, rebuilding
N8155F C150 flying
N7925P PA-24-250 Comanche, restoring
Not a thing I own is stock.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-30-2012, 05:27 PM
TS Flightlines TS Flightlines is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ridgeland, SC
Posts: 2,584
Default Alf-

sent you a PM.
Tom
__________________
Tom Swearengen, TS Flightlines LLC, AS Flightlines
Joint Venture with Aircraft Specialty
Teflon Hose Assemblies for Experimentals
Proud Vendor for RV1, Donator to VAF
RV7 Tail Kit Completed, Fuse started-Pay as I go Plan
Ridgeland, SC
www.tsflightlines.com, www.asflightlines.com
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:04 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.