Why can't I decide!!!

[gbrasch]

I went thru the same thing when I started. One thing stuck out for me, when someone at Vans asked what my experience was in. Besides a few thousand hours of helicopter time, all my F/W time was in tri gear aircraft, including several hours instructing in them. I was asked why I would want to build something that I didn't have experience in. That made sense to me and I went with an A model. Insurance might be another consideration. Just my two cents to further confuse you......

[bullojm1]

Chad,
I too am in the same boat as you are. I didn't have any tailwheel time when I started my -7A and didn't even consider the -7. While waiting for my wings to arrive, I had some time to kill and took a lesson in a citabria. The first lesson was difficult for me. It took a lot more skill to fly it then a 172 - but I liked it. So far I have 4.4 hours of tw and really enjoy it a lot. It made flying more fun for me. I think my arm is twisted now to go with the -7!

[donahuedc]

I have to agree with Glen. If you're giving the taildragger serious consideration, you should get lots more time in one. Not that it is a bad choice, it's just that you need to make an informed decision after the excitement of the new challenge has worn off.

[cjensen]

Thanks for all the GREAT replies everyone! I've said it before, I'll say it again, and you all will agree with me that THIS IS A GREAT PLACE TO HANG OUT!

Thanks friends.

I have to say that my HEART is telling me TW ALL THE WAY. I asked Brittne about it tonight, and SHE wants the TW (she thinks it looks better-can't argue that!). I'll get some more time in Jack's -7, and each time will convince me further that I should build the TW (as will Jack! ). Is it necessarily the most practical thing to do? Nope, but who ever said flying anything for fun was practical?

[Lorin Dueck]

Chad -

Glad you & the misses are in sync!

For my 9 / 9A - I had to make the decision early since the empennage kit assembly is slightly different between the two.

I have my tailwheel endorsement but eventually chose the 9A.
Why??? -

- Well... I'm short (5 - 6 1/2") - and had a heck of a time looking over the cowl (yeah I know about S turns.. but still).
- I will be operating almost entirely out of paved runways.
- There is negligible difference in performance.
- No matter what anybody thinks - It is more forgiving to land
- (...and I hate to bring it up for fear of the possible replies) but If I ever decide to sell - there are a lot more prospective buyers).

Did I make the right decison? Yes - I'm building a Van's!!

Lorin D
9A Wings
N194LD

[rv8guy]

I love my tail dragger, but geez, you will like whatever you decide. No bad choices, just two good ones to pick between

Follow your heart

[N713R]

Chad,

I don't think I even need to tell you what I think. But just in case, Jack and I will TRY to go easy on you if you decide the other way.

[Mel]

LORIN, 5' 6 1/2" IS NOT SHORT!!!!!

I'm 5' 4" and in my RV, I'm as tall as anybody! Seriously, height makes no difference in an RV. You simply adjust the cushions to where your eyeballs are at the same level as everyone else. As a matter of fact, many of the regional jets have a referance plate at the windshield so you can adjust the seat. Then anyone flying the airplane has the exact same view.

[Lorin Dueck]

Mel
I can see it now....
- me strapped down on top of 3 pillows
- and a couple of 4x4's duct taped to the rudder pedals.....
Nice visual.... LOL
Lorin D

[cjensen]

Originally Posted by N713R

Chad,

I don't think I even need to tell you what I think. But just in case, Jack and I will TRY to go easy on you if you decide the other way.

Nope, you don't. No worries, I'll put it on the right end...I don't want to hear it from you guys.