VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV Ongoing Maintenance Issues
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-21-2011, 08:34 AM
Cadstat's Avatar
Cadstat Cadstat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 199
Default Boy is my face red

I installed my fuel gauge sending units with a stock rubber gasket coated with Fuel Lube because I thought I read that's a good way to do it. BIG MISTAKE. Both failed and started leaking 6 months later. The gaskets squeezed out just enough to leak. It may work if you don't tighten the screws too much or maybe skip the Fuel Lube. I pulled the tanks again and I'm prosealing them now. I also read that's a good way to install them but a bugger to remove later. Well, pulling the tanks again is a bummer too. Just an FYI.
__________________
John D. Artz, EAA 71811, 100+ Young Eagle flts
Adopted Dave's 6A
MXL Ultralight, only bleeding after 3 landings
Scorpion Two Helicopter, big mistake
PA-28 and 210E Centurion
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-21-2011, 08:39 AM
Sam Buchanan's Avatar
Sam Buchanan Sam Buchanan is offline
been here awhile
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 4,300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadstat View Post
I installed my fuel gauge sending units with a stock rubber gasket coated with Fuel Lube because I thought I read that's a good way to do it. BIG MISTAKE. Both failed and started leaking 6 months later. The gaskets squeezed out just enough to leak. It may work if you don't tighten the screws too much or maybe skip the Fuel Lube. I pulled the tanks again and I'm prosealing them now. I also read that's a good way to install them but a bugger to remove later. Well, pulling the tanks again is a bummer too. Just an FYI.
The sending units can usually be serviced without pulling tanks. I resealed a sender (RV-6) by carefully working it out through the gap between tank and fuse.
__________________
Sam Buchanan
RV-6
Fokker D.VII replica
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-21-2011, 08:42 AM
n5lp's Avatar
n5lp n5lp is offline
fugio ergo sum
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Carlsbad, NM
Posts: 1,912
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadstat View Post
...I also read that's a good way to install them but a bugger to remove later. Well, pulling the tanks again is a bummer too. Just an FYI.
I agree that just proseal is the way to go. I have had to remove the prosealed plates and found that it wasn't difficult at all.
__________________
Larry Pardue
Carlsbad, NM

RV-6 N441LP Flying
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-21-2011, 09:07 AM
Cadstat's Avatar
Cadstat Cadstat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 199
Default Flop tube option

You can service one sender from the outside but the other is on the back side of the tank if the tank was built with a flop tube.
__________________
John D. Artz, EAA 71811, 100+ Young Eagle flts
Adopted Dave's 6A
MXL Ultralight, only bleeding after 3 landings
Scorpion Two Helicopter, big mistake
PA-28 and 210E Centurion
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-21-2011, 09:17 AM
Neal@F14's Avatar
Neal@F14 Neal@F14 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 2,182
Default

The gooey brown Permatex "Aviation" Form-a-Gasket #3 sealant works perfectly well on cork fuel sender gaskets, no leaks after years and years (10 yrs on my old Cherokee, 7 yrs on a buddy's RV-4), and can still be disassembled much more easily than gluing everything together with proseal.
__________________
Neal Howard
Airplaneless once again...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-21-2011, 12:10 PM
Omega232Devils's Avatar
Omega232Devils Omega232Devils is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Catawba, NC
Posts: 318
Default Heavy on the Proseal

I recommend if you are going to go with only the proseal, to put a nice thick layer, on the tank and the back of the sending unit. The proseal will seal up nicely and it will give you just enough clearance to get a box cutter blade behind the sender front plate and the tank wall to cut the proseal should you ever have to remove it agian.

I just had to cut out the access plate with a dremel, then use the box cutter from inside, the smaller hole, to remove the remaining portion of the access panel. There was no removing the sending unit though. The proseal was sealed good, but so little was used it was impossible to get a blade under it. For $27 I put in a new fuel sender with the new access panel and my fuel gauge works again. (So it is not all bad!)

IMHO,

Dan
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------

Dan Thompson
RV-6A - N426JM - 180hp / C.S. / dual PMags
NC26 - Long Island Airpark, NC
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-21-2011, 02:35 PM
flion's Avatar
flion flion is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 2,647
Default

Waitaminnit, guys, he didn't say the cork gasket failed. He said it was the rubber one. Now, I'm indifferent to which gasket you use on the big plate, though I have personally been happy with my cork gaskets, especially when I had to pull a tank open to install a fuel return for the AFP injection. I know another builder who had to do the same after using ProSeal and I can only say that I know a few words I didn't before... . But I'm having a hard time picturing how the smaller gaskets will be improved with ProSeal. To respond to the OP, I doubt the Fuel Lube was a factor; I'm betting you over-torqued the plate, crushing the gasket. And, yes, pulling the senders later, if you ever need to, will be a bugger.
__________________
Patrick Kelley - Flagstaff, AZ
RV-6A N156PK - Flying too much to paint
RV-10 14MX(reserved) - Fuselage on gear
http://www.mykitlog.com/flion/
EAA Technical Counselor #5357
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-23-2011, 08:00 AM
Cadstat's Avatar
Cadstat Cadstat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 199
Default Update

The fuel lube (E-Z- turn) is a synthetic grease. I essentially took a rubber gasket and greased it. I may have over torqued it but they were fine for 20 hours flight time and 6 months before the leak began but after removing them they look puffy like the grease degraded the rubber. The gaskets had migrated to one side on both tanks. The rubber gasket alone would probably be fine. I left out the gaskets this time and prosealed the senders to the tank.
__________________
John D. Artz, EAA 71811, 100+ Young Eagle flts
Adopted Dave's 6A
MXL Ultralight, only bleeding after 3 landings
Scorpion Two Helicopter, big mistake
PA-28 and 210E Centurion
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-23-2011, 12:12 PM
dmaib's Avatar
dmaib dmaib is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Smyrna Beach, FL
Posts: 1,339
Default

425 hours on rubber gaskets with fuel lube. No leaks at all. I was cautioned about over-torquing the screws, so was very careful. I had to replace the RH sender about a year ago. Very easy job using this method.

Just another data point.
__________________
David Maib
RV-10 N380DM
New Smyrna Beach, FL
VAF Paid 1/21/2020

"In '69 I was 21, and I called the road my own"
Jackson Browne





Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:16 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.