VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-21-2006, 04:30 PM
william weesner
 
Posts: n/a
Default the best lyclone ?

which lyclone engine is the best it?

Last edited by william weesner : 07-17-2006 at 02:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-21-2006, 05:22 PM
gbrasch gbrasch is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 613
Default Eci

Don't rule out ECI......

http://www.eci2fly.com/exp/index_exp.html
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-21-2006, 05:27 PM
sprucemoose's Avatar
sprucemoose sprucemoose is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MKE
Posts: 1,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gbrasch
Don't rule out ECI......
Especially if you like to replace cylinders, connecting rods, etc. Go Superior, a few more $ but worth it.
__________________
Jeff Point
RV-6, RLU-1 built & flying
Tech Counselor, Flight Advisor & President, EAA Chapter 18
Milwaukee
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-21-2006, 05:36 PM
NYTOM NYTOM is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 1,128
Wink Best lyclone

Check out the TMX-360. Has what I think is a "Superior" (pun intended) case construction and a well designed pressure lubrication system. Check it out on Mattituck's web site. Their site isn't as flashy as the Superior's site but if you compare part for part, you may (or not) come to the same conclusion. Either way you go its probable still better than a real Lyc. You asked.
NYTOM
6A N822PM (res)
TMX-360 carb,FP
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-21-2006, 07:58 PM
Captain Avgas Captain Avgas is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sprucemoose
Especially if you like to replace cylinders, connecting rods, etc. Go Superior, a few more $ but worth it.
I doubt that's there's much difference between the (I)O360 components supplied by ECI, Superior, or Lycoming....they're all producing parts for the certified market that are basically interchangeable.

Rather, the point of real difference may well lie in the quality of the assembly and balancing, the warranty, and the back-up one might receive in the event of problems. The Superior warranty seems a little limited to me unless you want to pay extra bucks for an extension. Also I'm not sure that all the guys who bought the disasterous Superior Ryton sump are happy at the moment with the type of responses they're getting from Superior.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-21-2006, 08:11 PM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
Default All quick-witted responses aside...

William,

What I found worked well for me was to first pick an engine assembler (Aerosport, Superior, Mattituck, etc), and then talk to their engineers to find out what components they recommended - and most importantly, why. As an engineer, I like to rely on data and facts - tell me why something works, or why something else doesn't. Find out about their overall reliability from others. Find out how long they have been building engines (this is important in gauging how much to trust their level of experience).

Lots of folks have lots of second and third-hand stories about engine and component failures, but I found that if you really try and track them down, many of the problems occur with inexpensive overhauls or inexperienced overhaualers (hey, everyone has to start somewhere!), or with improper initial run-in. It's hard to pin those on the big-time engine builders!

I originally picked who I thought was going to build my engine from advertisements and seminars at shows. When it came time to spend $20,000 of my own money, I realized that I needed to do the research and get down to the details. I ended up going with a different builder, and different components when all was said and down - and I am very, very happy with my choices.

I'm not going to tell you what to choose, or what not to choose - you will be much more comfortable once you make your own decisions basd on your own research - and it's a lot of fun!

Paul
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-22-2006, 03:23 AM
sprucemoose's Avatar
sprucemoose sprucemoose is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MKE
Posts: 1,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Barrow
I doubt that's there's much difference between the (I)O360 components supplied by ECI, Superior, or Lycoming....
Tell that to all the people who had to pull their engines in the last few months to replace their ECI cylinders. Or those who are about to pull their engines and split the cases to replace their ECI connecting rods. Anyone remember cermichrome cylinders?
__________________
Jeff Point
RV-6, RLU-1 built & flying
Tech Counselor, Flight Advisor & President, EAA Chapter 18
Milwaukee
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-22-2006, 04:48 AM
William Slaughter's Avatar
William Slaughter William Slaughter is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 469
Default

Aerosport Power. They can assemble your engine with virtually any of the components currently available, and are astonishingly nice people to deal with. Last time I checked, they also had the longest warranty by far.
__________________
William Slaughter
Houston, TX
RV-8QB
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-22-2006, 09:38 AM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by william weesner
thanks for all the info. i think i have what i need now..i was concerned about the recall and such as i really dont want to take it apart before i even run it.
as for bart and those do they give you a build sheet of the specific part # s so you can keep track of the recalls if applicable

When Mattituck built my engine, they kept track of all the serialized parts. When I saw the ECI Rod AD, (which really only affects a very limited number of engines, and even that, only at 2000 hours...), I sent a note to Mahlon, asking if mine were affected, and got an answer back in 30 minutes (Nope!). I have such a huge stack of paperwork from building my airplane that while I know the engine build sheet is in there somewhere, it was easier to ask...

Paul
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-22-2006, 01:10 PM
7pilot's Avatar
7pilot 7pilot is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Midlothian, TX
Posts: 169
Wink Chevy or a Chrysler?

This is an emotional topic, talk to a few people about what kind of car they prefer, there are pros and cons to any of them... I have a problem with superior and their warranty - I can go to ECI or Aero Sport and get a 3 year warranty - so how come Superior doesn't do that? I wouldn't condemn anyone for going with any type engine, including the subies, while I hope to be happy with my decision, I know there will always be someone out there telling me what a mistake it was and how their decision was right.

My advice - don't by a Chrysler product
__________________
Stewart Cole
N156DE RV-7A Tip-up, IO360 CS 3 blade MT Prop
http://www.7pilot.com
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:43 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.