|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

10-29-2011, 11:22 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,256
|
|
Dynon EGT & CHT probe wires waaaaaay long
Just a quick question...I'm ready to connect up the Dynon EMS harness to the EGT and CHT probe wires, but the set of probes/wires that came with the Skyview are uber-long. I mean like several feet long. They're beautifully made, and I hesitate to goober them up by trying to cut them and re-install/crimp on connecters (I'd rather use what's there already). Anybody have any experience/recommendations for dealing with these longish thingies?
Thanks much...
Steve
__________________
Steve "Flying Scotsman"
Santa Clarita, CA
PP-ASEL, ASES, Instrument Airplane
RV-7A N660WS flying!
#8,000
|

10-30-2011, 03:26 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sydney, Aust.
Posts: 820
|
|
Do not cut CHT/EGT probes...
I think it might be the Dynon manual that prohibits it, could be somewhere else though, that I read the thermocouple probes are calibrated for their wire length and any trimming thereof upsets the calibration.
__________________
Once you have tasted flight you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return - Leonardo DaVinci
My Flickr gallery: http://www.flickr.com/photos/35521362@N06/
RV-9A - Finished on 10th February 2016 after 4 years, 9 months and 19 days! The 1020th RV-9 flying.
First flight 26th March 2016. Essential specs 145KTAS @ 2400RPM, 8000', 24.2LPH, Initial RoC 1800FPM.
|

10-30-2011, 05:56 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Providence, SC
Posts: 47
|
|
Probes
DO NOT cut the actual probe wires. These already have connectors on them. The harness wires (covered in brown insulation) are meant to be cut as they have no connectors. In my installation I brought all the probe wires to a convenient location on the lower aft arm of the engine mount on each side. Gently bent the probe wires to make all the connectors arrive at roughly the same point, and tie wrapped them there. Then cut the harness wires to length and installed connectors. Coupled it all together and tie wrapped the harness to the engine mount as needed. Please remember to use the self sticking silicon tape under any tie wrap around the engine mount.
__________________
Mike Kullenberg
Dantzler Plantation
Providence, SC
RV-9A N409G
In paint at Glo-Custom new number is N573PM
ECI IO-360 CS
Dynon Skyview
|

03-14-2012, 07:04 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 11
|
|
I'm routing my CHT/EGT wires now... was thinking that two 8-position terminal strips (L&R sides of the firewall) would be a nice way to handle these connections. Any reason to avoid terminal strips for this? I'm building an experimental piper with a really short engine/firewall distance; probe wires reach the firewall no problem.
REALLY perfect would be a bulkead/pass-through type terminal strip, so the harness wires would connect on the cold side of the firewall. Anybody seen such a thing in 8-position with possibility for at least one side to be spade connectors? My sensors are pre-terminated with 1/4" female spades, harness is unterminated right now (dynon).
thanks everyone!
|

03-14-2012, 07:47 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,685
|
|
I'm with the guys that say don't mess with the thermal couple wires
I'm with the guys that say don't mess with the thermal couple wires. I just tied them into the wire bundle behind the instrument panel. They work fine.
Bob Axsom
|

03-14-2012, 07:50 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 164
|
|
You can shorten thermocouples with no problems (either the probe wires or the wires to the EMS). This is guidance straight from Dynon:
http://dynonavionics.com/cgi-bin/yab...1268674167/1#1
I have shortened mine on both sides of the connectors to make all of the joints line up and all read within a degree of each other.
|

03-15-2012, 12:19 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ashland, OR
Posts: 2,561
|
|
No Terminal Strips!!!
If you make a junction in thermocouple wire using terminal strips, unless you get magic terminal strips that are made of the correct thermocouple alloy, you will introduce an error. The error comes from the small difference in temperature at the two connections to the terminal strip.
Now, if the terminal strip is not covered by anything, chances are good that both terminal junctions for each wire will be at the same temperature, and you are probably OK. After all, we don't care about accuracy down to better than 5 degrees or something.
BUT....
If you were to make a firewall pass-through terminal strip, so that one junction of each thermocouple wire was forward of the firewall, and the other junction was aft of the firewall, then you will introduce HUGE errors.
Each place where the alloy changes forms a temperature-sensitive junction. So if you go from Chromel to copper then back to Chromel at a junction strip, then the temperature difference between the two connections will make a spurious voltage, an error. Thats why REAL thermocouple connectors have plugs and sockets that are made from the correct alloy and are specific to the type of thermocouple.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpinestar
I'm routing my CHT/EGT wires now... was thinking that two 8-position terminal strips (L&R sides of the firewall) would be a nice way to handle these connections. Any reason to avoid terminal strips for this? I'm building an experimental piper with a really short engine/firewall distance; probe wires reach the firewall no problem.
REALLY perfect would be a bulkead/pass-through type terminal strip, so the harness wires would connect on the cold side of the firewall. Anybody seen such a thing in 8-position with possibility for at least one side to be spade connectors? My sensors are pre-terminated with 1/4" female spades, harness is unterminated right now (dynon).
thanks everyone!
|
__________________
Steve Smith
Aeronautical Engineer
RV-8 N825RV
IO-360 A1A
WW 200RV
"The Magic Carpet"
Hobbs 625
LS6-15/18W sailplane SOLD
bought my old LS6-A back!! 
VAF donation Jan 2020
|

03-15-2012, 12:58 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 11
|
|
didn't realize the sensitivity of the connections... basically rules out the pass-through terminal strip idea. I still like the thought of a conventional terminal strip on the firewall from a neatness point of view... it would be uncovered and (hopefully) an even temperature. I think I'll go this route & leave enough slack to revert to a non-terminal strip approach if needed. Without the terminal strip, I have a lot of slack to coil up & secure somehow... just gets to be a rats nest & I'm picky about wiring neatness! any other ideas welcome.
thanks for the input.
|

03-15-2012, 03:41 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ehprata, WA
Posts: 318
|
|
__________________
Nate Benson
Ephrata, WA
RV9A/Slider N608MA
Flying
KitProject.com
"If you think you can do a thing, or think you can't do a thing, you're right." -- Henry Ford
Last edited by cln1owner : 03-15-2012 at 03:45 PM.
|

03-15-2012, 04:09 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Essex UK
Posts: 89
|
|
I would not cut them, and have the joints accessible as in 120 hours I have had to replace 3 of my Dynon EGT probs, just waiting for the forth to go! You can tell when there gone when one of your EGTs starts wandering a bit, then reads low. I thought I had an injector problem on the first one. Now it's just a regular thing!
Dave
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:17 AM.
|