VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 05-11-2006, 11:53 AM
william weesner
 
Posts: n/a
Default Crank Runout

i know this is vauge but what is typical (if such) of runout on a engine with a mangled fixed pitch prop., one blade bent back about a foot and the other fwd 6 or so inches...i guess my question really is when a prop strike occurs and runout is measured are all,some or a few cranks bent?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-11-2006, 01:26 PM
Vern's Avatar
Vern Vern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Peachtree City, Ga
Posts: 1,039
Default Crank-

Sorry, but this engine would need a tear-down to insure that it is airworthy.It may be, but you cannot tell until the basic components are checked. Therefore, it may not be a bargain by the time you disassemble,reassemble, do parts checks, buy gaskets,etc.
__________________
Vern Darley
Awarded FAA "The Wright Brothers 'Master Pilot' Award"- for 50 years safe flying

RV-6A N680V / RV-10QB N353RV
Luscombe 8E N2423K 50+years
Hatz Biplane N2423Z soon to be birthed
Falcon RV Squadron Founder
KFFC Hanger D-30
Peachtree City, Ga
770 310-7169
EAA Technical Counselor #5142
EAA Flight Advisor #486336
ATP/CFI/A&P/DAR
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-11-2006, 10:05 PM
tacchi88 tacchi88 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 194
Default Runout

Min. to max. run out allowed for Lycoming is .002. Maximum serviceable .005. If the engine had a prop strike, with Lycoming, in certified AC is a mandatory teardown. Rule may differ with a bit with Exp., but the wise will tear the engine and inspect for further damage, more often than not invisible to the naked eye. It's a **** shoot.
T88
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-2006, 10:32 PM
szicree szicree is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,061
Default

Can somebody please read the original poster's question again so that he can have it answered?
__________________
Steve Zicree
Fullerton, Ca. w/beautiful 2.5 year old son
RV-4 99% built and sold
Rag and tube project well under way

paid =VAF= dues through June 2013
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2006, 05:26 AM
mahlon_r mahlon_r is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,024
Default

Different OEM'S can use different manufacturing techniques, when making a crankshaft. Typical Lycoming crankshafts are not hardened right behind the crank flange and they tend to bend more easily, from a prop strike, then other crankshaft manufactures that have crankshafts that are hardened in that area. So the amount of bend form a given prop damage situation may vary by engine manufacturer due to differences in the way the shaft was manufactured.
The effect of a prop strike on the engine can be varied by the circumstances around that incident. One crankshaft might be bent significantly with less damage to a prop, then one that's prop was destroyed but the flange dialed within limits. So it is difficult to answer your question, as prop damage like you describe might have no flange run out under one set of circumstances and run out past limits in others. There is no rule of thumb.
Good Luck,
Mahlon
"The opinions and information provided in this and all of my posts are hopefully helpful to you. Please use the information provided responsibly and at you own risk."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:59 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.