VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-27-2006, 05:28 PM
RScott RScott is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Estacada, OR
Posts: 787
Default Dupont Tufcoat

Anyone have any experience with this paint? Hi gloss, non-isocyanate, spray with a respirator--sounds good to me.

http://www.performancecoatings.dupon...te3-5HG-NI.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-27-2006, 05:49 PM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Exclamation Cure time

2 hours to cure as a "Touch Time" at 70F sounds slow. You would need a really clean and dust free area to work in...

gil in Tucson
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2006, 04:58 AM
Highflight Highflight is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 472
Default

The large number and various types of new coatings coming out can be confusing so you really have to study the P-sheets to figure out what's really different about a product like this.
For this one, you learn all you need to know on the first page:

Tufcote? 3.5 HG-NI? is a high gloss, isocyanate-free, three component, VOC conforming (3.5 lbs./gal.) polyacryl
anhydride based on patented DuPont technology. The resulting highly durable finish delivers performance
comparable to DuPont Imron? 3.5 HG? and competitive polyurethane coatings.


What you're being told here are two simple things. First, that this paint is isocyanate-free and "VOC conforming", and second, that it is "comparable" to Imron and other polyurethane coatings.

So the reason this paint exists is primarily to meet government regs on pollution and safety. Since it's overall performance is only touted as "comparable" to Imron etc., then this paint is a regulatory inspired product rather than a quality induced product.
The other performance characteristics listed for this paint do not appear to be any huge reason to use it over the urethanes currently available.
And yea, 2 hours tack time.. what's with that? That tells me that someone who has little experience with paint application will have a heckuva time getting a good finish with it.

Since I wouldn't spray ANY kind of paint, even water based house paint, without a respirator, I don't get too concerned about the carcinogenic qualities of paints anyway.
(As an aside: The most logical reason, I'm told, is that my recent diagnosis of Leukemia likely came from 25 years of working in the auto paint business and therefore frequent exposure to benzene. But if it took 25 YEARS to do that, I wouldn't get too worked up about a wiff of paint fumes once in a while when you paint your RV.)

The bottom line is that the urethanes available now are still the simplest to use, best performing, most durable, and reasonably safe (if used correctly).

But then, this IS all about "experimentation", isn't it.
__________________
RV7-A - Slider (QB Fuse and Wings)
Mattituck IO-360 (AFP) w/2 P-mags
Catto 3-Blade
SJ Cowl and Plenum
Panel: Dual GRT EFIS / EIS4000 / PMA8000B / SL-30 / SL-40 / Internal GRT GPS / GTX 327
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:33 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.