VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-21-2011, 05:17 PM
szicree szicree is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,061
Default

I didn't read the article in sport aviation, but I did look at the pictures and was blown away. My wife saw it and called it Lexus plane. I gotta say after reading Van's reaction that I feel kinda let down. That shoulder harness route looks completely ridiculous and irresponsible. Sorry, but it's true.
__________________
Steve Zicree
Fullerton, Ca. w/beautiful 2.5 year old son
RV-4 99% built and sold
Rag and tube project well under way

paid =VAF= dues through June 2013
  #12  
Old 06-21-2011, 05:55 PM
ProfessorSpeed ProfessorSpeed is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Gundy's O38 (Owasso, OK)
Posts: 15
Default

I hate to see this- one builder being singled out in the most embarrassing way possible. *The concerns are valid, yes, but the approach is woeful. *I was sure hoping for that last paragraph with the happy ending...
  #13  
Old 06-21-2011, 05:57 PM
KirkGrovesRV8 KirkGrovesRV8 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paradise,Pa S37
Posts: 735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProfessorSpeed View Post
I hate to see this- one builder being singled out in the most embarrassing way possible. *The concerns are valid, yes, but the approach is woeful. *I was sure hoping for that last paragraph with the happy ending...
I gotta agree with you I love my RV-8 but have never been a big fan of the mother ship


P.s I have respect for them just not had positive interactions with them
__________________
All the Best ;-)
RV-8
RV-9 once the kids are older

Last edited by KirkGrovesRV8 : 06-21-2011 at 06:00 PM.
  #14  
Old 06-21-2011, 05:58 PM
n5lp's Avatar
n5lp n5lp is offline
fugio ergo sum
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Carlsbad, NM
Posts: 1,912
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProfessorSpeed View Post
I hate to see this- one builder being singled out in the most embarrassing way possible. *The concerns are valid, yes, but the approach is woeful. *I was sure hoping for that last paragraph with the happy ending...
I'm pretty sure that "Sport Aviation" doesn't make you be the focus of a feature article. It is entirely voluntary.
__________________
Larry Pardue
Carlsbad, NM

RV-6 N441LP Flying
  #15  
Old 06-21-2011, 06:12 PM
Pat Stewart Pat Stewart is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Granbury Texas
Posts: 1,136
Default RV10/Van

I must agree, although some very good points, this was a very poor way to handle the concerns. I do not know Greg however I once saw his 8 at an air show, the most beautiful 8 I have ever seen just like the 10. I think Greg represents what this hobby is about, yes there are a few safety issues like the seat belt however the rest is just a bad editorial. This guy may want to do long cross countries by himself and has simply added fuel capacity for that mission. If he wants to carry more passengers he can adjust his fuel load. I think Van is a great guy but this could have been addressed much more professionally.

Pat

Quote:
Originally Posted by Professionally View Post
I hate to see this- one builder being singled out in the most embarrassing way possible. *The concerns are valid, yes, but the approach is woeful. *I was sure hoping for that last paragraph with the happy ending...

Last edited by Pat Stewart : 06-21-2011 at 06:29 PM.
  #16  
Old 06-21-2011, 06:24 PM
apkp777's Avatar
apkp777 apkp777 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 2,053
Default

Great article. However, in regards to the seat belts, I think I would end up with a compressed spine/broken back in a significant crash (among other injuries).

Seems to me that the stock design (which I did NOT modify) will create significant downward force in crash for someone tall like myself (6'3"). Am I wrong about that? (not an engineer, just an A&P)
__________________
Tony Phillips
N524AP, RV 9 (tail wheel)
  #17  
Old 06-21-2011, 06:35 PM
aturner's Avatar
aturner aturner is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Clarion, Pennsylvania
Posts: 551
Default

I think that articles like the one Van wrote provide the community with a great perspective and an important counterweight to articles like Sport Aviation publishes. I really appreciate reading his stuff, and I sure didn't see any hint of anything I would label unprofessional. Van, keep the good articles coming.
__________________
-Andy Turner
RV-10 N784JC
  #18  
Old 06-21-2011, 06:43 PM
schristo@mac.com's Avatar
schristo@mac.com schristo@mac.com is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 990
Default Seatbelts...turbulence, acro, crash...

several reasons for a good restraint system... turbulence, acro, crashing... lots of turbulence and acro... crashing, not so much. The five point harness in my 7 is a good compromise.

Is there a 5th point option on the 10? It looks like he might have been attempting to get better turbulence restraint.
__________________
Stephen

RV7 powered by a lycoming thunderbolt IO-390
turning a whirlwind HRT prop

with more hours flying than building... 2,430 on the hobbs!
ORCA Flight
Race 771
margarita!
  #19  
Old 06-21-2011, 06:47 PM
benbell4140 benbell4140 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: broussard louisiana
Posts: 155
Default

While talking about seatbelts, I thought it was pretty weird that I ordered an entire airplane kit (RV8) and did not receive any type of seatbelts. I guess I have to buy them separately. Who would of guessed...
__________________
Ben Bell
RV8 (sold)
Awaiting Kitfox SS7 kit
  #20  
Old 06-21-2011, 06:49 PM
Louise Hose's Avatar
Louise Hose Louise Hose is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton, Nevada --- A34
Posts: 1,464
Default He asked to be judged

Quote:
Originally Posted by n5lp View Post
I'm pretty sure that "Sport Aviation" doesn't make you be the focus of a feature article. It is entirely voluntary.
Perhaps even more relevant is that the builder submitted his plane for judging. It is entirely appropriate to judge the plane/build.

This situation is a great example of a set of flawed judging standard, IMHO. Give me safety and function over looks. Beautiful plane but I wouldn't want to own or fly in it.

Thanks, Van.
__________________
Louise Hose, Editor of The Homebuilder's Portal by KITPLANES
RV3B, NX13PL "Tsamsiyu" co-builder, TMXIO-320, test platform Legacy G3X/TruTrak avionics suite
RV-6 ?Mikey? (purchased flying) ? Garmin test platform (G3X Touch, GS28 autopilot servos, GTN650 GPS/Nav/Comm,
GNC255 Nav/Com, GA240 audio panel)
RV8, N188PD "Valkyrie" (by marriage)
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.