VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-15-2006, 11:58 AM
briand's Avatar
briand briand is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Grand Rapids MI
Posts: 742
Default Weight Savings From Creating Lightening holes on the V-S Spar Stiff.

Anyone ever weigh their plugs after drilling them in their VS808PP?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-15-2006, 12:29 PM
AX-O's Avatar
AX-O AX-O is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,452
Default

I was wondering the same thing. Is it worth doing?
__________________
Axel
RV-4 fastback thread and Pics
VAF 2020 paid VAF 704
The information that I post is just that; information and my own personal experiences. You need to weight out the pros and cons and make up your own mind/decisions. The pictures posted may not show the final stage or configuration. Build at your own risk.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-15-2006, 12:48 PM
ge9a ge9a is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 167
Default

I didn't weigh mine, but it didn't seem very significant at the time. The small things may not seem worth the effort, but I have taken the position that I'm going to take advantage of all of the 'recommended' weight-saving measures that are in the plans, and I have so far (unless I've missed one or two). I figure all of the little things will all add up to something a little more significant. And almost everyone I have talked to with RV experience says "built it light" and "build it per the plans." So I am. And then I won't feel as guilty when I add something to the panel that I'd like to have there.

Just my 2 cents' worth.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-15-2006, 12:55 PM
AntiGravity's Avatar
AntiGravity AntiGravity is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
Posts: 632
Default Weight saving

I cannot believe someone would be sad enough to care. Oh wait, no I was!
I weighed the VS before I started, and then weighed it again when I was doen. Total saving a whopping 95g! Still, if you can save small amounts in many places you can overall save a large amount. All helps. Of course, I probably added this back in primer but what the heck, a saving is still a saving, right
__________________
Jeff Preou
Hamilton, New Zealand
STATUS: not building anything at all... yet ...
http://www.preou.com
http://www.kitlog.com/users/index.php?user=jpreou
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-15-2006, 01:20 PM
Jekyll Jekyll is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 625
Default

95 grams translates to .209 pounds. Not much weight however, it may be noticeable on the CG as it has a large arm.

People talk of building light and many often consider that to mean removing mass from the design wherever possible. Well, after going through all major components, I've come to the conclusion that this view is marginally misguided. If you avail yourself of all the areas where Vans highlights the option of trimming material for weight reduction, you may save 1.5 pounds, possibly 2. Don't eat that burger on your Saturday flight or you will put that back on. If you start trimming areas not identified by the engineers, then you are assuming responsibility for structural integrity in a manner you may not be qualified for.

Building light means watching what you add to the airframe, not looking for meaningless extra mass to trim. Heavy primer (excess) will add more weight than you can possibly trim away. 3 coats of color followed by 3 layers of clear coat may look very nice but, that's a lot of weight (not to mention a significant aft CG shift). Prop and engine choice - big impact. Panel decisions? See where this is going?

For me, the biggest target for weight reduction is my waistline. I can trim away 80 pounds of excess material without compromising the airframe.

Jekyll
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-15-2006, 01:37 PM
jcoloccia jcoloccia is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,110
Default

It really does come down to WHERE you're trimming the weight. Especially on a -7, anything you can do to get that CG forward is going to help. If I were building an -8, I'd probably not cut them out.

The way I did mine, I cut them out a little smaller than called for in the plans. This just made the measuring easier (i.e. you can be a little sloppy and not sweat it too much....sloppy in my case was I got it in the right position, centered to within about 1/32...I could do better, but no need).

All in all, they added about 1 1/2 hours to the build time for me, including deburing and stuff.
__________________
John Coloccia
www.ballofshame.com
Former builder, but still lurking 'cause you're a pretty cool bunch...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-15-2006, 01:49 PM
Rick6a's Avatar
Rick6a Rick6a is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lake St. Louis, MO.
Posts: 2,346
Default Significant

Quote:
Originally Posted by briand
Anyone ever weigh their plugs after drilling them in their VS808PP?
Yep, check out this thread for my before and after weight observation.
http://www.vansairforce.com/communit...ead.php?t=2445
Rick Galati RV-6A "Darla"
RV-8A empennage done
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-15-2006, 02:36 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vans
Build lightness in!
As you build there will be a number of places that Van's tells to you trim something just to make it lighter. Your call. Me, I'm doing everything I can to make mine as light as possible.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-15-2006, 09:04 PM
Jekyll Jekyll is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 625
Default

My earlier post sounded like I don't remove material where recommended. To the contrary, I do act on those recommnedations when possible. I just don't anticipate much net reduction and realize that my ultimate weight control is in watching what I add. I've got a QB so some of those parts with optional trimming have already been assembled and the factory didn't always do the trim. I am pleased that they made some of the trims. I'm not interested in dissassembling the QB to do those optional trims they passed on.

Back to the waistline issue....... My flight surgeon seconds my weight reduction concept.

Jekyll
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-15-2006, 09:40 PM
AntiGravity's Avatar
AntiGravity AntiGravity is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
Posts: 632
Default Trim yourself!!

Jekyll, this is very true. Not flying yet, but skydiving and I've always been a fast faller. As a jumpmaster it just doesn't look good when gravity takes priority and you leave a student floundering on their own in mid-air . Losing 10kg has helped enormously! I sometimes wonder how my wife and I will fair when we get the -8A built, from a CG perspective. We're only 70kg and 54kg; I guess we'll cross that bridge when we get there! Meanwhile though, I'll save weight where I can, so longer as structural integrity and safety are not compromised...
Blue Skies!!
__________________
Jeff Preou
Hamilton, New Zealand
STATUS: not building anything at all... yet ...
http://www.preou.com
http://www.kitlog.com/users/index.php?user=jpreou
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:41 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.