|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

03-30-2011, 12:27 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,256
|
|
Baffles - choice of rivets
Didn't want to hijack another thread re: 470 vs. 426 rivets, but it raises a question that is relevant to where I am now...
There are several "clips" and angles that are riveted to the inlet ramps and the forward baffles (the ones that go right behind the crankshaft flange/spinner). I think it would look nicer if they were riveted with 426 rivets, but plans call for 470s.
Would I end up just having to redo these later due to failure if I went with flush rivets instead of universal, do you think?
TIA...
Steve
__________________
Steve "Flying Scotsman"
Santa Clarita, CA
PP-ASEL, ASES, Instrument Airplane
RV-7A N660WS flying!
#8,000
|

03-30-2011, 01:08 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,685
|
|
Probably OK
If I were going to do it I would use 1/8" diameter rivets instead of the usual 3/32" flatheads used throughout the airplane. The choice of countersinking or dimpling has to be decided and dimpling creates a slightly deeper/thicker but stronger installation than the countersunk approach. The safer way is to go with the roundheads which have been thoroughly field tested. The baffles do take a beating and I've had to come up with repairs in a couple of places over the 7 years of operation.
Bob Axsom
|

03-30-2011, 01:11 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,256
|
|
Thanks, Bob...yeah, I'm using 1/8 rivets pretty much everywhere. I was just thinking that 426s would look better around all the inlet stuff. It's an aesthetics thing  but I don't want to have to *redo* this stuff unnecessarily. It's been a PITA enough already...
__________________
Steve "Flying Scotsman"
Santa Clarita, CA
PP-ASEL, ASES, Instrument Airplane
RV-7A N660WS flying!
#8,000
|

03-30-2011, 04:30 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lake St. Louis, MO.
Posts: 2,346
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flying Scotsman
.....I was just thinking that 426s would look better around all the inlet stuff. It's an aesthetics thing.......
|
Judgement call. I too think the 426 looks slicker in that particular installation (footsteps too) so I installed the 426 in those areas with no downside perceived. As airframe hours accumulate and the years pass, I seriously doubt the decision will ever prove problematic. Right or wrong, this is just one example of the many builder choices we are all free to decide for ourselves.

__________________
Rick Galati
RV6A N307R"Darla!"
RV-8 N308R "LuLu"
EAA Technical Counselor
Last edited by Rick6a : 03-30-2011 at 04:37 AM.
|

03-30-2011, 06:48 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Winston-Salem, N.C.
Posts: 1,210
|
|
Flush em'
I did all mine with flush rivets, and it looks better, cleans easier and since they are easy to get to with cowls off, it would be no biggie to replace any if they start "smoking". I make my living as a structural specialist in heavy jet overhaul..if your worried,put some pro-seal between the mating surfaces when you shoot them together, and they will never loosen up !
Bill E.
RV-4
N76WE
Advance NC, 8A7
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:03 AM.
|