VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-23-2011, 08:34 AM
lmb118 lmb118 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 39
Arrow IFR Nav Question

I am about midway through my IFR training and need some advise on intersection holds. I can fly them on a sim with 2 VORs, but the problem is my plane has just 1 nav. I know; lots of twisting of the OBS.
Are there any short cuts or tricks to doing this in the real world?
I have a panel mount gps (vfr) and a 496 both with the intersections in the data base for "situational awareness" but I expect those to fail for the check ride.

Learning,
Lynne
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-23-2011, 09:04 AM
pierre smith's Avatar
pierre smith pierre smith is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisville, Ga
Posts: 7,840
Default Lynne...

...use what you have...the 496 is an aid you can use to know when to start your turn at the intersection, while the nav keeps you on the prescribed radial. During the check ride, if he fails the 496 you're gonna be pretty busy twisting knobs

Best,
__________________
Pierre Smith
RV-10, 510 TT
RV6A (Sojourner) 180 HP, Catto 3 Bl (502Hrs), gone...and already missed
Air Tractor AT 502B PT 6-15 Sold
Air Tractor 402 PT-6-20 Sold
EAA Flight Advisor/CFI/Tech Counselor
Louisville, Ga

It's never skill or craftsmanship that completes airplanes, it's the will to do so,
Patrick Kenny, EAA 275132


Dues gladly paid!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-23-2011, 09:35 AM
cfiidon's Avatar
cfiidon cfiidon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Posts: 652
Default Tough but do-able

1. Track using one VOR, use the 496 and quickly verify it with changing the VOR. This would show the examiner that you will "trust yet verify".

2, If during the check ride, the examiner fails the 496, resort to twisting and tuning the other. Do the best you can. If you have already done a couple of turns then your timing will help you out. The hold area is HUGE (think fast moving jet). As long as you stay on the protected side sloppy counts just fine.

3. If you feel brave, when assigned an intersection hold say "unable". In a real world situation, this would be an acceptable response if you felt that accepting an intersection hold with one VOR would be overwhelming and in your opinion as PIC you are "unable" to safely accomplish it. It's easier with a flip flop nav radio but tough with a mechanical, such as an old KX-170. During the check ride, if you explained that you'll give it a try, but you know about the "unable" card, the examiner will take it as you being knowledgeable.

4. If radar is available, ask ATC to verify intersection crossing.

5. Many ways to skin that cat...

Don
__________________
RV-8 QB Titan ECi 191HP XIO-360
WW200RV Dynon D180 HS34 AP74
GNS430 SL30 GTX327 PS8000B Uavionix Echouat
"Pilots are alchemists... we turn gold into lead."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-23-2011, 10:55 AM
DBone DBone is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: McKinney, TX (T31)
Posts: 209
Default my thoughts...

Don echoes my thoughts... Before the flight, talk to your examiner. Tell him what equipment you have in the airplane, and ask him to go over what you're going to do in the air. You will no doubt have to do a partial panel approach of some kind, but I doubt he will ask you to do a partial panel intersection hold.

Like Don said, in real life, if you were partial panel and got an instruction to hold, you would say "unable." The old "real men can fly IFR without a GPS" mentality is a bit overdone sometimes. If in IMC and your 496 failed, I would tell each controller that you are without a GPS. Unless you are flying into really busy airspace, controllers are going to give you vectors and help you out.

Good luck on your check ride!

Dave
__________________
Dave B
McKinney, TX (T31)
N517AD - RV-7A - Sold
N963TP - RV-7A - Partner
N10HW - RV-10 - Partner
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-23-2011, 11:11 AM
Sig600 Sig600 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: KRTS
Posts: 1,798
Default

I spent many years as a CFII and I never had a student need to do an intersection hold on a practical (at least not as described). Unless the practical test standards have changed, you just need to demonstrate holding entry... which can be completed with a procedure turn on an approach, or holding pattern after a missed approach.

Either way, the goal of the hold is to 1.) stay to the protected side and 2.) make out bound adjustments to attain a 1 minute inbound leg. I would avoid using the 496 even as an aide as it's not enroute legal (on the test, not in real world ops).

If you do find yourself in an intersection hold that does not have DME to reference, then yes you'll be doing a lot of twisting. Just remember that EVERYTIME you change the freq you have to identify the source again. So leave the two freqs in the flip/flop, and the ID on your audio panel turned up. By the way, if you slow to max conserve speed (say 90 knots) this will be a lot easier. You most definatley can use the GPS to determine winds aloft to help you out. You shouldn't have to demonstrate more than your ability to enter the hold. Your DE is a real *** if he makes you do all of this!!!!
__________________
Next?, TBD
IAR-823, SOLD
RV-8, SOLD
RV-7, SOLD
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-23-2011, 11:15 AM
vasrv7a vasrv7a is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 188
Default

usually intersections (a fix) will also show distance from a navaid. you should be able to use the distance from the navaid to identify the fix and hold. I did my hold that way this past Sunday (2/20/11) and passed my check ride!!

Good luck.

Victor
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-23-2011, 11:26 AM
Sig600 Sig600 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: KRTS
Posts: 1,798
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vasrv7a View Post
usually intersections (a fix) will also show distance from a navaid. you should be able to use the distance from the navaid to identify the fix and hold. I did my hold that way this past Sunday (2/20/11) and passed my check ride!!

Good luck.

Victor
Not all intersections are defined via DME. While there may be a "leg length" donoted on the chart, unless properly labled you can not legally hold off distance.

Case in point:

Holding at LIMMO, assuming that little arrow wasn't there, you couldn't define the intersection off of the leg length of 20. You would have to use the two radials.

HYZER however is only defined by DME, so unless you have DME (or an enroute GPS) on board, you can't identify that either... "legally."


__________________
Next?, TBD
IAR-823, SOLD
RV-8, SOLD
RV-7, SOLD

Last edited by Sig600 : 02-23-2011 at 11:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-23-2011, 12:37 PM
Brantel's Avatar
Brantel Brantel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newport, TN
Posts: 7,496
Default

What kind of Nav do you have?
__________________
Brantel (Brian Chesteen),
Check out my RV-10 builder's BLOG
RV-10, #41942, N?????, Project Sold
---------------------------------------------------------------------
RV-7/TU, #72823, N159SB
Lyc. O-360 carbed, HARTZELL BA CS Prop, Dual P-MAGs, Dual Garmin G3X Touch
Track N159SB (KK4LIF)
Like EAA Chapter 1494 on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-23-2011, 12:54 PM
vasrv7a vasrv7a is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sig600 View Post
Not all intersections are defined via DME. While there may be a "leg length" donoted on the chart, unless properly labled you can not legally hold off distance.

Case in point:

Holding at LIMMO, assuming that little arrow wasn't there, you couldn't define the intersection off of the leg length of 20. You would have to use the two radials.

HYZER however is only defined by DME, so unless you have DME (or an enroute GPS) on board, you can't identify that either... "legally."


Based on what you have said, can you legally hold at NUCIS because distance looks to be the only way that the fix is identified?

Thanx for your explanations.

Victor
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-23-2011, 01:11 PM
John Clark's Avatar
John Clark John Clark is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,324
Default Checkride

Lynne,

It all depends on the examiner, but in most cases simple is better. The more equipment available, the more failures you are going to have and more questions will be asked. In your case, I would suggest getting comfortable doing single VOR holds. In my experience, examiners will only get tough when they sense weakness. Many times I have been given holding instructions on a checkride and before we get to the fix the examiner will ask something like "What kind of entry are you going to do?" or "Which way are you going to turn?" If you answer the question without breaking a sweat, you will never have to enter the hold. Blow the response and you will get to fly every entry in the book.

Relax, never rush, and enjoy your new "ticket."

John Clark ATP, CFI
FAA FAAST Team Member
EAA Flight Advisor
RV8 N18U "Sunshine"
KSBA
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:51 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.