VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2011, 11:39 AM
RViter RViter is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 242
Default Ring gears - What's up with 122/149 teeth?

What is the purpose or application of the different starter ring-gear teeth count? Why 122 or 149? Is this optional for some reason? or related to a specification? (12 vs 24v, for example). Are they either/or? Does the starter have to 'match' the gear tooth shape?

I have a prop-strike O-360-A3A to repair, evaluate, and the starter housing was cracked, too. Planned to replace it with a SkyTec or B&C lightweight, so it's not a factor. The engine was salvaged without the prop or flywheel/ring-gear, so there is no indication of which flavor it had (off Cherokee 180). So, is the 122/149 decision a factor or is there a pre-defined specification to follow on acquisition of these replacement parts? otherwise, why?

THANKS!!

gary christensen
Mesa AZ
RV-6A Finishing Kit
O360-A3A (repairable)
N234GB (reserved)
www.mykitlog.com/garyc
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-13-2011, 02:09 PM
Toobuilder's Avatar
Toobuilder Toobuilder is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,642
Default

IIRC, the 122 version was dropped some years ago. To answer your question directly, either ring gear will work fine on pretty much any engine, but the starter pinion should match. A mismatch between the starter and ring gear will cause accelerated wear, but beyond that it's not a huge deal.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.

Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-13-2011, 05:33 PM
RViter RViter is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 242
Default Excellent clarification

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toobuilder View Post
IIRC, the 122 version was dropped some years ago. To answer your question directly, either ring gear will work fine on pretty much any engine, but the starter pinion should match. A mismatch between the starter and ring gear will cause accelerated wear, but beyond that it's not a huge deal.
Excellent clarification - about what I suspected but matching the gear configuration makes perfect sense to keep the teeth face properly aligned. I would speculate that mismatched one way, less of a factor, but the other way would be significantly more. The contact surface would shift.

THANKS - I'll be looking for a flywheel with 149 teeth on the ring gear, and specify same configuration for the new starter.

Probably too much to hope that almost all of the O-320/360 flywheels are identical as it would appear to have no reason to modify the design, and the ring-gears would be applied, as desired, over the decades. Essentially making the flywheel totally common and the gear ring selectable.

THANKS Again - Gary
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-13-2011, 07:46 PM
Toobuilder's Avatar
Toobuilder Toobuilder is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,642
Default

Just as a data point - the ring gear is available by itself. It can be pressed off the "ring gear support".
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.

Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-17-2011, 04:50 AM
pmnewlon pmnewlon is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RViter View Post
Probably too much to hope that almost all of the O-320/360 flywheels are identical as it would appear to have no reason to modify the design, and the ring-gears would be applied, as desired, over the decades. Essentially making the flywheel totally common and the gear ring selectable.

THANKS Again - Gary
My engine has three different ring gear support assemblies available. Lycoming has parts catalogs available for download for all their engines, which specify the different support assy and ring gear options. PM sent.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:35 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.