VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-06-2006, 05:01 AM
Captain_John's Avatar
Captain_John Captain_John is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: KPYM
Posts: 2,686
Default

If I were doing an -8, I would go with a nice Para valve 180 hp + engine. It works out better CG-wise.

Jeff, I am curious why you think the -9 is a better travelling machine? The -7 will cover more ground faster. Put an autopilot in any travelling machine and the -7 makes a better platform.

CJ
__________________
RV-7 Flying - 1,200 Hours in 5 Years!
The experiment works!
TMX-IO-360, G3i ignition & G3X with VP-X
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-06-2006, 06:14 AM
n615ks's Avatar
n615ks n615ks is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bettendorf, Iowa
Posts: 70
Default IO-390 price

I'm budgeting (?) for an engine purchase late next year and just received a quote on the 390, including the latest price increase. Includes Slick mags, AFP fuel, Christen invert oil, Skytec starter, etc........$35K plus change I had printed a note from the forum earlier this year where the same setup was going for just under 30K. Oh well.
Marc, do you mind stating what you paid for your 390?

Thanks
__________________
Bill Swaim
Slow Build RV-7 IO-375-M1S is installed
FWF done - Wiring & Panel Complete
Cowl primed - Prop & spinner done.
Windshield and the other 80% yet to go......
Going for a new 'slow build' record!
N615KS Reserved Bettendorf, IA
2014 Donation has been paid
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-06-2006, 08:00 AM
osxuser's Avatar
osxuser osxuser is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sprucemoose
Hmm. Just curious why you're not considering a 9 instead of a 7? The 9 seems more like a traveling machine.
I did CONSIDER a 9, but I figure it this way:

Either way I'll have a 2-axis autopilot
I want to run 180+hp so the -9 doesn't support that engine
The -7 is faster
if I'm spending the money, the -7 can do light acro, not something i'd mind...
the -7 is worth more when I go to sell...

So, thats why I've got a -7 (which I guess is partly -9) tail sitting in the hanger... I need to change my sig to building -7 tail... finally started some real work on it .
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-06-2006, 10:25 AM
sprucemoose's Avatar
sprucemoose sprucemoose is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MKE
Posts: 1,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_John
Jeff, I am curious why you think the -9 is a better travelling machine?
I meant that it's designed to be more stable, less responsive, typically qualities associated with cross country flying as opposed to "sport" flying.
__________________
Jeff Point
RV-6, RLU-1 built & flying
Tech Counselor, Flight Advisor & President, EAA Chapter 18
Milwaukee
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-06-2006, 11:28 AM
MCA's Avatar
MCA MCA is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 693
Default

Bill,

It seems there was just a price increase. The current prices are posted at http://www.aerosportpower.com/Prices.htm which is where I got the engine. I paid a few grand less, and ordered it right after OSH last year. I am told there are now five different shops that make/sell the -390 from Lycoming parts kit.

Incredibly, it is about $3,400 CHEAPER than the IO-360-A1B6. Go figure. If I was Lycoming, I'd price by horsepower.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-06-2006, 05:26 PM
Captain_John's Avatar
Captain_John Captain_John is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: KPYM
Posts: 2,686
Default

SMoose, I unserstand... I guess that I am biased...



MCA... How does it sound!?! DOes it sound different than a 360? Deeper? Louder? Does it go BRAP BRAP BRAP!?!

CJ
__________________
RV-7 Flying - 1,200 Hours in 5 Years!
The experiment works!
TMX-IO-360, G3i ignition & G3X with VP-X
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-07-2006, 02:17 AM
osxuser's Avatar
osxuser osxuser is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
Default

The 390 is cheaper than an A1B6 because it isn't certified.
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-22-2016, 10:56 AM
flynwest flynwest is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 377
Default IO 390 fuel burn

I have an 8 with the IO 390 and has around 900 hours on it. Last year I went with Rosie's group to the West Indies and one of the planes in my group was a 9 with a 0 320 I burned less fuel at every fuel stop than he did. I was pulled back and LOP.
__________________
Horse Power is good, more is better and
Too Much is Just Right
RV 8 Super charged Barrett IO-390
Dues paid 2020
Dan "Nordo" West
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-22-2016, 11:13 AM
MercFE MercFE is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 273
Default

Nearly 10 year resurrection on this thread...
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:40 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.