VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-23-2010, 07:42 PM
David-aviator David-aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 4,514
Default

If you are inclined to build, go with the 7.

If you are inclined to buy and fly, go with the 6.

Either way you can't go wrong. These machines are a delight to fly.

I take off for any reason - today it was to search for that deer I hit on Sunday. No sign of hide. hair or it. Maybe a hunter picked it up, the season was open that day and the deer may have been on the run because of it. I've ID'd the exact spot where it came on the road and it is all brush and tall grass on both sides. The front license plate was missing and that's where I found it, pure luck I'd say.
__________________
RV-12 Build Helper
RV-7A...Sold #70374
The RV-8...Sold #83261
I'm in, dues paid 2019 This place is worth it!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-23-2010, 08:18 PM
Jaypratt's Avatar
Jaypratt Jaypratt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hicks Airfield, Fort Worth,Texas
Posts: 1,728
Default Better....,

My $ .02

The RV6 is a little shorter than a RV7. so....The RV7 has better pitch stability.
The RV7 has more fuel. More Better!
The RV7 has longer ailerons, 4". Better roll rate.
The RV 7 has more head room, More Better...........
I have flown, and built two RV6s, one had 500 hours, and the second one had 998 hours when I let it go. I have some 125+ hours in RV7s .
I did not think the RV7 would interest me untill I had a chance to fly several and use them as my own airplane.
The RV7 is a Better airplane, hands down.
I did not think I would like it when it first came the out. Or that I would need the 'improvements' that the 6 does not have. But the RV7 is a Better all round airplane than the 6. It is easer to build as well.
__________________
Jay Pratt VAF #2
RV Central - Builder Assistance
Paul Revere, Borrowed Horse, & Shooter
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-23-2010, 08:29 PM
Ron Lee's Avatar
Ron Lee Ron Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,275
Default

Good arguments Jay. But for someone buying a 6 or 7, would you say that the typical higher cost for a 7 is worth it?

If someone were to give me my choice of a 6 or 7 aircraft, I would probably take the 7(A). But I bought a 6A.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-23-2010, 08:37 PM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

Too bad the larger counter balance tails of the 7's just look over sized & not dimensionally correct...........compared to the shorter, sportier, and eye pleasing "classic" tail of the original 6's.

L.Adamson --- RV6A (classic tail)
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-23-2010, 08:44 PM
Jaypratt's Avatar
Jaypratt Jaypratt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hicks Airfield, Fort Worth,Texas
Posts: 1,728
Default price

Buying or building?
Buying, a flying RV ? A RV6 is my choice. Since money is a limiting factor.

If money was no factor??? I would own 2 Grumand F8F Bearcats
one to fly when the other is down for mantience,,, No RVs for this hipothetical bizzilionair
__________________
Jay Pratt VAF #2
RV Central - Builder Assistance
Paul Revere, Borrowed Horse, & Shooter

Last edited by Jaypratt : 11-23-2010 at 08:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-24-2010, 09:15 AM
JonJay's Avatar
JonJay JonJay is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Battleground
Posts: 4,348
Default Are you sure Jay?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaypratt View Post
My $ .02

The RV7 has longer ailerons, 4". Better roll rate.
.
I have not rolled a 7 but I have an 8 and my 6 rolls faster. I would assume a 7rolls just like an 8 or very similar. I searched the archives and this is a common opinion. Regardless, the difference is minimal and I would not make my choice on that alone.
I still prefer my 6, 'cause that's what I own!
__________________
Smart People do Stupid things all the time. I know, I've seen me do'em.

RV6 - Builder/Flying
Bucker Jungmann
Fiat G.46 -(restoration in progress, if I have enough life left in me)
RV1 - Proud Pilot.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-24-2010, 09:23 AM
jjconstant's Avatar
jjconstant jjconstant is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oakland CA
Posts: 771
Default landing gear

One other difference not mentioned...on the A models, the 6A sits a bit nose high on the ground and the 7A is almost level. Slight difference in taxi visibility, the 7 "looks" larger sitting on the ground and there may be some implications for rough surface operations but I don't want to cause thread creep!

Jeremy Constant
7A 90hrs, about to start my 1rst condition inspection!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-24-2010, 01:25 PM
Snowflake's Avatar
Snowflake Snowflake is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,932
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaypratt View Post
The RV7 has longer ailerons, 4". Better roll rate.
You'd think so, but it has longer wings, too, which results in an overall slower roll rate.

Having rolled both, I would say the -6 feels like it's rolling faster... But the difference isn't large enough to consider as a serious factor. They're effectively the same for the type of flying the RV was designed for... "gentlemanly aerobatics" I think Van calls it.
__________________
Rob Prior
1996 RV-6 "Tweety" C-FRBP (formerly N196RV)
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-24-2010, 06:03 PM
Pmerems's Avatar
Pmerems Pmerems is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 818
Default Not too much larger span

Gents,

The RV-7's have a different wing tip design then the RV-6's. The new style angles out and adds about 6" per side. I doubt very seriously that this area adds any real performance improvements or degrades performance.

So the real effective span difference is about 1ft total.

I actually prefer the look of the old style tips over the batwings and the new style.
__________________
Dream it, Build it, Fly it

Paul Merems (EAA Tech Counselor, EAA Sheetmetal Workshop Instructor/Volunteer 12 yrs)
ExperimentalAero-HANGAR BANNERS
www.experimentalaero.com
RV-7A (Flying since 2010)/RV-4 (sold 1990)
Tucson, Arizona 85749
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-24-2010, 06:33 PM
Martin Sutter Martin Sutter is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 266
Default

It is not just the tip, the wings are longer too. Wing span for a 7 is 25' versus the RV6's 23'. There is also more leg and head room available. I have flown a 6 for 2500 hrs and a 7A for 600 hrs. and would agree with most of the previous comments. The most notable differences for me are the 7's greater load carrying capacity due to the larger wing area and more favorable CG envelope and the better directional stability due to the much larger tail. Both are great flying airplanes and I love them both.

Martin Sutter
building and flying RV's since 1988
EAA Technical Counselor
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.