|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

11-02-2010, 08:08 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 406
|
|
RV-8 short field ops
I found this video from a Barnstormers ad (the RV-8 in the video is for sale) and was impressed with the carrier landings. I practice short field t/o and landing every now and then, but they sure don't look like this!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvan9...layer_embedded
__________________
Ryan
Tampa, FL
RV-4 (sold)
RV-8 (sold)
Xtreme Decathlon (borrowing)
|

11-02-2010, 08:48 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 664
|
|
Comments from the peanut gallery...if you're gonna post something like this  ...He could have touched down a good bit slower and been more precise with his touchdown point. Especially for the second landing it looked like he touched down in a level (fast) wheelie attitude about 100' past the threshold of usable length. He could have made a slower approach with power, then pulled the power off while touching down precisely past the end of the strip, as slow as practical (3-point) and then pushing it over onto the wheels for max braking. Good that he was practicing at a strip with a clear departure should he have botched one.
|

11-02-2010, 08:54 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Atlanta
Posts: 1,120
|
|
Poor airplane.
__________________
Sid Lambert
RV-7 Sold
RV-4 - Flying - O-320 Fixed Pitch - Red over Yellow
|

11-02-2010, 09:53 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,344
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandifer
He could have made a slower approach with power, then pulled the power off while touching down precisely past the end of the strip .
|
This is a good point as I was practicing my short field landing and pulled the power just a tad too soon, causing a hard landing that was followed by a go-around. Just one more reason why I need to practice 
__________________
Mehrdad
N825SM RV7A - IO360M1B - SOLD
N825MS RV14A - IO390 - Flying
Dues paid
|

11-02-2010, 10:55 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 406
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandifer
Comments from the peanut gallery...if you're gonna post something like this  ...He could have touched down a good bit slower and been more precise with his touchdown point. Especially for the second landing it looked like he touched down in a level (fast) wheelie attitude about 100' past the threshold of usable length. He could have made a slower approach with power, then pulled the power off while touching down precisely past the end of the strip, as slow as practical (3-point) and then pushing it over onto the wheels for max braking. Good that he was practicing at a strip with a clear departure should he have botched one.
|
Yeah, I thought the touchdown attitude looked a bit flat (as opposed to a nose-high 3-point attitude.) Still a shorter strip than I'd be comfortable with....maybe that's my clue to practice more.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid Lambert
Poor airplane.
|
Agreed - that landing gear (grove) seems to be getting a regular workout.
__________________
Ryan
Tampa, FL
RV-4 (sold)
RV-8 (sold)
Xtreme Decathlon (borrowing)
|

11-02-2010, 01:15 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 125
|
|
Given his tail position at the first landing (low, indicating little excess energy) and nice touchdown point (looks to be within 30ft or something like that) I think we are sounding a bit harsh in the reviews of his landings.
I pull my craft in with power myself, but from a safety point of view it is not always the best solution.
jm2c
__________________
-----
RV-4, O-320, FP
CFII/MEI & dreamer
Last edited by matt : 11-02-2010 at 01:20 PM.
|

11-02-2010, 02:22 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 664
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt
Given his tail position at the first landing (low, indicating little excess energy) and nice touchdown point (looks to be within 30ft or something like that) I think we are sounding a bit harsh in the reviews of his landings.
|
First one was OK, second one not so much. Mainly it shows inconsistency of technique. I'm not trying to knock him, but this video was presented in the context of short field landing critique. #2 would have been a fine landing at a county airport. Regardless of whether you normally fly power-on or off approaches, serious and accurate short-field work done with any consistency requires power and an approach made much slower than you'd normally fly power-off. Again, post video, expect comments from the peanut gallery.  If you're looking for folks to tell you how great you are, then you need to get into airshow flying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt
I pull my craft in with power myself, but from a safety point of view it is not always the best solution.
|
Are you talking about short-field work or a normal landing? Again, unless you're doing max performance short-field work, there's no need to carry power on approach in an RV...or almost any other SEL airplane.
|

11-03-2010, 08:37 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TX32
Posts: 1,890
|
|
It depends...
My home strip is currently 1500' usable with obstacles on both ends, which gives you an "opportunity to excel" on every approach and landing. My experience shows most people fly final too fast, over correct on obstacle clearance and equate touchdown point correction to pitch. A short field landing is very similar to a carrier approach, proper glide-path, descent angle and power vice pitch for TD point corrections.
If you practice flying final using AOA (as in the F16), max performance on final requires power to maintain approach angle to control your TD point. For a power off approach the pitch angle is lower on approach however to touchdown on "brick one" you have to establish proper AOA prior to TD point. AOA not airspeed for FAS. This technique works for every aircraft, maximum/optimum lift coefficient to touchdown. http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal...eserve-pg2.htm
However, when your available runway length is less than 1000', you do what you have to do
Smokey
HR2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XYFc...eature=related
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...13544677169405
Last edited by smokyray : 11-03-2010 at 05:58 PM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:51 AM.
|