VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV Photo/Video URLs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-2010, 08:08 AM
RBD's Avatar
RBD RBD is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 406
Default RV-8 short field ops

I found this video from a Barnstormers ad (the RV-8 in the video is for sale) and was impressed with the carrier landings. I practice short field t/o and landing every now and then, but they sure don't look like this!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvan9...layer_embedded
__________________
Ryan
Tampa, FL
RV-4 (sold)
RV-8 (sold)
Xtreme Decathlon (borrowing)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-02-2010, 08:48 AM
sandifer sandifer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 664
Default

Comments from the peanut gallery...if you're gonna post something like this ...He could have touched down a good bit slower and been more precise with his touchdown point. Especially for the second landing it looked like he touched down in a level (fast) wheelie attitude about 100' past the threshold of usable length. He could have made a slower approach with power, then pulled the power off while touching down precisely past the end of the strip, as slow as practical (3-point) and then pushing it over onto the wheels for max braking. Good that he was practicing at a strip with a clear departure should he have botched one.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-02-2010, 08:54 AM
Sid Lambert Sid Lambert is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Atlanta
Posts: 1,120
Default

Poor airplane.
__________________
Sid Lambert

RV-7 Sold
RV-4 - Flying - O-320 Fixed Pitch - Red over Yellow

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-02-2010, 09:53 AM
Bavafa Bavafa is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandifer View Post
He could have made a slower approach with power, then pulled the power off while touching down precisely past the end of the strip .
This is a good point as I was practicing my short field landing and pulled the power just a tad too soon, causing a hard landing that was followed by a go-around. Just one more reason why I need to practice
__________________
Mehrdad
N825SM RV7A - IO360M1B - SOLD
N825MS RV14A - IO390 - Flying
Dues paid
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-02-2010, 10:55 AM
RBD's Avatar
RBD RBD is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandifer View Post
Comments from the peanut gallery...if you're gonna post something like this ...He could have touched down a good bit slower and been more precise with his touchdown point. Especially for the second landing it looked like he touched down in a level (fast) wheelie attitude about 100' past the threshold of usable length. He could have made a slower approach with power, then pulled the power off while touching down precisely past the end of the strip, as slow as practical (3-point) and then pushing it over onto the wheels for max braking. Good that he was practicing at a strip with a clear departure should he have botched one.
Yeah, I thought the touchdown attitude looked a bit flat (as opposed to a nose-high 3-point attitude.) Still a shorter strip than I'd be comfortable with....maybe that's my clue to practice more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid Lambert View Post
Poor airplane.
Agreed - that landing gear (grove) seems to be getting a regular workout.
__________________
Ryan
Tampa, FL
RV-4 (sold)
RV-8 (sold)
Xtreme Decathlon (borrowing)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-02-2010, 01:15 PM
matt matt is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 125
Default

Given his tail position at the first landing (low, indicating little excess energy) and nice touchdown point (looks to be within 30ft or something like that) I think we are sounding a bit harsh in the reviews of his landings.

I pull my craft in with power myself, but from a safety point of view it is not always the best solution.

jm2c
__________________
-----
RV-4, O-320, FP
CFII/MEI & dreamer

Last edited by matt : 11-02-2010 at 01:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-02-2010, 02:22 PM
sandifer sandifer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 664
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matt View Post
Given his tail position at the first landing (low, indicating little excess energy) and nice touchdown point (looks to be within 30ft or something like that) I think we are sounding a bit harsh in the reviews of his landings.
First one was OK, second one not so much. Mainly it shows inconsistency of technique. I'm not trying to knock him, but this video was presented in the context of short field landing critique. #2 would have been a fine landing at a county airport. Regardless of whether you normally fly power-on or off approaches, serious and accurate short-field work done with any consistency requires power and an approach made much slower than you'd normally fly power-off. Again, post video, expect comments from the peanut gallery. If you're looking for folks to tell you how great you are, then you need to get into airshow flying.

Quote:
Originally Posted by matt View Post
I pull my craft in with power myself, but from a safety point of view it is not always the best solution.
Are you talking about short-field work or a normal landing? Again, unless you're doing max performance short-field work, there's no need to carry power on approach in an RV...or almost any other SEL airplane.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-03-2010, 08:37 AM
smokyray's Avatar
smokyray smokyray is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TX32
Posts: 1,890
Default It depends...

My home strip is currently 1500' usable with obstacles on both ends, which gives you an "opportunity to excel" on every approach and landing. My experience shows most people fly final too fast, over correct on obstacle clearance and equate touchdown point correction to pitch. A short field landing is very similar to a carrier approach, proper glide-path, descent angle and power vice pitch for TD point corrections.

If you practice flying final using AOA (as in the F16), max performance on final requires power to maintain approach angle to control your TD point. For a power off approach the pitch angle is lower on approach however to touchdown on "brick one" you have to establish proper AOA prior to TD point. AOA not airspeed for FAS. This technique works for every aircraft, maximum/optimum lift coefficient to touchdown. http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal...eserve-pg2.htm

However, when your available runway length is less than 1000', you do what you have to do

Smokey
HR2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XYFc...eature=related
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...13544677169405

Last edited by smokyray : 11-03-2010 at 05:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:51 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.