VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-22-2010, 04:14 PM
dwilson dwilson is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 433
Default Tail mounted battery and ground return?

Building an RV-10 and plan to put the batteries in the tail. Using Bob N.'s Z-14 diagram.

Question is, do I need to run a AWG#2 all the way back to the - side of the battery from the engine compartment or just ground the engine braid to the firewall and ground the battery to the airframe and let the airframe take the current back to the battery from the starter/alternator?

Thanks,
__________________
Duane Wilson

RV9A. Built, flew 1000 hours, Sold

RV10 Built, flying 330 hours so far.

Central Oregon
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-22-2010, 04:20 PM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is offline
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,408
Default

The RV 10 uses a rear battery, and airframe for a ground path.

Works just fine.

If you want to spent the $$$, and carry the weight, you might realize a small advantage with a dedicated ground. But I suspect the difference will be somewhere between unnoticeable, to not worth the trouble.

BTW, these are scientific terms.....
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909

Rv-10, N210LM.

Flying as of 12/4/2010

Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011

Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.

"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."

Last edited by Mike S : 10-22-2010 at 04:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-23-2010, 08:53 AM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
Default

I suspect that this thread could grow to a very great length with the debate on local versus common ground - but I'll add my experience to Mike's thoughts - more than three decades of flying airplanes with the rear mounted batteries grounded locally, and never had a problem. The airframe is a pretty good return!
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-23-2010, 09:02 AM
dwilson dwilson is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 433
Default Thanks,

I appreciate your input Mike and Paul.

That is kind of what I figured, but it is nice to have an outside opinion.

I will be grounding locally.
__________________
Duane Wilson

RV9A. Built, flew 1000 hours, Sold

RV10 Built, flying 330 hours so far.

Central Oregon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-23-2010, 09:17 AM
apkp777's Avatar
apkp777 apkp777 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 2,053
Default

It's a good idea to use an aluminum "bonding brush" available from the "yard". Really assures good conductivity.

http://www.yardstore.com/browse.cfm/4,5948.html
__________________
Tony Phillips
N524AP, RV 9 (tail wheel)
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:51 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.