|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

10-07-2010, 11:25 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Walnut Creek CA
Posts: 513
|
|
NACA vent IN the cowl cheek
Would a NACA vent work if it was mounted in the cowl cheek? It wouldnt take much to cut and mount them to my fiberglass cowl cheeks.
Thanks,
Rob
__________________
Rob Holmes
www.myrv3.com
N59LG
The minimum number of planes one should own is one. The correct number is n+1, where n is the number of planes currently owned. This equation may also be re-written as s-1, where s is the number of planes owned that would result in separation from your partner.
- Veluminati
|

10-07-2010, 11:38 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,061
|
|
I would think that such a convex surface would be an area of low pressure. You might end up pulling air out of the cockpit.
__________________
Steve Zicree
Fullerton, Ca. w/beautiful 2.5 year old son 
RV-4 99% built  and sold 
Rag and tube project well under way
paid =VAF= dues through June 2013
|

10-07-2010, 03:13 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA
Posts: 938
|
|
Is this for cabin air, engine or oil cooling? Don't use a NACA duct (curved divergent submerged duct) unless you have the design data and can size it appropriately for your application. There is also a parallel-wall sumerged duct that is part of the same family that is much better when you want very high duct airflow. It is better than the CDSD when the velocity of the air through the duct is 0.5 or greater than the free-stream velocity. It uses a square aperture which interfaces to a round duct easier than the 4:1 to 6:1 CDSD aperture and also uses the 7 degree ramp for best pressure recovery. It should be 8.1 times as long as the aperture height-width to give the 7 degrees. A steeper ramp than this invites separation.
|

10-07-2010, 08:23 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Stilwell, KS
Posts: 1,096
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elippse
There is also a parallel-wall sumerged duct that is part of the same family that is much better when you want very high duct airflow. It is better than the CDSD when the velocity of the air through the duct is 0.5 or greater than the free-stream velocity. It uses a square aperture which interfaces to a round duct easier than the 4:1 to 6:1 CDSD aperture and also uses the 7 degree ramp for best pressure recovery. It should be 8.1 times as long as the aperture height-width to give the 7 degrees. A steeper ramp than this invites separation.
|
 Um, does that come in English?
__________________
Katie Bosman
RV-3B sold, but flying!
Next project: ???
Builders gonna build...
|

10-07-2010, 08:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA
Posts: 938
|
|
Well, Katie, that must be some of the Latin I got in Catholic schools showing through!
|

10-07-2010, 08:50 PM
|
 |
fugio ergo sum
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Carlsbad, NM
Posts: 1,912
|
|
Is this what you are talking about? I don't know how well it works, I just took the picture.

__________________
Larry Pardue
Carlsbad, NM
RV-6 N441LP Flying
Last edited by n5lp : 10-07-2010 at 08:56 PM.
|

10-07-2010, 09:36 PM
|
 |
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
|
|
I thought of your recent pictures when I saw the question Larry - thanks for posting it! I do wonder how effective it is on that curved surface though - true NACA ducts are harder to implement than people think. In my case, I have other plans for the cheek cowls, so I am looking elsewhere for cooling air....
Paul
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
|

10-08-2010, 07:41 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,061
|
|
Not sure if it works, but IMHO it doesn't look very good.
__________________
Steve Zicree
Fullerton, Ca. w/beautiful 2.5 year old son 
RV-4 99% built  and sold 
Rag and tube project well under way
paid =VAF= dues through June 2013
|

10-08-2010, 07:45 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 481
|
|
LOL!!!!!!
I was thinking the same thing Katie.
DM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KatieB
 Um, does that come in English?
|
|

10-08-2010, 08:27 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Walnut Creek CA
Posts: 513
|
|
Yeah I thought they would look interesting there, then I happened across pictures of johns plane "hack job". I just talked to him about their effectiveness and it's sounds like they don't work very well at low pattern speeds. It looks like I'll be pulling fresh air from somewhere else. I might end up stuffing the inverted oil tank in the cheeks.
__________________
Rob Holmes
www.myrv3.com
N59LG
The minimum number of planes one should own is one. The correct number is n+1, where n is the number of planes currently owned. This equation may also be re-written as s-1, where s is the number of planes owned that would result in separation from your partner.
- Veluminati
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:52 AM.
|