|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

09-08-2010, 07:36 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,275
|
|
Quickest lower 48 US states tour
KentB is off again, over MS. Is there a way to easily determine the shortest routing that would cover all 48 states? I don't mean manually.
Starting point is not relevant.
|

09-08-2010, 09:29 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: santa barbara, CA
Posts: 1,681
|
|
I remember from many years ago that the problem of finding the shortest route given multiple destinations had defied mathematicians for ages. There were various approaches that yielded "good" routes, but no guarantee that it was the absolute shortest. Now that we are in the computer age, it may be that the brute-force method of trying them all is feasible in many cases. Gonna have to google this and see what the latest is.
erich
|

09-08-2010, 09:50 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: santa barbara, CA
Posts: 1,681
|
|
More than you ever wanted to know...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travell...lesman_problem
Much of this is way over my head, but I get the general idea that the problem is non-trivial, and the time required to find an exact solution increases exponentially with the number of desired destinations. Once you get more than about 20 destinations, you would have a very long wait to come up with the best route, even using modern computers.
erich
|

09-08-2010, 02:29 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 4,428
|
|
Assuming that the specific question can even be answered, there are a few other constraints to add in, like winds aloft and other potential weather difficulties, fuel availability, and perhaps even TFRs. These can all delay or even make a particular destination impossible in the optimal sequence.
All this suggests that finding a useable, robust route might be a better real-world solution.
In other words, treat the problem like an engineering problem ("Get it good enough and press on," as Mark Drela put it) rather than as a scientific problem, where a theoretical state of perfection is the goal.
|

09-08-2010, 04:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,208
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by erich weaver
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travell...lesman_problem
Much of this is way over my head, but I get the general idea that the problem is non-trivial, and the time required to find an exact solution increases exponentially with the number of desired destinations. Once you get more than about 20 destinations, you would have a very long wait to come up with the best route, even using modern computers.
erich
|
We studied this problem back in my days as an Industrial Engineering student. This problem fascinated the Operations Research folks (who were the hardcore academic types in the IE realm) and they loved talking about it. All because there was no easy technique to optimize the route. As Eric points out, with enough computing power, enough time, and a small enough set of destinations, it could be brute forced, but it isn't easy.
The first rule for this kind of thing is that the optimum path never crosses itself. That's a starting point for creating a good route. For more information, you'll need to call a grad student or a professer who deals in Operations Research. I'm sure that'll be enlightenng. ;-)
__________________
Kyle Boatright
Marietta, GA
2001 RV-6 N46KB
2019(?) RV-10
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM.
|