VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-28-2010, 11:28 AM
Raiz Raiz is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 80
Default Popularity of Trigear vs Taildragger by model

I'm NOT trying to start a "which end is best for the 3rd wheel debate" but this graph might interest some of you. It shows how many RV-6s, 7s, 8s and 9s of each type are flying in the US.



The percentage splits for each model are:
RV-6A 49%, RV-6 51%
RV-7A 61%, RV-7 39%
RV-8A 22%, RV-8 78%
RV-9A 90%, RV-9 10%

The data comes from the FAA register and only includes aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. I assume the reason the numbers are a lower than those from the hobbs meter is that foreign registered aircraft are not included.

Raiz
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-28-2010, 12:03 PM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiz View Post
I assume the reason the numbers are a lower than those from the hobbs meter is that foreign registered aircraft are not included.
They are also lower because a lot of kitbuilder's don't regster their aircrfat as a "Van's RV-X"....they call it a "Whiz-Bang 6" or whatever they wish....
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-28-2010, 03:27 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

Before the taildragger RV-9 came out the tri-gear 9's were RV-9's, no A's. Same as the RV-10 and -12's. Thus the number of 9's vs 9A's will not be correct.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html

Last edited by N941WR : 08-28-2010 at 04:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-28-2010, 03:47 PM
apkp777's Avatar
apkp777 apkp777 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 2,053
Default

I'd would really like to know how many -9's are built or being built as a tailwheel. Even from the data in the graph I am sure tail wheel -9's represent a comparatively small % of the model -9(A). I am surprised that there are so many 7a's
__________________
Tony Phillips
N524AP, RV 9 (tail wheel)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-28-2010, 04:52 PM
jsharkey's Avatar
jsharkey jsharkey is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bennington, Vermont USA
Posts: 1,301
Default Mine is an RV-6

Van did a good job designing the tail draggers. They are short, and have short and low wings giving them low rotational moments of inertia in roll and yaw on the ground. In addition they have a wide and stabilizing main gear wheel base. They also have a decent tail wheel design.

In summary they are the easiest tail draggers I have flown.

A Cub has a long high wing that wants to "wag". In addition it has a narrow foot print - a bit like landing with your ankles bound together and a 30 foot plank strapped to your shoulders.

When landing an RV tail dragger it seems like your your feet are spread apart and your arms are tucked in. Much more stable.

Just my 2 cents.

Jim Sharkey
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-28-2010, 06:22 PM
bsacks05's Avatar
bsacks05 bsacks05 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 1,187
Default

I'm a 10 percenter



This picture was taken two days ago at my friend's airstrip. It was one of those "perfect setting" pictures - hot, late summer evening with the fading glow of a hazy sun, and a lone tail dragger ready for a turf field departure.
__________________
Bruce Sacks
RV-9 N659DB - Flying since 7/1/06
Hatz CB-1 - Fabric covering with Polyfiber.
Warner Robins, GA
A&P
APRS KJ4EFS

Last edited by bsacks05 : 08-28-2010 at 06:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-28-2010, 11:10 PM
Shockwave's Avatar
Shockwave Shockwave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ankeny, Iowa
Posts: 194
Default

I'm surprised the 7 / 7A percentages aren't closer, and I'm surprised there are more 8's than 7's. (of either type) I'm guessing the 9 has something to do with that.
__________________
Chanler Childs
RV-8A
Empennage complete
Building wings
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-29-2010, 04:08 AM
plehrke's Avatar
plehrke plehrke is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Defiance, MO
Posts: 1,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiz View Post
I assume the reason the numbers are a lower than those from the hobbs meter is that foreign registered aircraft are not included.

Raiz
I would also guess Van's Hobbs meter is low because some people that fly never tell Vans.
__________________
Philip
RV-6A - 14+ years, 900+ hours
Based at 1H0 (Creve Coeur)
Paid dues yearly since 2007
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:58 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.