|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

05-28-2010, 09:07 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 2,053
|
|
Fuel flow test
I did a fuel flow test today (removed fuel line from carb). I measured 26.6 gph. This is a stock set up (Van's fuel pump, gasocolator and lines as per the drawings.
Does anyone have numbers to compare?
__________________
Tony Phillips
N524AP, RV 9 (tail wheel)
|

05-29-2010, 06:56 AM
|
 |
Moderator/Tech Counselor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Troy, WI
Posts: 1,983
|
|
With the Van's electric pump I got about 42 GPH on my 7A. The pump is rated at 30 GPH at 4 psi, so at 0 psi (open fuel line) flow will be higher than rated. Standard Van's fuel system configuration except I used 3/8" flexible fuel lines from the sides of the fuselage to the fuel valve. I had short AL lines through the fuselage rubber grommet to the tanks. I used this test on every annual to ensure the pump was operating properly and there were no clogs or restrictions. Plane should be level when test is performed to elliminate the losses due to lifting the fuel.
I had heard of the fuel pump being plugged with metal shards from building processes and wanted to be sure I did not encounter that problem. I did experience these shards getting caught in the fuel tank drains and flushed several times before finally clearing them out. I had QB tanks.
Roberta
__________________
Roberta Hegy
Built/Flew an RV-7A
Air Troy Estates, East Troy, WI
Ford Expedition and TRICE "Q"
Built Glen L "ZIP" Classic Outboard Runabout and Super Spartan Hydroplane
Glen L Torpedo
Last edited by robertahegy : 05-29-2010 at 07:49 AM.
|

05-29-2010, 07:40 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Victoria, Canada
Posts: 2,247
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by apkp777
I did a fuel flow test today (removed fuel line from carb). I measured 26.6 gph. This is a stock set up (Van's fuel pump, gasocolator and lines as per the drawings.
Does anyone have numbers to compare?
|
I got 25.1/25.6 gph on my 9A, with the carb fuel line elevated 16" above the carb, representing a deck angle of 22.5 degrees (12.5 degrees best angle of climb + 10 degrees AOA).
http://www.vx-aviation.com/rv-9a/pho...126_2671_1.jpg
Vern
__________________
===========
V e r n. ====
=======
RV-9A complete
Harmon Rocket complete
S-21 wings complete
Victoria, BC (Summer)
Chandler, Az (Winter)
|

05-29-2010, 08:32 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cary, N.C.
Posts: 1,216
|
|
On my RV-6A...
...my configuration is: Tank---Selector Valve---Electric fuel pump---gascolator---fuel flow transducer---carburetor. Fuel flow was measured at the carb.
1. 3 gal fuel in each tank to minimize head pressure.
2. Three point attitude = 32.4 GPH
3. Tail resting on ground = 31.0 GPH
|

05-29-2010, 04:33 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 1,095
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noelf
...my configuration is: Tank---Selector Valve---Electric fuel pump---gascolator---fuel flow transducer---carburetor. Fuel flow was measured at the carb.
|
This was my fuel line routing exactly, but my airplane is a -7A. I just looked at my notes and I got 30 gph running the electric pump only.
__________________
Sonny W
Boise, Idaho
RV-7A Flying!
|

05-29-2010, 04:41 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 2,053
|
|
It sounds like my numbers are "in the ball park"! Engine ran great (first run) today.
__________________
Tony Phillips
N524AP, RV 9 (tail wheel)
|

10-25-2011, 11:16 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,642
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertahegy
Plane should be level when test is performed to elliminate the losses due to lifting the fuel.
|
Everything I've read suggests the plane should be in climb attitude (maybe even the best angle of climb) when the fuel flow test is being made. Is that the case? If so/if not, how high will I need to get the mains above the tailwheel to perform a useful test.
__________________
Steve M.
Ellensburg WA
RV-9 Flying, 0-320, Catto
Donation reminder: Jan. 2021
Last edited by alpinelakespilot2000 : 02-28-2012 at 03:05 PM.
|

02-28-2012, 03:09 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,642
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpinelakespilot2000
Everything I've read suggests the plane should be in climb attitude (maybe even the best angle of climb) when the fuel flow test is being made. Is that the case? If so/if not, how high will I need to get the mains above the tailwheel to perform a useful test.
|
Vern seems to have a rationale for why he chose to do what he did a few posts above, but does anyone know whether there is a "proper" attitude for the a/c during this test? I've looked in AC43.13 and in the FAA flight test circular but couldn't find any guidance on the appropriate attitude at which to do the flow test. Has anyone gotten an answer from Van's on this?
__________________
Steve M.
Ellensburg WA
RV-9 Flying, 0-320, Catto
Donation reminder: Jan. 2021
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 PM.
|