VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2010, 08:14 AM
Airhead Airhead is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oviedo, Florida
Posts: 73
Default Rudder Pedal Bearing Friction

I spent a good half day polishing the ends of the rudder pedal weldments with emery cloth to remove the coating and then realised they were still tight in the plastic bearings, so I kept going until I got a decent fit. Using emery cloth on the steel ends is very slow going (any other suggestions) and removing material from the inside of the bearing (again, with emery cloth) didn't seem to work well. Anyway, when I installed the assembly in the fuselage, I found that because the longeron on which the bearings are mounted have a slight camber, the bearings have a "toe in" position which causes an increased rotational friction in the rudder pedal shafts. I believe the hole was drilled at 90 degrees to the bearing, but that's not the way they end up aligning with the shafts when mounted.

How much friction is reasonable? For instance, if I pull the rudder pedals all the way to a horizontal position (with the brake cylinders & pedals on) they will stay in place. The rotational resistance is what I would term "firm". I would think that when they rudder cables are connected and you are effectively rotating both shafts by pushing on a pedal, this force will double. Did anybody else face this problem or decision?
__________________
Bob B
RV-7A QB slider - IO 360 M1B Hartzell C/S prop w/Dual 10" Dynon Skyviews - Classic Aero interior. Florida (SFB) based. 170 hrs TT .

Last edited by Airhead : 04-29-2010 at 12:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2010, 08:37 AM
Brantel's Avatar
Brantel Brantel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newport, TN
Posts: 7,496
Default

They are tight but will break in.

Mine were not drilled 90° I do not think. Seems I remember that they would work on one side not the other.

Here is a trick that I did on mine to loosen em up.....Works great!

http://www.vansairforce.com/communit...10&postcount=5

Entire thread:

http://www.vansairforce.com/communit...410#post304410
__________________
Brantel (Brian Chesteen),
Check out my RV-10 builder's BLOG
RV-10, #41942, N?????, Project Sold
---------------------------------------------------------------------
RV-7/TU, #72823, N159SB
Lyc. O-360 carbed, HARTZELL BA CS Prop, Dual P-MAGs, Dual Garmin G3X Touch
Track N159SB (KK4LIF)
Like EAA Chapter 1494 on Facebook

Last edited by Brantel : 04-29-2010 at 08:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2010, 10:13 AM
Airhead Airhead is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oviedo, Florida
Posts: 73
Default

Thanks Brantel for the reply and link to the other thread on the subject. I should clarify by saying that I am not so worried by the foot pressure required to push the pedal (they are not that tight) but was thinking more about the return to the neutral position in flight. It seems that after a rudder application the rudder should be able to easily return to the neutral position with the wind pressure on the rudder, rather than with a manual correction using opposite rudder. But I have no way of knowing what the wind pressure correctional force is until flight testing. At that point, removing the rudder assembly would be...lets just say a pain in the back. Maybe I should take them back out and try the "hot sockect" method loosen them up even more.

I noticed in the other thread with pics, it looked like some are putting the bearing blocks on with the rust preventative coating still in place (by tapping with a rubber hammer). I must say that mine would go on like that but would certainly have been unacceptably tight. As it is, I polished each end for 30 to 45 min. and obviously am still questioning the resistance.
__________________
Bob B
RV-7A QB slider - IO 360 M1B Hartzell C/S prop w/Dual 10" Dynon Skyviews - Classic Aero interior. Florida (SFB) based. 170 hrs TT .
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-29-2010, 10:26 AM
schristo@mac.com's Avatar
schristo@mac.com schristo@mac.com is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 988
Default air pressure from flight will set the return...

imagine the force from the air stream in flight... the rudder will find a trail position from the aerodynamic forces flowing across it that will far exceed the minor resistance from the wear blocks on the pedal pivots...
__________________
Stephen

RV7 powered by a lycoming thunderbolt IO-390
turning a whirlwind HRT prop

with more hours flying than building... 2,430 on the hobbs!
ORCA Flight
Race 771
margarita!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:58 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.