VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Avionics / Interiors / Fiberglass > GPS
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-06-2010, 11:19 AM
ryanturner's Avatar
ryanturner ryanturner is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Charlottesville
Posts: 20
Default Garmin GNS430 vs GNC420 vs GPS400

I am thinking of installing a Garmin GNC420 into my existing non-RV airplane as I continue to build my RV. Has anyone installed a GNC420 or GPS400 and latter regretted not going for the full blown GNS430? I already have a NAV/COM with glideslope, so it seems like a good way to save almost a thousand dollars.

Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-06-2010, 01:14 PM
pierre smith's Avatar
pierre smith pierre smith is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisville, Ga
Posts: 7,840
Default If you're not going to fly IFR...

...then yes. If you plan on much IFR, the 430W is a great radio.

Best,
__________________
Pierre Smith
RV-10, 510 TT
RV6A (Sojourner) 180 HP, Catto 3 Bl (502Hrs), gone...and already missed
Air Tractor AT 502B PT 6-15 Sold
Air Tractor 402 PT-6-20 Sold
EAA Flight Advisor/CFI/Tech Counselor
Louisville, Ga

It's never skill or craftsmanship that completes airplanes, it's the will to do so,
Patrick Kenny, EAA 275132


Dues gladly paid!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-06-2010, 04:41 PM
Alan Carroll's Avatar
Alan Carroll Alan Carroll is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 778
Default

I don't think there's actually anything special about the Nav part of the 430; works the same as any other. What is handy is being able to monitor an ILS using the GPS side of the radio. Not sure if you can do this with the 420?

If you're not planning to fly IFR then I'm not sure it makes much sense to spend the money on either radio.
__________________
Alan Carroll
RV-8 N12AC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-06-2010, 05:21 PM
SteinAir SteinAir is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,471
Default

Almost every single person we've sold a 420 to (usually agains my recommendation) ends up later wishing they'd have just got the 430W. There are a number of reasons, but the main one is that there just isn't much difference in price...and when it comes to resale you'll lose more than you save on the difference. The difference is literally only hundreds of $$'s on a $7K box....

My 2 cents as usual.

Cheers,
Stein
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-06-2010, 06:23 PM
jtrusso jtrusso is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 325
Default

I have a 400 and a 430W in two non-RV planes I fly. While the 400 is not WAAS, it is IFR capable. If you're debating between a 430W and a 400 I'd say go with the 430 so you can have vertical guidance on a GPS approach. If you're debating a 430 vs a 400 then I'd say they are the same if you already have two radios you're happy with. The only difference between the two is the radio as far as I can tell.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanturner View Post
I am thinking of installing a Garmin GNC420 into my existing non-RV airplane as I continue to build my RV. Has anyone installed a GNC420 or GPS400 and latter regretted not going for the full blown GNS430? I already have a NAV/COM with glideslope, so it seems like a good way to save almost a thousand dollars.

Ryan
__________________
-John
Flying a Glasair I FT
Planning to build an RV...someday
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-07-2010, 07:02 AM
ryanturner's Avatar
ryanturner ryanturner is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Charlottesville
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteinAir View Post
Almost every single person we've sold a 420 to (usually agains my recommendation) ends up later wishing they'd have just got the 430W.
Thanks. That is exactly the type of information I was looking for. Assuming I can figure out a way to pay for it, I am going to go with the 430W.

Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-07-2010, 09:41 AM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Smile That sort of...

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteinAir View Post
Almost every single person we've sold a 420 to (usually agains my recommendation) ends up later wishing they'd have just got the 430W. There are a number of reasons, but the main one is that there just isn't much difference in price...and when it comes to resale you'll lose more than you save on the difference. The difference is literally only hundreds of $$'s on a $7K box....

My 2 cents as usual.

Cheers,
Stein
...says that a 420W used would be a better value than a 430W used if you already have a nav/com....

Does the 430W have any internal "communication" from the GPS section to the VOR section?
...or are they essentially stand alone units?

I know that GPS info is communicated to the COM section...
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-07-2010, 10:22 AM
BlndRvtr BlndRvtr is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NE Where
Posts: 337
Default

If you looking to save some money, why not get a used 430 (non WAAS). Unless you fly a lot of hard IFR, do you really need WAAS? Sure it's nice to have vertical guidance on GPS approaches, but non-WAAS 430s are pretty cheap.

George
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-07-2010, 11:36 AM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Question Yes...

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlndRvtr View Post
If you looking to save some money, why not get a used 430 (non WAAS). Unless you fly a lot of hard IFR, do you really need WAAS? Sure it's nice to have vertical guidance on GPS approaches, but non-WAAS 430s are pretty cheap.

George
....I was wondering about that.
But if I start training for an IFR rating, all of the local pilots say that the 430W is the only way to go with modern technology.

I know you can do it on one Nav/Com/ILS, but does that make sense with current technology...
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-07-2010, 11:52 AM
ryanturner's Avatar
ryanturner ryanturner is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Charlottesville
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by az_gila View Post
I know you can do it on one Nav/Com/ILS, but does that make sense with current technology...
You can definitely do it all on one Nav/COM/GS. That is the setup that I currently have, but it can be difficult at times.

Ryan
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.