VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Electronic Ignition Systems
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-03-2010, 09:02 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apkp777 View Post
Bill - Is there any noticeable engine indication when the P-mag switches from self to ships power?

Are you using "test" switches? Your procedure above looks to be a fully functional test of the P-mags with no test switch.
Tony,

I have 113 Pmags which run off ship's power all the time, unless there is a problem, then they switch to internal power. That's why my preflight test is so complex.

To answer your first question, there is no indication from either the 113 or 114 as to where they get their power from.

The EICommander we make only tells you the CPU voltage, not where those volts are coming from. The Pmag doesn't put out that info. However, we can tell you if we can talk to each Pmag or not. That is not perfect but it is close.

Give me a call, if you have any questions.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-04-2010, 04:05 AM
Steve Sampson Steve Sampson is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire, England
Posts: 1,050
Default Keep the erganomics standard!

Tony, at the risk of confusing I have a different approach to wiring and testing the P-mags. I wanted the operation to be as conventional as possible. Take a look here. You end up with just two mag switches, see here, just above the intercom on the right. I dont like the airliner look or erganomics. If on the ground you need the master on and the p-mags 'off', just pull the fuse.

Bill, you said you test at 800rpm. I am doing this from memory but i seem to remember that mine did not quit until considerably slower than that. I'll check next time I fly,
__________________
Steve

G-IKON Build log here , or Index to blog here.
RV4 #4478 - Flying since 16th June '08. First flight video here.
Circuits at my 1000' strip.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-04-2010, 05:36 AM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Sampson View Post
...
Bill, you said you test at 800rpm. I am doing this from memory but i seem to remember that mine did not quit until considerably slower than that. I'll check next time I fly,
Steve,

No, I said (or meant) "around 800 rpm". They are all slightly different, each person will have to test their own installation to find when they drop out.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-21-2011, 11:13 AM
Bullseye's Avatar
Bullseye Bullseye is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 557
Default

Bill, I just wrote you an email offline, but I'm going to ask here, too, to see if I can get anyone else's opinion.

You describe a run-up procedure for the 114 Pmags that checks both ship's power and internal power, but includes some throttle jockeying.

Would the following work?

1) Prior to the run-up (still at IDLE less than your "around" 800 RPM), do a mag check (one side, then the other). You've tested the ship's power.
2) Throttle 1700RPM
3) Do another mag check (one side, then the other). You've now tested the internal power.

I think this accomplishes the same thing, with less power changes.

Does anyone see a problem with this?
__________________
Andrew Z.
Engineering Flight Test Pilot/Engineer, CFI-A, CFII, ATP
RV-7 in work (See my build log.)
Empennage...Done (except rebuilding the rudder.)
Wings...Halfway complete.
2018 Dues Paid

Last edited by Bullseye : 06-21-2011 at 11:14 AM. Reason: Grammar, spelling. Doh!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-21-2011, 11:54 AM
John Collier John Collier is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Niceville, FL
Posts: 81
Default OFF/ON/TEST

I used a type of DPDT...found the schematics somewhere in the forums. I've got one swith for each PMag...Off / On / Test (Momentary UP position). so my preflight is simply a push up to check the self generation...then if a need to turn a bad PMag off...down to OFF.

Let me know if you are interested in this switch set-up...I'll track down the schematic.

-BC
__________________
John Collier
RV8
N774BC
Niceville, FL
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-21-2011, 06:12 PM
Toobuilder's Avatar
Toobuilder Toobuilder is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N999ZA View Post

Would the following work?

1) Prior to the run-up (still at IDLE less than your "around" 800 RPM), do a mag check (one side, then the other). You've tested the ship's power.
2) Throttle 1700RPM
3) Do another mag check (one side, then the other). You've now tested the internal power.

I think this accomplishes the same thing, with less power changes.

Does anyone see a problem with this?

My understanding of the 114's is that you would not be able to verify "internal" power (even at 1700 RPM) unless you could absolutely remove the ships power (test switch, breaker, master, etc). Since you can't tell which souce is driving the ignition, you can only force the issue by running below the internal cutoff speed or removing external power.

I have dual 113's on mine and I use the standard key for ignition isolation, and the ships master switch as my "test" switch. Though I rarely test the internal power function any more, it takes only seconds to completely isolate and test each unit.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.

Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-21-2011, 07:10 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toobuilder View Post
My understanding of the 114's is that you would not be able to verify "internal" power (even at 1700 RPM) unless you could absolutely remove the ships power (test switch, breaker, master, etc). Since you can't tell which souce is driving the ignition, you can only force the issue by running below the internal cutoff speed or removing external power.
...
Very true. Even with the EICommander we can tell you the voltage on the P-mag's board but not where that voltage is coming from. That information is just not availble.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-21-2011, 07:29 PM
tadsargent's Avatar
tadsargent tadsargent is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 307
Default

Going out on a limb, would it be safe to say the P-mag would not put out 14v
When checking on the internal power with the commander
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-21-2011, 07:31 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tadsargent View Post
Going out on a limb, would it be safe to say the P-mag would not put out 14v
When checking on the internal power with the commander
No, the P-mags don't need 14 V to run. In fact, you can run them on a 9 volt battery for hand proping.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-21-2011, 09:43 PM
Bullseye's Avatar
Bullseye Bullseye is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 557
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toobuilder View Post
My understanding of the 114's is that you would not be able to verify "internal" power (even at 1700 RPM) unless you could absolutely remove the ships power (test switch, breaker, master, etc). Since you can't tell which souce is driving the ignition, you can only force the issue by running below the internal cutoff speed or removing external power.
Quote:
Originally Posted by N941WR View Post
Very true.
So it sounds like either the 113 or 114 needs either Bill's OFF/INTERNAL/SHIP or John's OFF / ON / TEST type switch setup.

I kind of like the all-the-way-up for normal operation switch position...

It's too bad I don't have more time to think about this...

Oh wait. I've got years to think about this...
__________________
Andrew Z.
Engineering Flight Test Pilot/Engineer, CFI-A, CFII, ATP
RV-7 in work (See my build log.)
Empennage...Done (except rebuilding the rudder.)
Wings...Halfway complete.
2018 Dues Paid
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:11 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.