VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-25-2010, 02:44 PM
boom3's Avatar
boom3 boom3 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sumner, WA
Posts: 722
Default Intake through Sump

Dumb question.

Why does the intake go through the sump?
Is it for room?
Is it to preheat the cold air a little?
__________________
Jeff Bloomquist
Sumner, WA
PP-ASEL, IR

RV-7A
Flying
1150 Hours
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-25-2010, 04:51 PM
WenEng WenEng is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 522
Default Carbureted vs Fuel Injected has different effects

Conventional wisdom is that heated intake air in a carbureted engine atomizes better prior to entering the cylinders. On a fuel injected engine, cooler air with a cold air induction system (intakes outside the sump rather than running through it) provide more oxygen thus more power. The ECI website states that for every 10 degree cooler the intake air is, there is a 1% increase in power. Somewhere within all that, there is more than likely the truth that carbs make better use of heated air to atomize fuel, and injected engines get more power with the cooler air.
__________________
Wendell VAF#1832
RV-6A 3/4 done...N48JE Reserved
Build site: www.mykitlog.com/weneng
Donated to VAF in 2020
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-25-2010, 05:30 PM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

The carburetor bolted directly to the heated sump is suppose to give it an advantage in regards to carb icing. That's why you'll see Lycoming manuals and Piper POH's calling for carb heat only when required, instead of the older Cessna POH's that call for carb heat on every landing. Many Cessna's used Continentals in which the carb/air isn't slightly pre-heated. This would technically give the Continental a slight edge in horsepower per cubic inch.

I'm a Piper descendant. My RV doesn't get carb heat on every landing.

L.Adamson --- RV6A
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-25-2010, 06:35 PM
aerhed aerhed is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Big Sandy, WY
Posts: 2,567
Default

This was originally called "Lycoming Hot Spot Induction" or something like that. It's purpose was better atomization despite loss from higher temp air.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-26-2010, 06:47 AM
pierre smith's Avatar
pierre smith pierre smith is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisville, Ga
Posts: 7,840
Default It also makes for a very compact package....

...but some folks opt for the cold air induction system.

Best,
__________________
Pierre Smith
RV-10, 510 TT
RV6A (Sojourner) 180 HP, Catto 3 Bl (502Hrs), gone...and already missed
Air Tractor AT 502B PT 6-15 Sold
Air Tractor 402 PT-6-20 Sold
EAA Flight Advisor/CFI/Tech Counselor
Louisville, Ga

It's never skill or craftsmanship that completes airplanes, it's the will to do so,
Patrick Kenny, EAA 275132


Dues gladly paid!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-26-2010, 09:17 AM
David-aviator David-aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 4,514
Default

If you ever had a C150 quit on a 90F day due to carb ice, you'd know the answer to the question. The darn thing just conked out one day at 9500' but on the glide down it started running again at 5000'. The next airplane had the 0235L2C. It never had a carb ice problem.

But all that being said, there are plenty of old Continental's still being used on Cub's and other very light airplanes and they do get the job done, one way or another. But that particular 150 was so quirky, some days carb heat had to be used on take off. That particular airplane, 6930G, was still flying the last time I checked. I sold it in favor of building the LEZ.

Fuel does seem to atomize better an warm air than cold with these small recips. There is a lengthy discussion elsewhere on this forum on that subject. More O2 molecules does not always mean more power. Temperature is a factor and Lycoming figured that out a long time ago when they decided to go with the intake through the sump.

(But that is not true with a turbine engine. For sure they like cold air, the colder the better. That's one reason a jet is so much more efficient at high altitudes, it's mighty cold up there every day.)
__________________
RV-12 Build Helper
RV-7A...Sold #70374
The RV-8...Sold #83261
I'm in, dues paid 2019 This place is worth it!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-26-2010, 09:51 AM
boom3's Avatar
boom3 boom3 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sumner, WA
Posts: 722
Default

Interesting, thanks for the replies!

The atomization thing definately makes sense on the carbed engines.

I guess the carb being bolted to the sump would make the carb just plain warmer as a whole. Ice can still form due to the venturi in the carb but the temperature spread is higher.
__________________
Jeff Bloomquist
Sumner, WA
PP-ASEL, IR

RV-7A
Flying
1150 Hours
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:00 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.