VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-04-2006, 09:56 AM
skelrad skelrad is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 146
Default Garmin 396 and MX20

For those of you who have the MX20, how do you like it? Was it worth the $$$? I know they are really two different animals, but in terms of utility, what do you think about the 396 when compared to the MX20?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-05-2006, 12:38 AM
osxuser's Avatar
osxuser osxuser is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
Default

I've used the MX20 extensively (300 hrs in our Cardinal) and a 296 briefly. The MX-20 is an amazing display. I love the symbology, especially tied into the SL30/GX60 we have along with it. It is truely integrated, and works beautifully. That said, I don't think it is worth the extra $3k unless you want:

Traffic display (pretty crowded on the 396 screen already, and avidynes new 600 series TCAS systems look tempting ).

Or if you plan on using ADS-B in the future (which I will be planning on).

We'll see when I get to that point in 3-5 years, but as of right now I'm planning on an airgizmos mount of a 396 instead of the MX20, but if I had more money, I'd spring for it. Of course, I'd rather have a GNS480/396 combo than a 430/MX20 combo.
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2006, 08:53 AM
N395V's Avatar
N395V N395V is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mendon South Carolina
Posts: 1,391
Default

I think the answer is .....it depends on what you are wanting to use it for.

I have used the MX20 CNX 480 combo with data link weather and traffic extensively in a Cessna 310 and 414. It is a marvelous combo for hard IFR and eliminates totally the need for reams of paper in the cockpit.

It does however consume a lot of real estate on the panel.

The 396 is truly a marvelous piece of equipment for navigation and weather.

My preference would be for the 396 and one of the tablet based chart/moving map systems as opposed to an MX 20.

Someone is selling a nice U750 and software at a great price in the classified section. I'd jump on it.
__________________



Milt Concannon
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-06-2006, 05:04 AM
Kahuna's Avatar
Kahuna Kahuna is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gold Hill, NC25
Posts: 2,399
Default

Looking at the cost of ownership, the MX20 is much higher for each feature added. Wx, chartview, traffic and db updates are very expensive.

You cant beat the size and clarity of the MX20 for terrain, airport features, and other important facets for IFR work. If you dont spend much time there you are waisting your money.

I much preferr My MX20 over the handheld. But I am paying for it severly.
Best,
__________________
Kahuna
6A, S8 ,
Gold Hill, NC25
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.