VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 03-15-2010, 09:23 AM
eric_marsh's Avatar
eric_marsh eric_marsh is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lockhart, TX
Posts: 206
Default Nosewheel vs. Tailwheel on rough terrain

The RV-6 kit that I purchased has the hardware for both a nose wheel and a tailwheel setup. I'm more inclined to want to go with the nose wheel because of increased visibility on taxiing take-off and landing as well as to avoid any insurance issues.

Safety is high on my list of priorities and in another thread I see that there have been a number of nose wheel related incidents. But here's the big question. If you take a look at this map of my field you can see that it's probably big enough for me to use as my own landing strip. It's a little rough, with some small (2') mesquite growing. I shred them periodically but they grow back.

So if I should decide to create my own landing strip is there a preference for nose or tail wheels on rough terrain?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-15-2010, 09:35 AM
Sid Lambert Sid Lambert is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Atlanta
Posts: 1,120
Default

Tailwheel is preferred for rough runways.

Insurance costs will be the same on RV-#A as RV-#. The first year may be higher but none thereafter.

Visibility in the -A is better but no RV is so blind it's dangerous.
__________________
Sid Lambert

RV-7 Sold
RV-4 - Flying - O-320 Fixed Pitch - Red over Yellow

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-15-2010, 10:28 AM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid Lambert View Post
\Visibility in the -A is better but no RV is so blind it's dangerous.
However, it's a fact, that with a tailwheel RV.............there may be objects in the path, that you may miss..............and clobber enough to do extensive damage. This has been proven by a "well known" forum member....

The Pitt's I used for aerobatic training did the same thing. Hit a small tractor used to tug aircraft, when it ran out of gas on the ramp. The Pitt's has less forward visibility than the RV, though.

It's really a tradeoff when making decisions. Tail wheel for rougher strips, or nosewheel for much better sight beyond the cowl, and some advantage in crosswinds.

My next plane will be a high wing tail dragger for "back country". Just a different mission altogether.

L.Adamson --- RV6A
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-15-2010, 10:55 AM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
Default

While there are nose wheel airplanes out there that work well on rough fields, I personally consider the RV nose wheel to be a bit delicate for routine operations from rough strips. Heck, i flew a Grumman with a similar design (but about twice as heavy) for many years, and was very cautious about rough field operations. If my intent was to routinely operate off of pasture land, I'd go tail wheel.

Yes, you can taxi into things if you don't see them, but S-turning is a fundamental skill with a tail dragger if you can't see what is out ahead. I find the visibility out of the -8 to be good enough that I rarely S-turn....in the -6, I sit lower, and do it much more often. Just like driving a car, you need to be aware of what you CAN'T see, and allow for it - situational awareness is key at all times.

Paul
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-15-2010, 11:00 AM
longranger's Avatar
longranger longranger is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 45G, Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,867
Default

It takes a lot less force to PULL a wheelbarrow over a bump than to PUSH it.
__________________
Miles (VAF# 1238, Paid up as of 2018)
RV-7 TU 904KM (reserved)
Wings Fitted and Finish Kit on site

Construction Log
Picasa: Empennage Album, Wings Album, Fuselage Album

1955 Cessna 170B flying since 1982

'To get something you never had, you have to do something you never did.' -Unk.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-15-2010, 11:13 AM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironflight View Post
While there are nose wheel airplanes out there that work well on rough fields, I personally consider the RV nose wheel to be a bit delicate for routine operations from rough strips.
I've determined, that the RV nosewheel is "very delicate", and that should be considered in all situations.

But since numerous friends have gotten into the "tundra tire" mode lately (non-RV)...............I'm starting to gravitate that way, in regards to rougher, and more rougher strips.

L.Adamson --- RV6A
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-15-2010, 11:17 AM
Jamie's Avatar
Jamie Jamie is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,295
Default

I'm a -7A builder/driver based at a paved airport but if I were based at a rough strip I would probably go with a tailwheel. However, if I were based at a nice sod strip I would have no reservations about the nosewheel. I have landed my -7A on sod many, many times -- no problems whatsoever.
__________________
"What kind of man would live where there is no daring? I don't believe in taking foolish chances but nothing can be accomplished without taking any chance at all." - Charles A. Lindbergh
Jamie | RV-7A First Flight: 7/27/2007 (Sold)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-15-2010, 12:07 PM
eric_marsh's Avatar
eric_marsh eric_marsh is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lockhart, TX
Posts: 206
Default

A tail wheel it is then. Cattle can leave some pretty good divots when it gets muddy. I think I'll have to rent a bulldozer one day.

Last edited by eric_marsh : 03-15-2010 at 12:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-15-2010, 12:37 PM
JonJay's Avatar
JonJay JonJay is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Battleground
Posts: 4,348
Default Upgrade your Tailwheel

Quote:
Originally Posted by eric_marsh View Post
A tail wheel it is then. Cattle can leave some pretty good divots when it gets muddy. I think I'll have to rent a bulldozer one day.
Upgrade to a Bell tail wheel or similar. It will give you a bit more clearance and the design allows you to slide over bumps that the Van's fork might catch.

Your wheel pants might take beating so plan on rebuilding the bottoms from time to time or consider leaving them off. Search the threads for larger tires as some have done this successfully and kept the pants.

RV's do a lot of things well. Rough fields are not one of them.
__________________
Smart People do Stupid things all the time. I know, I've seen me do'em.

RV6 - Builder/Flying
Bucker Jungmann
Fiat G.46 -(restoration in progress, if I have enough life left in me)
RV1 - Proud Pilot.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-15-2010, 01:08 PM
sandifer sandifer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 664
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L.Adamson View Post
The Pitt's I used for aerobatic training did the same thing. Hit a small tractor used to tug aircraft, when it ran out of gas on the ramp.
The Pitts didn't do it, the pilot did.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:28 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.