VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-09-2010, 11:25 AM
Michael Burbidge Michael Burbidge is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 652
Default What makes a rebuilt engine certifiable?

What makes an engine certifiable after a rebuild? If there are no logs on the most recent rebuild does that mean the engine cannot be put in a certified aircraft?

I've noticed in looking for a used engine that often there are no logs, or there are logs up to the most recent rebuild, and then there is no log information on the most recent rebuild. Buying such an engine is probably not a good idea. I've seen a few with 0 SMOH, but no logs on the overhaul.
__________________
Michael Burbidge
Sammamish, WA
RV-14A Empennage
RV-9A Flying?340 hours!
Last Donation: December 2019
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-09-2010, 12:34 PM
John Clark's Avatar
John Clark John Clark is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,324
Default Paperwork

The short answer to your question is paperwork, and lots of it. In the case of a "certified" aircraft, here is the guidance from the FAA. AC 43-9C. Google it and enjoy!

John Clark ATP, CFI
FAA FAAST Team Member
EAA Flight Advisor
RV8 N18U "Sunshine"
KSBA
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-09-2010, 01:15 PM
Michael Burbidge Michael Burbidge is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 652
Default Certified for my RV-9

I'm obviously looking for an engine for my RV-9. It seems like it would increase my chances of getting a reliable, known quantity engine if I restrict myself to one that could be placed in a certified aircraft. i.e. Know the history.
__________________
Michael Burbidge
Sammamish, WA
RV-14A Empennage
RV-9A Flying?340 hours!
Last Donation: December 2019
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-09-2010, 01:20 PM
SteinAir SteinAir is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,471
Default

John is exactly right, and in order to get the "lots of paperwork", you'd need to do a lot more. To be honest, if you truly want it "certified" and there is ZERO paperwork regarding the overhaul, then I know that we as FAA certificated people/shop wouldn't be able to do anything with it except tear it down and start from scratch. That means verifying EVERY part in that engine, inspecting it for airworthiness, and replacing a good deal of parts beacause you need to when teardown (rod bolts, etc...). Simply doing a cursory inspection would not legally suffice, although you may find someone of dubious character to "make it correct" on paper. This also isn't limited to the big parts of the engine, but things like plungers inside the tappets, valve spring retainers/washers, pushrods, etc...

Then, on top of the core engine, you need to literally do the same thing with each accessory that you have zero paperwork for - and in many cases it'd probably be cheaper to buy a new unit (like a mag for example) instead of tearing them down for inspection/verification.

In the end, unless it comes from a reputable shop or person I'd just stay away or consider it a core. That being said, your assumption that an engine needs to be 'certified' to increase your chances of finding an engine isn't necessarily correct. There are plenty of high quality shops/individuals that will do an overhaul on an experimental engine at a level equal to or often times better than a base level 'certified' version.

My 2 cents as usual!

Cheers,
Stein
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-2010, 02:24 PM
flion's Avatar
flion flion is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 2,647
Default

But Stein's pennies are worth more than most people's. The short answer is that an uncertified engine must be certified by someone who has the authority to do so, which will mean a rebuild so they can verify everything.
__________________
Patrick Kelley - Flagstaff, AZ
RV-6A N156PK - Flying too much to paint
RV-10 14MX(reserved) - Fuselage on gear
http://www.mykitlog.com/flion/
EAA Technical Counselor #5357
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:42 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.