|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

01-20-2010, 09:38 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,208
|
|
Dimple Dies - 1/16" Countersunk or 3/32nds NAS1097
I'm looking for dimple dies for either 1/16" countersunk rivets or 3/32" NAS1097 reduced head rivets.
Has anyone ever come across such a thing? If so where?
What I'm doing involves 0.020 aluminum, which is too thin to countersink, even for these rivets.
__________________
Kyle Boatright
Marietta, GA
2001 RV-6 N46KB
2019(?) RV-10
|

01-21-2010, 09:25 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 311
|
|
Is it possible to just adjust the 3/32 dimple die "shallow" ?
|

01-21-2010, 11:22 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
|
|
The head height...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle Boatright
I'm looking for dimple dies for either 1/16" countersunk rivets or 3/32" NAS1097 reduced head rivets.
Has anyone ever come across such a thing? If so where?
What I'm doing involves 0.020 aluminum, which is too thin to countersink, even for these rivets.
|
...of a NAS1097-3 rivet is 0.021 inches.
You should be able to countersink this if you are careful and perhaps use a clamped backing piece for the countersink pilot.
As a comparison, the head height for a 426 standard countersunk rivet is 0.036 inches and folks use these countersunk in 0.032 sheet.
http://www.hansonrivet.com/w06.htm
I would presume this isn't a structural part...
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
|

01-21-2010, 12:05 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 8I3
Posts: 3,562
|
|
No problem with .020 material and countersinking for 1097 rivets..they have a slight dome to them that helps them expand into the countersink. Wish standard rivets had this feature.
__________________
Please don't PM me! Email only!
Bob Japundza CFI A&PIA
N9187P PA-24-260B Comanche, flying
N678X F1 Rocket, under const.
N244BJ RV-6 "victim of SNF tornado" 1200+ hrs, rebuilding
N8155F C150 flying
N7925P PA-24-250 Comanche, restoring
Not a thing I own is stock.
|

01-21-2010, 05:03 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,208
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by az_gila
...of a NAS1097-3 rivet is 0.021 inches.
You should be able to countersink this if you are careful and perhaps use a clamped backing piece for the countersink pilot.
As a comparison, the head height for a 426 standard countersunk rivet is 0.036 inches and folks use these countersunk in 0.032 sheet.
http://www.hansonrivet.com/w06.htm
I would presume this isn't a structural part...
|
Your presumption is correct. I'll give countersinking a shot, but would still prefer to dimple this stuff.
So if anyone has a source for the dimple dies, lemme know...
__________________
Kyle Boatright
Marietta, GA
2001 RV-6 N46KB
2019(?) RV-10
|

01-21-2010, 05:11 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
Posts: 770
|
|
Kyle,
Out of curiosity, what are you doing?
And if you have room around and behind those rivet locations, which presumably you do if you can dimple there, then what's your motivation for using NAS1097 rivets rather than standard AN426 rivets?
Just curious.
-Roee
|

01-21-2010, 05:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,208
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by roee
Kyle,
Out of curiosity, what are you doing?
And if you have room around and behind those rivet locations, which presumably you do if you can dimple there, then what's your motivation for using NAS1097 rivets rather than standard AN426 rivets?
Just curious.
-Roee
|
The application is rib repairs on an Aeronca Champ. On a Champ, the fabric is attached by little bitty screws going into the ribs. If I recall correctly, the holes are drilled #44. The problem is that after 60 years or so and mulitple recoverings, the screws enlarge the holes. The common repair is to rivet little aluminum backing plates behind each wallowed out hole, then redrill to #44.
The original ribs are 0.020, and have a very narrow flange, so my goal is to remove as little material as possible when I drill holes to attach the backing plates. With that in mind, dimples are preferred to countersinks...
__________________
Kyle Boatright
Marietta, GA
2001 RV-6 N46KB
2019(?) RV-10
|

01-21-2010, 05:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
Posts: 770
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle Boatright
The application is rib repairs on an Aeronca Champ. On a Champ, the fabric is attached by little bitty screws going into the ribs. If I recall correctly, the holes are drilled #44. The problem is that after 60 years or so and mulitple recoverings, the screws enlarge the holes. The common repair is to rivet little aluminum backing plates behind each wallowed out hole, then redrill to #44.
The original ribs are 0.020, and have a very narrow flange, so my goal is to remove as little material as possible when I drill holes to attach the backing plates. With that in mind, dimples are preferred to countersinks...
|
I think you're correct that dimpling will leave the structure stronger than machine countersinking. But I'm still not picturing why you can't use standard AN426AD3 rivets. Whether you use NAS1097 or AD426 rivets, you're talking about using a 3/32" diameter rivet. Right? So the hole size (material removal) is the same, only the dimple size is different. And if the rib flange is at least wide enough to meet the edge distance requirement for a 3/32" diameter rivet, which it better be in either case, then it's also wide enough to accept a dimple for a standard rivet. Maybe I'm missing something..? Anyway, good luck!
-Roee
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:49 AM.
|