As long as the work was done correctly there shouldn't be any problem. That process would involve, swapping the engine mount, moving the main gear (In a -6 that might involve drilling new ones) moving the brake lines, figuring out a way to cover the holes that would be left in the bottom of the airplane and installing the tailwheel.
The worst part of the transition would be the tailwheel spring installation in the rear bulkheads. I'd take a good close look at that. There'd be new fairings involved too.
They may or may not have removed the old landing gear mounts. I wouldn't think that would matter one way or another except for the obvious weight disadvantages. If they did remove them make sure that the spar bolts were replaced with the correct ones.
It wouldn't be a fun transition, but there's nothing inherently wrong with it. The other way (6 => 6A) would probably be easier but morally questionable. :-)
BTW I built a -7 so I am making a few assumptions. I believe the geometry is pretty much the same in the -6 but someone correct me if I am wrong.
From Rosie: Their is also a difference in the tailcone section where the RV-6 is beefed up with, I believe, a double bulkhead placed back to back where the Horizontal attaches to the fuselage. I recall the attach bars in the RV-6 formed a 'V' and in the RV-6A they were parallel.
__________________
Phil Birkelbach
RV-7 727WB - Flying
Pitts S1C - Restoration
Christavia Mk1 - Fuselage
www.myrv7.com
Last edited by Rosie : 01-08-2010 at 11:37 PM.
|