VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-01-2010, 08:22 AM
aeropunk aeropunk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Unknown
Posts: 82
Default HS-405 to HS-702 Flange Edge Distance

It looks like this has come up before, but I guess I just need to be reassured since I'm new at this.

While drilling the inboard (non-prepunched) section of the HS-702 front spar flange to the HS-801PP skin, I came upon a problem with the last hole, which goes through the 801, then the 702, then the top of the HS-405 flange. As you can see from the photos below, there isn't sufficient minimum edge distance on the 405 flange.

Per the plans, I pushed the 702 tightly against the front flange of the 405, and even drew a centerline on the 702 to make sure those distances were acceptable. But since the position of that top hole is set by the 801PP skin and the pre-formed 405, I don't think there's any way NOT to end up with this.

It looks like RVG8tor contacted Van's about this very problem and they said it was okay, since the "HS-405 rib flange has been slightly short ever since the first kit RV-4." I'm tempted to call myself unless the consensus from you guys is, "build on."

Thanks!



__________________
"When the ships returned from a mission, everybody watched for them. They came lining back
to the field in flights of four, flying tight show formation with the black smoke fading in parallel
streams behind. They seemed to be most indestructible then. They were of frozen silver."

~ James Salter
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-01-2010, 08:54 AM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default Not a problem!

Build-on!...(Added words to make this stupid system work)
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-01-2010, 10:19 AM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default My standard practice is...

Whenever given the option between dimpling and machine countersinking, always dimple. Dimpling will almost always give a slightly stronger and more consistent joint.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-01-2010, 12:42 PM
mackd's Avatar
mackd mackd is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 61
Default

I'm not sure there's ever been an RV built without this problem... Don't worry about it!
__________________
David Mack
RV-7 Fuselage In Progress
Fort Collins, CO

http://davidandemily.org/~mackd/rv/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-01-2010, 01:22 PM
aeropunk aeropunk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Unknown
Posts: 82
Default

Thanks for the input, guys. I'm moving on ...
__________________
"When the ships returned from a mission, everybody watched for them. They came lining back
to the field in flights of four, flying tight show formation with the black smoke fading in parallel
streams behind. They seemed to be most indestructible then. They were of frozen silver."

~ James Salter
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-01-2010, 02:22 PM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mackd View Post
I'm not sure there's ever been an RV built without this problem...
Oh, there's been Lots of them. You seem to forget, when we built, we didn't get any holes. We put them where we wanted them.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-01-2010, 10:56 PM
DaAV8R DaAV8R is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lee's Summit, MO
Posts: 747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceanbird View Post
Hope you don?t mind if I steal this thread, sorry, but
I was never sure about what to do with that particular rivet,
and others that also go through 3 parts. What is the best way
to go?

a- Dimple all three parts.

b- Machine countersink the skin and leave the rest alone.

c- Machine countersink one of the underlying parts(rib?) and dimple
the others.

Thanks in advance for the advice.

oceanbird

I have been wondering about this also. I have been dimpling the top skin and countersinking the second ply and nothing in the third. Any comments from the more experienced builders?

Thanks
__________________
Robert Williams
Lee's Summit, MO
RV-8 - Empennage & Wings Done
Working on Fuse
O-360-A1A

1946 Cessna 120
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-15-2013, 03:20 AM
magiccarpet's Avatar
magiccarpet magiccarpet is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Switzerland, Europe
Posts: 199
Thumbs up Minimum edge distance on HS-405

Thank you for having posted your experience and comments on that issue,
I have just arrived there and figured, that my MED on the HS-405 (to HS-702) will be very minimum, if not sligthly too short.
I suppose I don't have to worry much about it and can start drilling
__________________
Chris, RV-12 S/N 120832, HB-YSC

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/magic.carpet.aviation
YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLw...nv3vJiqAYoE-dg

=VAF= dues paid for 2020
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-15-2013, 06:41 AM
WingsOnWheels WingsOnWheels is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 2,088
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaAV8R View Post
I have been wondering about this also. I have been dimpling the top skin and countersinking the second ply and nothing in the third. Any comments from the more experienced builders?

Thanks
In most cases, If the part is 0.040 or less, dimple it. Greater than 0.040 then countersink. If you have multiple layers, none greater than 0.040 then dimple them all unless the plans call out something different. If you have a stackup with multiple layers and one is too thick the dimple, countersink that thick layer and dimple eveything on top.
__________________
Colin P.
RV-6A #20603
Complete 5/10/19
PP SEL / A&P
I donate every year on my B-Day (in Dec), but donated early in Sep'19.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:49 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.