VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-29-2009, 07:51 PM
diamond diamond is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 710
Default Build time and difficulty comparisons

I've read quite a bit on the various models and so it seems the RV-12 boasts the quickest build time, as well as ease of build, etc. But what about a comparison between the 7,8, and 9 models? Is there any significant difference in the following categories between these 3 models?

1) build times (on the average)
2) difficulty and complexity of the build (as per plans without mods)
3) detail and ease of understanding of the plans that come with the kit

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-29-2009, 08:14 PM
FresnoR's Avatar
FresnoR FresnoR is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 479
Default about the same

I have only been able to research the preview plans of all three. They are pretty much the same except the 9 will have a bit more material due to the longer wingspan and the 8 has a more narrow fuselage, so it will be a bit tighter fit when squeezing in the fuselage area to do work.
__________________
Rick from Fresno
RV-7A


The art to flying lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2009, 04:58 AM
schristo@mac.com's Avatar
schristo@mac.com schristo@mac.com is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 988
Default fwf and finishing introduces significant variation

the sheet metal work between the three (7, 8, 9) is similar enough and each build shares a pretty common path so reported build times appear to be pretty consistent up to a point... there is significant difference from build to build within model and across models when you get towards the end of the riveting. the engine, panel, avionics, and instruments are only generally guided by the plans (accept for the 12 where everything is closely scripted). the farther afield you go with engine selection the more variation to build time and there are no two panels exactly alike...
__________________
Stephen

RV7 powered by a lycoming thunderbolt IO-390
turning a whirlwind HRT prop

with more hours flying than building... 2,430 on the hobbs!
ORCA Flight
Race 771
margarita!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2009, 08:07 AM
Jaypratt's Avatar
Jaypratt Jaypratt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hicks Airfield, Fort Worth,Texas
Posts: 1,727
Default times

The 12 does not compare to the 7,8,9. You get a different airplane at the end, totaly.

I prefer the 8, as a build, because I can build the canopy without any help. A 7/9 canopy would be tough to handle alone. The 8 rudder is a lot easer to build than the 7/9. The 9 ailerons and flaps have different trailing edges, more flustration there too. The center line seating is my preference too. Notice not the best,,, just my preference.
I do not like nose rollers as a build, because there are more intersection farings to do. Trigears are more work, in other parts as well.

Build an RV8, mags, Hartzell, 180 carb, and you will have a good performer in a short time.
__________________
Jay Pratt VAF #2
RV Central - Builder Assistance
Paul Revere, Borrowed Horse, & Shooter

Last edited by Jaypratt : 12-30-2009 at 10:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-30-2009, 08:08 AM
JonJay's Avatar
JonJay JonJay is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Battleground
Posts: 4,348
Default Don't let it dictate what you build.

There are significant differences in the end product. Make sure you build the airplane you want first. They are all a huge commitment in time and money so you want to be happy in the end.
__________________
Smart People do Stupid things all the time. I know, I've seen me do'em.

RV6 - Builder/Flying
Bucker Jungmann
Fiat G.46 -(restoration in progress, if I have enough life left in me)
RV1 - Proud Pilot.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-30-2009, 11:48 AM
dedgemon's Avatar
dedgemon dedgemon is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 359
Default More alike than not

I've built a '9 and a '8. An the '9 has a '7 fuse and the '8 has a '7 wing, so I guess I've built a '7 too sortof.

They're really almost completely alike as far as the build process. Minor variations at best.

Flying is another matter!
__________________
---

David Edgemon
RV-9A N42DE
RV-8 N48DE
whats next ??
Track me!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:47 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.