VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Electronic Ignition Systems
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-27-2009, 11:45 PM
Bevan Bevan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BC
Posts: 1,674
Default "no moving parts" myth busted?

While I consider it to be very robust, I wouldn't consider the LSI to have "no" moving parts. It has one very important moving "assembly" bolted to the crankshaft behind the spinner. This whirls around at crankshaft speed with all it's vibrations in very close proximity to the engine case and the "pick up" module. Is it significant? Well, if you put a second pickup in there for reliability and the first one failed mechanically, that event may also take out the second. If there were truly no moving parts, this could not happen. Probably very robust as is and I've never heard of a catastophic failure but still wouldn't want a newb to believe that there are "no" moving parts. Please corrct me if I'm wrong.

Bevan
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-28-2009, 09:00 AM
dedgemon's Avatar
dedgemon dedgemon is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 359
Default Magnets

True the magnets are moving. Of course everything is moving in some reference frame!

Actually my point was that I chose not to use the crank sensor to drive both LSI's because there is a small possibility that something (thrown alternator belt for example) could take out both systems. By using the crank sensor for one and the hall effect for the other, and two batteries, I feel like its about as robust as I can make it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bevan View Post
While I consider it to be very robust, I wouldn't consider the LSI to have "no" moving parts. It has one very important moving "assembly" bolted to the crankshaft behind the spinner. This whirls around at crankshaft speed with all it's vibrations in very close proximity to the engine case and the "pick up" module. Is it significant? Well, if you put a second pickup in there for reliability and the first one failed mechanically, that event may also take out the second. If there were truly no moving parts, this could not happen. Probably very robust as is and I've never heard of a catastophic failure but still wouldn't want a newb to believe that there are "no" moving parts. Please corrct me if I'm wrong.

Bevan
__________________
---

David Edgemon
RV-9A N42DE
RV-8 N48DE
whats next ??
Track me!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-28-2009, 09:49 AM
Snowflake's Avatar
Snowflake Snowflake is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,926
Default

Is there an EI solution that bolts on where the conventional mag goes, and uses the conventional mag's mechanism for driving the signal? ie. unbolt a mag, bolt on a block in it's place that does it electronically? Just wondering if there's something that doesn't need parts bolted on to the crankshaft up front. I'm a little concerned about failures up there too.

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-28-2009, 10:47 AM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowflake View Post
Is there an EI solution that bolts on where the conventional mag goes, and uses the conventional mag's mechanism for driving the signal? ie. unbolt a mag, bolt on a block in it's place that does it electronically? Just wondering if there's something that doesn't need parts bolted on to the crankshaft up front. I'm a little concerned about failures up there too.

Rob
Rob, yes there is, it is called the E & P-mags. Here's the link.

The E-mag is strictly electronic while the P-mag is the same unit but with a small generator built in so it is self powering should ship's power go away.

I'm running dual P-mags and think the world of them. In fact, I thought so highly of them that myself and a partner developed an in cockpit monitor/controller for them call the EICommander.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html

Last edited by N941WR : 12-28-2009 at 10:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-28-2009, 11:07 AM
Norman CYYJ Norman CYYJ is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Victoria B.C.
Posts: 1,265
Default

There are absolutely no parts bolted to the crank shaft for the LSI system. The sensors are bolted to the front of the crank-case. There are small magnets mounted in holes in the flywheel they are the only moving parts.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-28-2009, 05:55 PM
RV7ator RV7ator is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 1,007
Default Challenge Questions

Why would you want to put two different ignitions systems with the concommitant increased parts count (and maintenance time and cost for mags) on an engine? If you're squeemish about e-ignition reliability, why would you consider putting even one on in the first place? Is it that your desire for performance and fuel efficiency has you selling out your concerns about safety (as in eveyone has a price)?

The performance advantages of e- over mags is well known. I've substituted a mag for a P-mag at another's request and observed the performance deterioration. Mags bring nothing to the party.

I've run Lightspeeds and P-mags; I'd stick with P-mags. I've experienced mag failures. I won't use 'em again given the good e- options we now have.

John Siebold

Last edited by RV7ator : 12-28-2009 at 06:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-28-2009, 08:04 PM
Guy Prevost's Avatar
Guy Prevost Guy Prevost is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: albuquerque, nm
Posts: 1,167
Default

Just another data point. I've got one Slick mag and one Lightspeed II+ ignition. The lightspeed has been perfect and carries most of the load. The Slick mag has had two ADs already.
__________________
Guy Prevost
Albuquerque, NM
RV-8a Built, Enjoyed, Sold
Two Kids: Built, Enjoying
RV-10, Bought, Rebuilt, Enjoying
Build / First Flight Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f9HXzZT1dE
Build Log: http://websites.expercraft.com/geprevo/

Arguing on the internet is like having a competition to see who can hit a brick wall the hardest. You may win, but you're still an idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-28-2009, 09:42 PM
gasman gasman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sonoma County
Posts: 3,821
Default

One bendix and one LS hall effect. Great starts. 350 hours. No leaking seals, easy to time and has never been out of time. One moving part, the shaft that has the magnet that spins past the puck-up. This unit is soo easy to install......... a caveman could do it.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.