VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Avionics / Interiors / Fiberglass > Electrical Systems
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-24-2009, 02:42 PM
Jamie Aust's Avatar
Jamie Aust Jamie Aust is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 568
Default Please review my electrical system

Hello All,

I have been working on this for some time now, I would like to get feedback to see if this will be ok. I hope to NOT get any blue smoke !

What I used.
windows Paint
windows Picture fax viewer ( to rotate only )

My setup. Very basic day VFR.
0-360 fixed pitch carb ( no F/I or electric ig )
acs a-510 key ignition
60 amp ANL fuse and Dynon shunt on firewall.
No avionics master. My check list has them turned off before start/shutdown.

From other electrical systems I have seen , they all tend to use switches instead of a keyed ignition, so this is to help myself and others that might need a clear way to wire it up.

I have not put any devices in as yet, onto the main bus for two reasons.
1) I wanted a clean template. ( so others can used this template if suitable )
2) its easy to edit them in latter.

Item that will be going on the main buss are:
Efis - skyview 10"
Comm - Icom A200
Txpdr - Gtx327
Flap
Boost pump
Intercom - Spa400
lights - strobe/Nav.

The large ( Fat wires ) I have dont seem to be very flexible, has anyone used welding wire or 4x4 battery wire , both are very flexible.



That is the best I can do with the picture, my original file is a 5meg Bmp file, can anyone help with hosting that file size/format ?
__________________
Jamie lee
Brisbane, Australia
RV7A - Now Flying.
0-360,carb,catto 3 blade.
VH-XJL

Last edited by Jamie Aust : 12-24-2009 at 02:59 PM. Reason: pic problems
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-24-2009, 03:06 PM
AltonD's Avatar
AltonD AltonD is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dothan, Alabama
Posts: 1,487
Default

Looks efficient and will work. One suggestion, split out the avionics with an avionics master. The only reason is so they can be powered down convieniently for engine start. It is a personal preference and not required. But most that do not put in a avionics master, wish they had later.
__________________
Alton DeWeese
N526RV RV7A Tip Up, IO360 180 W/Hartzel BA prop.
Flying ~950 hours since Aug 2010
N4IDH

Construction Log
?The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one.?

?Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-27-2009, 06:02 PM
Bushcaddy Bushcaddy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 133
Default Fuselink needed

Hi Jamie,

I would increase the size of the wire running from the Battery Contactor to the Master Switch, to either an 18 or 20 AWG, then a fuseable link should be added at the Battery Contactor end of that wire, these are typically wires that are four sizes smaller than the wire they protect, therefore for an 18 awg wire you would need a 22 awg fuseable link and a 24 awg fusable link for a 20 awg wire. Otherwise that wire, as shown in your drawing, is running back through the firewall unprotected. Here's a guide:http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles.../fuselink.html
__________________
Don...
Plymouth, MA
Varga 2180; N2C

http://www.n2charlie.com
2013 Donation Made
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-2009, 07:56 PM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Smile I would leave it...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushcaddy View Post
Hi Jamie,

I would increase the size of the wire running from the Battery Contactor to the Master Switch, to either an 18 or 20 AWG, then a fuseable link should be added at the Battery Contactor end of that wire, these are typically wires that are four sizes smaller than the wire they protect, therefore for an 18 awg wire you would need a 22 awg fuseable link and a 24 awg fusable link for a 20 awg wire. Otherwise that wire, as shown in your drawing, is running back through the firewall unprotected. Here's a guide:http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles.../fuselink.html
...alone. The wire is not completely unprotected since it has the resistance of the contactor in series with the battery that would limit the current if a failure at the firewall occured.

Bob N's latest Z11 schematic shows the contactor wire as 22 gauge, and no fusible link...

http://www.aeroelectric.com/PPS/Adob..._Pdfs/Z11M.pdf

Bushcaddy's suggestions certainly won't do any harm, but are not really needed.

With regard to the previous avionics master switch suggestion -

Remember that this added switch can create a single point failure for all of your avionics, so if you do add it, at least use a double pole switch and wire both of the poles in parallel.
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-28-2009, 02:55 PM
Jamie Aust's Avatar
Jamie Aust Jamie Aust is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 568
Default

Thank you all for your reply.

I may fine tune it a bit more.
As you can see it is a Z11, but with key ignition.
So the two things for me to work out are,
1) Master to contactor wire size/ fuse-link.
2) Avionics master sw ( In the z11, I dont seem to see one here )

I would like anyone that has not put a Avoinics master switch in, to please reply.
__________________
Jamie lee
Brisbane, Australia
RV7A - Now Flying.
0-360,carb,catto 3 blade.
VH-XJL

Last edited by Jamie Aust : 12-29-2009 at 07:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-28-2009, 08:20 PM
Guy Prevost's Avatar
Guy Prevost Guy Prevost is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: albuquerque, nm
Posts: 1,167
Default

I did not put an avionics master in and don't regret the decision. Just build it like you want it. It will work great and be a joy to fly either way.

Guy
__________________
Guy Prevost
Albuquerque, NM
RV-8a Built, Enjoyed, Sold
Two Kids: Built, Enjoying
RV-10, Bought, Rebuilt, Enjoying
Build / First Flight Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f9HXzZT1dE
Build Log: http://websites.expercraft.com/geprevo/

Arguing on the internet is like having a competition to see who can hit a brick wall the hardest. You may win, but you're still an idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-29-2009, 04:10 PM
Jim P's Avatar
Jim P Jim P is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 934
Default

+ 1 on the no-avionics-master switch, and no regrets either. Would do it the same on the next project.
__________________
Jim Piavis
RV-7 (Flying!)
http://adap.com/rv7
Redmond, WA
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-29-2009, 04:27 PM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

It's a fact that some manufacturers prefer you to have your avionics off, when starting the engine, while some don't seem to care.

Personally, I prefer my avionics "off", and certainly don't care to turn them on or off individually. Although my avionics go through "one switch", the avionic buss is also my backup/essential buss.......which routes current around that single switch.

But what the heck, I also prefer the Cessna type batt/alt switch as opposed to other methods of individual switches. It has a built in interlock to always put the battery on line when ever the alternator is functioning.....automatically. Same goes for the regular "key start" switch too.

L.Adamson --- RV6A
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-29-2009, 05:23 PM
Guy Prevost's Avatar
Guy Prevost Guy Prevost is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: albuquerque, nm
Posts: 1,167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L.Adamson View Post
It's a fact that some manufacturers prefer you to have your avionics off, when starting the engine, while some don't seem to care.
Just to be clear, I do have my avionics off during startup. I turn the radio and transponder on after start, so I have two switches to press after start instead of one. It costs me about 1 second per engine start. Still, I don't believe there's any reason not to have an avionics master if you want one. Just a matter of personal choice.
__________________
Guy Prevost
Albuquerque, NM
RV-8a Built, Enjoyed, Sold
Two Kids: Built, Enjoying
RV-10, Bought, Rebuilt, Enjoying
Build / First Flight Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f9HXzZT1dE
Build Log: http://websites.expercraft.com/geprevo/

Arguing on the internet is like having a competition to see who can hit a brick wall the hardest. You may win, but you're still an idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-29-2009, 06:11 PM
TSwezey TSwezey is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,849
Default

We have a avionics master but my partner insists on turning everything off anyways. Could have lived without the avionics switch. We have to turn on 4 things. Two radios, GPS and transponder and it takes a whole 10 seconds maybe.
__________________
Todd
N110TD
RV-10 Vesta V8 LS2/BMA EFIS/One formerly flying at 3J1 Hobbs stopped at 150 hours
Savannah, GA and Ridgeland, SC
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:11 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.