VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-11-2009, 10:35 AM
Jeffsed Jeffsed is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: La Crescent
Posts: 11
Default Nose heavy

I have about 1hr tach time on my RV-9A O-320 C/S Hartzel. The 1st flight was uneventful... a little heavy left wing, but the part I really didn't like was during the flare I couldn't keep the nose off the ground at landing like a could in the transition aiplane I flew (O-320 fixed pitch). Second flight, 50 #s of ballast in the baggage area. Nose stayed off great on landing.

I am waiting for the ACK E-04 ELT and was going to mount in right behind the baggage area. Now I want to put it on the rear deck under the tail fairing.

My question: Will this help my flare without the 50 #s?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-11-2009, 11:18 AM
BillC BillC is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ramona, Ca
Posts: 259
Default

You can use your C of G data and calculate what weight would be required with the further aft arm (rear deck under the tail fairing) to equate to the 50# in the baggage compartment. What was your C of G during first flight? You might be looking at adding weight in baggage compartment as part of normal aircraft equipment. Spare parts and tools come to mind.
__________________
Bill RV-9A Flying
FFI- Flight Lead
N99WC
Ramona, CA (KRNM)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-11-2009, 11:23 AM
kentb's Avatar
kentb kentb is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canby, Oregon
Posts: 1,786
Default Jeff, it will help, but....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffsed View Post
I have about 1hr tach time on my RV-9A O-320 C/S Hartzel. The 1st flight was uneventful... a little heavy left wing, but the part I really didn't like was during the flare I couldn't keep the nose off the ground at landing like a could in the transition aiplane I flew (O-320 fixed pitch). Second flight, 50 #s of ballast in the baggage area. Nose stayed off great on landing.

I am waiting for the ACK E-04 ELT and was going to mount in right behind the baggage area. Now I want to put it on the rear deck under the tail fairing.

My question: Will this help my flare without the 50 #s?
I don't think that it will be equivalent to 50 #s. What was you weight measurements?

Mine were:
Nose Gear 283
Left Main 421
Right Main 420

I have no problem with weight and balance or flaring.

Kent
__________________
Kent Byerley
RV9A N94KJ - IO320, CS, tipup
AFS 3500, TT AP, FLYING....
Canby, Or
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-11-2009, 11:42 AM
newtech's Avatar
newtech newtech is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffsed View Post
Second flight, 50 #s of ballast in the baggage area. Nose stayed off great on landing.
Nose weight is like carbon offsets isn't it? I'll buy 25 pounds from you for my tail heavy RV-7A
__________________
______________________
Steve Eberhart, W9JUQ
3EV - Evansville, IN
Where is Steve and the Sky Terrier?
RV-7A Slider, O-360 A1A, Catto 3 blade, 2 screen Garmin G3X Classic, GTN 650, Bionics APRS. FLYING since June 24, 2009
EAA Chapter 21
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-11-2009, 11:55 AM
Av8torTom's Avatar
Av8torTom Av8torTom is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Yardley, PA
Posts: 1,334
Default W&B

In my Cherokee 150 I needed to keep 25 lbs of tools in the bagage compartment in order to be within CG when there were 2 adults in the front seats. It's not uncommon.

Where's your battery? could that be moved to behind the bagage compartment?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-11-2009, 12:30 PM
Leland's Avatar
Leland Leland is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Livermore, California
Posts: 146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kentb View Post
I don't think that it will be equivalent to 50 #s. What was you weight measurements?

Mine were:
Nose Gear 283
Left Main 421
Right Main 420

I have no problem with weight and balance or flaring.

Kent
My measurements for no fuel and an empty baggage compartment are:
Nose Gear 253
Mains 816

I have an O320 in a painted, upholstered and faired RV9A with a three-blade Catto prop. I can easily hold the nose off the runway until late in the roll-out. A friend with an RV6A and a constant speed prop had trouble holding his nose off on landing. He installed a Catto prop after bending the nosegear on landing.
Leland
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-11-2009, 12:37 PM
guccidude1 guccidude1 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Reno NV
Posts: 542
Default Re: Nose heavy

I also have a -9A, but with an O-360 and fixed Sensenich. I was nose heavy also, even with the ELT and tail strobe power pack under the vertical stab. I moved my battery off the fire wall and mounted it aft of the baggage compartment approximately 12 inches. Now I can hold my nose off until 40 kts gps speed, no wind, one SOB, and full tanks. Dan
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-11-2009, 12:44 PM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leland View Post
My measurements for no fuel and an empty baggage compartment are:
Nose Gear 253
Mains 816

I have an O320 in a painted, upholstered and faired RV9A with a three-blade Catto prop. I can easily hold the nose off the runway until late in the roll-out. A friend with an RV6A and a constant speed prop had trouble holding his nose off on landing. He installed a Catto prop after bending the nosegear on landing.
Leland
And I have an RV6A with a Lycoming 0360, Hartzell C/S prop, and the old heavy starter motor. My strobe and ELT package is located near the tail. Battery is aft of the firewall, as was done in the "old days".

For proper CG range, my plane requires at least a light weight pilot of some kind. But that shouldn't be a problem!

As to landing, I have two choices, which is much like a Piper Arrow. Land with power off, and a flare at the perfect time to maintain enough airspeed to keep the nose up; or simply add a bit of power thoughout the flare. I land both ways depending on mood. I'd certainly never resort to a fixed pitch to replace a C/S!.

L.Adamson --- RV6A
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-11-2009, 12:49 PM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

You could always add and oxygen system in addition to a tool kit... for extra ballast. I've flown a friends RV9A with a 0320/ Hartzell CS, and it hasn't been a problem. He has oxygen in the baggage area.

L.Adamson --- RV6A
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-11-2009, 12:50 PM
dedgemon's Avatar
dedgemon dedgemon is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 359
Default No ballast needed

Jeff,
The Hartzell equipped '9 is definitely more nose heavy than the fixed pitch ones; however, you can get the rotation and hold the nose up without all of the extra ballast.

First thing to do is check your trim tab rigging. You'll need it to move down(nose up) more than it moves up. A bunch more. I find that with full fuel and solo (worst case) I'll run out of nose up trim at about 65 knots or so. That works fine though and you can easily hold the nose as high as you like for the flair. You do need to trim it up though. Also, depending on your experience, you may be landing too fast. If you come down final at 70-75 knots you won't have it trimmed and it will be quite a bit harder to flair properly. Plus you'll chew up a bunch of runway.

After 5 years I find myself landing the airplane slower and getting much better results (unless its quite gusty). These days my "normal" final on a calm day is full flaps and 60-62 knots. This usually requires a "touch" of power to keep the sink in check. Kill the power in the flair, and you can pull the nose up nicely and get nice, easy, short landings.

I really think the key here is technique, not ballast.

Good Luck and enjoy the new plane



Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffsed View Post
I have about 1hr tach time on my RV-9A O-320 C/S Hartzel. The 1st flight was uneventful... a little heavy left wing, but the part I really didn't like was during the flare I couldn't keep the nose off the ground at landing like a could in the transition aiplane I flew (O-320 fixed pitch). Second flight, 50 #s of ballast in the baggage area. Nose stayed off great on landing.

I am waiting for the ACK E-04 ELT and was going to mount in right behind the baggage area. Now I want to put it on the rear deck under the tail fairing.

My question: Will this help my flare without the 50 #s?
__________________
---

David Edgemon
RV-9A N42DE
RV-8 N48DE
whats next ??
Track me!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:26 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.