VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Avionics / Interiors / Fiberglass > GPS
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-24-2009, 05:28 AM
Rick6a's Avatar
Rick6a Rick6a is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lake St. Louis, MO.
Posts: 2,346
Default 430 internal battery Question

Some 2 or 3 months ago, a casual conversation with the owner of an avionics shop revealed to me something I was completely unaware of. When he asked how long my 430 was installed, I replied with something like "over 5 years now." He said the internal battery in the 430 was due to fail any time now. What he described as its costly replacement procedure both surprised and angered me. We agreed Garmin could have easily made the battery field replaceable but instead chose a design that has the battery soldered to a board buried deep within the internals and requires the unit to be disassembled.

Sure enough, yesterday prior to a local flight the 430 warned "memory battery low."

My question is this: Since I don't really store waypoints or other data, with a dead internal battery, will the unit still allow me to point and fly my airplane towards the nearest or next destination that I happen to program into it on a moment's notice?
__________________
Rick Galati
RV6A N307R"Darla!"
RV-8 N308R "LuLu"
EAA Technical Counselor
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-24-2009, 06:44 AM
Capflyer's Avatar
Capflyer Capflyer is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,082
Default

Not completely sure on the 430 but last year in the 480 yahoo group there was a very long discussion on the internal battery. One of the guys was able to identify the difficult locally available to find battery but it was readily available from online specialty houses. Another guy took photos as his local avionics shop did the replacement and gave a full description on the proceedure. In all, it was a fairly easy task for someone that didn't even build their airplane. I would imagine that there were/are similar discussions on one of the 430 groups.

The flat rate Garmin charges on the 480 is $700 plus the shipping with insurance which is in excess of $100. That battery is one expensive little sucker if you need to send it back!

With the unit way out of warranty I'm surprised your local avionics shop would not change it for you if your not into doing it yourself.
__________________
Mike
JAMES AIRCRAFT.com

Flying - RV8 Hot Rod "Drone Killer"
Flying - RV8 "Look'n Good"
RV4 - FAST & FUN! Rebuilt, Flown, Sold
RV-7A Built, Flown, Sold
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-24-2009, 07:36 AM
BlndRvtr BlndRvtr is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NE Where
Posts: 337
Default

My question is this: Since I don't really store waypoints or other data, with a dead internal battery, will the unit still allow me to point and fly my airplane towards the nearest or next destination that I happen to program into it on a moment's notice?

Rick,

The answer to your question above is most likely, yes. The battery in most GPSes is there to keep the shut-down position known to the unit. So the consequence of a dead internal battery is longer initial satellite acqusition time. The 430/530 might also use the battery to keep user defined waypoints, but the data on the data card (which is most everything; airports, fixes, approaches, etc.) should be unaffected by a dead battery.

I'm sure our resident avionics guru Stein will have the definitive answer, but that is my semi-educated guess. Keep us posted on what you end up with, as I'm sure this issue will be coming up more often.

Fly safe and keep that sectional handy!

George
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-24-2009, 07:54 AM
n468ac's Avatar
n468ac n468ac is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: C09 - Morris
Posts: 579
Arrow

I can tell you based on our KMD150, you need the battery replaced. The battery on the KMD150 holds all the settings, the unit will default back to the original factory config. So if you have it connected to anything or have any other custom settings its a big pain in the XXX. It also took over 5 mins to find our position and the battery warning message seemed to come up every 20 mins to beep in your ear.
__________________
(This post by: Christopher Checca EAA Lifetime Member #799388)

Allen Checca (father)
Christopher Checca (son)

RV-6A - N468AC
ENGINE: Lycoming 180 HP O-360-A1A
PROPELLER: Senisentch 72FM859-1-85
WEIGHT: Empty Aircraft 1152 lbs
BASED: KC09 - Morris, IL.
Flying since June 6, 2005
N468AC Web Site
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-24-2009, 08:54 AM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
Default

Hi Rick,

I went through this about a year and a half ago on my 430, and as I recall, the answer was that eventually it would become such a pain that you'd have to get it changed. I think it failed to acquire a couple of times, actually - at least in a reasonable time. If this were an inexpensive portable, I'd put up with it, but with what we pay for a 430, I want the full capability - and if it is throwing messages, I'm not sue I'd trust it for what I intended it to be - an IFR navigator. All opinion, of course!

I did learn one thing about the "field replacement" idea from Garmin customer service, and it may not be applicable in your case (because of the unit's age). Garmin pointed out that the battery should last at least five -seven years, and if it doesn't, then you don't just have a battery problem, their experience was that you had a problem with the charging circuit for th battery. So folks that changed them in the field in a year actually had a different malfunction in the unit that needed to be fixed. Now this might just have been Garmin drumming up business, but I'll tell you, the list of things they did to my unit to bring it back to full certification standards (they won't let it leave the factory without full capability) was pretty impressive. There have been LOTS of mods to the package over the years, and they will roll them all in.

Just info for you to consider. I went from "Mem Bat Low" messages to long acquisition times in about a week BTW.

Paul
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-24-2009, 11:34 AM
Rick6a's Avatar
Rick6a Rick6a is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lake St. Louis, MO.
Posts: 2,346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironflight View Post
.......Now this might just have been Garmin drumming up business.....
Hi Paul,

I have to wonder about the veracity of Garmin's explanation simply because the same avionics guy told me that another GPS manufacturer's design (name escapes me) allows field replacement of the internal battery. In operational practice, I actually manipulate and refer to the handheld 496 far more often than I do the 430. I do like having the GPS 's displaying different pages. Oh well, I'll just have to see how much an inconvenience I am willing to put up with before I decide to pull the 430 for a round expensive (and unanticipated) periodic servicing.
__________________
Rick Galati
RV6A N307R"Darla!"
RV-8 N308R "LuLu"
EAA Technical Counselor
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-24-2009, 12:04 PM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick6a View Post
Hi Paul,

I have to wonder about the veracity of Garmin's explanation simply because the same avionics guy told me that another GPS manufacturer's design (name escapes me) allows field replacement of the internal battery. In operational practice, I actually manipulate and refer to the handheld 496 far more often than I do the 430. I do like having the GPS 's displaying different pages. Oh well, I'll just have to see how much an inconvenience I am willing to put up with before I decide to pull the 430 for a round expensive (and unanticipated) periodic servicing.
Definitely let us know what happens as the battery degrades - I admit I replaced mine because I maintain the box to FIR standards, so I didn't let it die all the way. I am not surprised that they didn't give a thought to a five-seven year life span...for "consumer electronics", that is an unheard of length of time for someone to keep a device. They just weren't thinking avionics, pilots, and the costs associated with replacement.

Or they just flat screwed up on the design...

Paul
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-24-2009, 02:45 PM
n468ac's Avatar
n468ac n468ac is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: C09 - Morris
Posts: 579
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironflight View Post
I maintain the box to FIR standards Paul

FIR?? some NASA standard?
__________________
(This post by: Christopher Checca EAA Lifetime Member #799388)

Allen Checca (father)
Christopher Checca (son)

RV-6A - N468AC
ENGINE: Lycoming 180 HP O-360-A1A
PROPELLER: Senisentch 72FM859-1-85
WEIGHT: Empty Aircraft 1152 lbs
BASED: KC09 - Morris, IL.
Flying since June 6, 2005
N468AC Web Site
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-24-2009, 02:53 PM
videobobk's Avatar
videobobk videobobk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Near Scipio, in Southern Indiana
Posts: 1,779
Default

Another concern might be the battery causing damage to a circuit board. That was a problem with certain computers way back when.

Bob Kelly
__________________
Bob Kelly, Scipio, Indiana
Tech Counselor
Founder, Eagle's Nest Projects
President, AviationNation, Inc
RV-9A N908BL, Flying
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-24-2009, 03:40 PM
ArizonaAero ArizonaAero is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 15
Default

The battery is not a huge deal to replace I have found myself doing a lot of them lately, the problem is possible damage to other EXPENSIVE components while attempting it. If your good with an iron and you take your time following the maintenance manual it's not impossible but it's touchy work.
Charlie
Mesquite Avionics
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:17 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.