VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-16-2009, 11:09 AM
Loman Loman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 179
Default Extra stringers to stiffen the aft bottom skin?

There have been a number of mentions here about belly skins oil canning and 'popping' in and out in flight (damned if I can find any of them now that I look).

I have been considering putting in some extra J-stringers in this area to prevent the problem. I'm thinking perhaps two J-stringers between the F-706 and F-707 bulkheads, evenly spaced either side of the belcrank rib and one on the centreline between the F-707 and the F-708 bulkhead. I have plenty of J-stringer stock left over from the wing kit to do this.

Firstly, I am interested in what people think of the concept in general. My worry is that I might be creating areas of rapid transition from supported skin to unsupported skin, which is a bad thing apparently because it localises stresses in that area.

Secondly, I am interested in opinions about the method of attachment. I see two options:

A) Cut into the bulkhead flanges to create new tabs, mimicing the existing tabs on the F-706 bulkhead that let the trimmed end of the J-stringers underneath. Then drill a new line of holes to rivet the skin to the new stringers, i.e. exactly like the standard side/top J-stringers are done. A slight problem here is that if I use the location of an existing bulkhead flange hole, it will no longer match exactly with the corresponding skin hole when the tab is made.

B) No attachment to the bukheads and simply pro-seal the stringers to the inside of the skin, stopping them just short of the bulkheads at the ends.

Forgive me if this has been discussed before but I did try to search and couldn't get a search string that pulled up any relevant information.
__________________
Loman O'Byrne
RV9 TU. O-320-E2D. Engine hung, working on FWF, Arklow, Ireland
=VAF= dues paid through Dec 2020
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2009, 11:57 AM
N8RV's Avatar
N8RV N8RV is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Elkhart, Indiana
Posts: 1,186
Default

Loman, I had the same concerns with my RV-8 during building. I thought about gluing some stiffeners or insulating material back there to prevent the noise of oilcanning.

After almost 50 hours of flying now, I can say that oilcanning just isn't an issue in my plane. More annoying is the reverberation of the noise the tailwheel makes as it taxis over cracks in the runway.

Just my two cents.
__________________
Don McNamara
Peoria, AZ

Builder: RV-8 "Smokey"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2009, 12:19 PM
Garage Guy's Avatar
Garage Guy Garage Guy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 457
Default previous thread

http://www.vansairforce.com/communit...ad.php?t=36763

--Paul
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.