VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-31-2009, 07:36 PM
jazzbazzfazz jazzbazzfazz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Default Tank leak question

I've discovered a leak in my right tank after assembly. It's at the seam between skin and outside rib, at the top side of the leading edge. In a nutshell, I can't reachit through the filler capwithout blindly tryingto dab or smear proseal where I'm guessing the leak is.

Anyway, as I see it I have (at least) 4 options:
1. Guess and dab through fuel filler opening and check. Repeat. Repeat. Etc.
2. Hole-saw a 3" access hole in the rear baffle, try to thoroughly clean out aluminum shavings, and go from there.
3. Remove the entire rear baffle, clean, re-proseal where needed and reattach
4. Slosh with PR-1005-L(maybe only at the leading edge/ouboard rib seam.

I'm sure each *can* work, but am interested which combination of ease-of-application/likelihood of success other builders prefer. I'm not sure that (1) will ever succeed (no guarantees). (3) is guaranteed to work, but involves drilling out hundreds of rivets. I've heard that sloshing (4) is better now...can I apply it only to the leaky area? And I'm not sure that a 3" hole inn the baffle will be easier to work through than the filler hole.
__________________
John Walter
College Station TX
RV-9A Wings
N629MW (reserved)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-01-2009, 06:31 AM
Randy Hooper Randy Hooper is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 227
Default Another option.

It sounds like the area will only have fuel when the tank is near full. If that is the case, there will be little pressure on the seam.
I think I would try putting a slight vacuum on the tank, then appling proseal thinned with MEK to the area. After the proseal is sucked in, release the vacuum and dab a little more sealer on the seam. Let it cure and check for leak.
__________________
Randy Hooper
RV-8
N84H
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-01-2009, 06:56 AM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default

Personally I would cut the 3" hole in the rear baffle and seal from there. It's easy to do and easy to make sure you have everything sealed. We had to do this on a lot of tanks that used the old unacceptable white slosh compound.
On the other hand, I don't see any problem using the PR-1005 slosh. I wouldn't do the whole tank. Just pour it into the area you are trying to seal. The PR-1005 remains flexible and seals quite well, but is also quite expensive.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2009, 07:25 AM
D-Dubya D-Dubya is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Beaumont, Texas
Posts: 156
Default Another option...

First off, I'm assuming you can't just put a fillet seal of Proseal on the outside where the rib meets the skin. This would be the easiest approach, even if you had to glob up a few inches to make sure you've got the affected area covered. But I'm assuming you evaluated and didn't opt for that approach.

I tried something else that worked for me when I had leaks on the rear baffle. Mine were on the 2nd and 3rd bays in, so they were a little harder to reach. Yours should be much easier to do, if you want to do it this way.

I got one of those bargain grease guns, just like you'd use on a car; get one where you can squeeze the handle with one hand. On the outlet, I attached a piece of copper tubing using a 1/4 tubing to 1/4" NPT fitting screwed into the end of the gun. The size doesn't matter, just make sure you get a new (clean) gun where the nozzle can unscrew, and get a fitting that fits it. Cut the tubing length so that you can operate the gun comfortably and the tubing will reach the leaking area.

I also got one of those little round mirrors from Sears that's on a telescoping rod. I also picked up one of those "bendy lights" (has a bulb on a flexible arm) while I was there, but you should be able to get any kind of small light inside the tank since your leak is on the end. One of those pocket LED lights dropped into the tank (on a string!) may make it easier. Walmart or Academy has them for a couple bucks.

The goal is to stabilize the tank on your workbench in a position where you can access the interior through the fill cap, then insert the light and mirror where you can see the leaking area. Make a test run with the grease gun to make sure you have the copper tubing bent into the proper shape so that it will reach the leaking area. Yes, all three things will be sticking into that hole, but it can be done. I think I ended up taping the bendy light down, leaving my hands free to work the gun and the mirror.

Once you have all of that ready, mix up some Proseal and load it up in the grease gun. You should then be able to glob enough on the seam by guiding the tip of the copper tubing and watching it in the mirror; it doesn't have to be pretty, just get it on there. If this sounds a little awkward, it is--to some extent. But it really wasn't that bad considering the alternatives I was faced with at the time. As I recall, I spent about $25 in tools (the grease gun gets tossed afterwards), and it took a few hours to do.

But the benefit is that you don't have to cut a new hole in the rear baffle (Van's recommendation), or remove the rear baffle altogether. Either of those could create more leaks than you already had. Van's also recommended against the sloshing compound, as they said some builders had reported this stuff sloughing off later on. There may be newer & better compounds out there now, but that's what they told me a few years back.

You may try the easiest approaches first, then give this a shot if those don't work.
__________________
David Welsh
Beaumont, TX
RV-7 N413WD
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-01-2009, 07:25 AM
rv9aviator rv9aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,505
Default

Need a little education here. Is the PR-1005 slosh different from the old slosh that would peel and come loose causing all sorts of problems? How do you prep for using this product after you have already had fuel in the tank. Thanks
__________________
Jim Wright
RV-9A N9JW 90919 SoldArkansas
http://www.jimsairplanes.com
_______________________
"It's a brutal struggle for the biscuit."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-01-2009, 08:23 AM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default YES!

Quote:
Originally Posted by rv9aviator View Post
Need a little education here. Is the PR-1005 slosh different from the old slosh that would peel and come loose causing all sorts of problems? How do you prep for using this product after you have already had fuel in the tank. Thanks
PR-1005 is a red compound that drys to a "rubbery" state that remains flexible. The old slosh we used originally was white and dried to a somewhat "non-flexible" state.
I used the PR-1005 as a final seal in my bi-plane tanks. It works great but is quite expensive. A quart is almost $100.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-01-2009, 08:28 AM
Kyle Boatright Kyle Boatright is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel View Post
PR-1005 is a red compound that drys to a "rubbery" state that remains flexible. The old slosh we used originally was white and dried to a somewhat "non-flexible" state.
I used the PR-1005 as a final seal in my bi-plane tanks. It works great but is quite expensive. A quart is almost $100.
Thread drift alert!!!

What biplane?
__________________
Kyle Boatright
Marietta, GA
2001 RV-6 N46KB
2019(?) RV-10
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-01-2009, 12:55 PM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle Boatright View Post
Thread drift alert!!!
What biplane?
No thread drift here. The original question asked about using PR-1005 slosh. I simply stated that I trust it enough to use it in my bi-plane tanks. I've been scratch building a bi-plane in the back ground for several years now.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-01-2009, 01:04 PM
DanH's Avatar
DanH DanH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel View Post
No thread drift here. The original question asked about using PR-1005 slosh. I simply stated that I trust it enough to use it in my bi-plane tanks. I've been scratch building a bi-plane in the back ground for several years now.
Scratch a serious builder and you'll always find a biplane guy in there somewhere
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-01-2009, 01:44 PM
Kyle Boatright Kyle Boatright is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel View Post
No thread drift here. The original question asked about using PR-1005 slosh. I simply stated that I trust it enough to use it in my bi-plane tanks. I've been scratch building a bi-plane in the back ground for several years now.
I was the one drifting the thread in order to find out what biplane you're building...
__________________
Kyle Boatright
Marietta, GA
2001 RV-6 N46KB
2019(?) RV-10
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.