|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

09-14-2009, 12:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 58
|
|
FAA Designator and Equipment Code
I see from earlier posts that Controllers recognize the type "RV9", and its been my experience that they are familiar. We were up in Canada this last week and when I went to file my flight plan with CAN FSS they asked for the "equipment code".
I checked a few online resources, and since I have Mode C, a Garmin 496 and no IFR equipment is it correct to describe my plane as an "RV9/U" ?
I see some posts refer to "RV9/G", but since the 496 is not adequate for IFR flight then the "G" seems incorrect in my case.
Regards,
Gerry.
|

09-14-2009, 01:15 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 3,152
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistergerf
I see from earlier posts that Controllers recognize the type "RV9", and its been my experience that they are familiar. We were up in Canada this last week and when I went to file my flight plan with CAN FSS they asked for the "equipment code".
I checked a few online resources, and since I have Mode C, a Garmin 496 and no IFR equipment is it correct to describe my plane as an "RV9/U" ?
I see some posts refer to "RV9/G", but since the 496 is not adequate for IFR flight then the "G" seems incorrect in my case.
Regards,
Gerry.
|
You are correct. /G would not be appropriate in your case.
__________________
Scott Card
CQ Headset by Card Machine Works
CMW E-Lift
RV-9A N4822C flying 2200+hrs. / Cedar Park, TX
RV8 Building - fuselage / showplanes canopy (Done!)
|

09-15-2009, 07:52 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,231
|
|
Yep - 496 is legal for VFR navigation, but not for an IFR flight plan (the only reason for using the codes).
|

09-15-2009, 11:40 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sisters, OR
Posts: 179
|
|
Flight Following
I use VFR Flight Following quite often and on a few occasions I have been asked for my equipment code when initiating the request. I do not know if it is only required on IFR flight, as an earlier poster wrote, but it is no big deal to respond with an "RV6/U".
__________________
Mike Macon
RV6A
Carbon Cub EX
VAF #201
Last edited by Mike Macon : 09-15-2009 at 05:23 PM.
|

09-15-2009, 07:02 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,357
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scard
You are correct. /G would not be appropriate in your case.
|
Actually, when filing a flight plan in Canada, one uses the Canadian equipment codes, which differ from the US ones. Canada has adopted the equipment codes specified by ICAO, but the FAA hasn't done that yet.
Note 5 to the table of Canadian equipment codes says
Quote:
When using the letter ?G? on an IFR flight plan, the GPS receiver must be approved in accordance with the requirements specified in TSO C-129 (Class A1, A2, B1, B2, C1 or C2), installed and approved in accordance with the appropriate sections of the Airworthiness Manual, and operated in accordance with the approved flight manual or flight manual supplement. Pilots are encouraged to use the letter ?G? on VFR flight plans when using GPS to assist VFR navigation. TSO C-129 receivers are not mandatory for
VFR flights.
|
So, for a VFR flight plan in Canada, you can use "G" if you have a handheld GPS. But note that is not a "/G". Up here the equipment codes go before the "/". The transponder code goes after the "/". GPS, VHF Com and mode C would get an equipment code of GV/C.
|

09-16-2009, 09:27 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 58
|
|
Thanks all !
Thanks !
So in the US its "slash uniform" and in Canada its "golf victor slash charlie"
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:34 AM.
|