VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-11-2009, 08:38 PM
N62XS N62XS is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hazlehurst, GA
Posts: 1,359
Default MGL Autopilot?

Is anyone using the Enigma autopilot feature with Trio Servos? Actual user opinions sought.
__________________

IHN,

2020 Dues Paid

Robby Knox

THEM: Why do you always carry a knife?

ME: I can't open a bag of chips with my Glock!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2010, 10:35 AM
Darren S Darren S is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 439
Default

Good luck on this one. I've been digging for the same info. Check out the Stratomaster forum.

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2010, 11:04 AM
Bavafa Bavafa is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,344
Default

My info is about 18 months old when I was going thru evaluating which system go with. The info I had got from a few sources was that MGL A/P performance even with Trio was poor at best. Trio was their primary A/P that they had partner with. I am sure they have improved the operation since or at least one would think so.
__________________
Mehrdad
N825SM RV7A - IO360M1B - SOLD
N825MS RV14A - IO390 - Flying
Dues paid
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-08-2010, 09:06 AM
N131RV N131RV is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Elmendorf,TX
Posts: 358
Default MGL Autopilot status

I have an Odyssey connected to a trio servo for vertical autopilot. I have a separate a/p for horizontal navigation.

I've been test flying the vertical MGL autopilot code for almost a year now. It has gone through many revisions.

At this point it's "usable" for my purposes. I am waiting for another revision from Rainier to further address the issues.

My experience:
  1. It will hold altitude fairly well. I have a fairly fast aircraft with slight rearward CG (not out of limits). In calm air it holds usually to +/- 20 feet with only a few "excursions" beyond that. In turbulence, it usually works pretty well, responding to bumps and disturbances fairly quickly.
  2. Descents are managed pretty well. Using the "bug" to descend will result in a pretty smooth descent with only a couple of "hunts" initially.
  3. Climbs are a real dipsy doodle affair. The aircraft will bob and dip incessantly.
  4. The vertical "nav" from the MGL works poorly on approach.
  5. It's not easy to configure. I have spent numerous hours "tuning" the parameters with sometimes only minimal effect.

Bear in mind, I fly this code almost every day, but it's not what I call "finished" just yet.

Rainier and I sometimes disagree on the causes of this. He is a brilliant guy, but does not have a fast RV7 to test fly (last I heard).

I think it will get there. I don't think is quite "there" yet for a fast, responsive RV like mine.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------
Hangared since 11/23/2011, working on getting airborne again!
Joe Portman
N131RV - RV-7A, IO360A1B6, CS
Rebuilt as TD
Added dual MGL EFIS.
Airborne again at last! 2/21/2009

Elmendorf, TX (28TE)

baron (AT) baron (dot) com
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:35 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.