|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

09-01-2009, 09:35 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 1,262
|
|
194 hour boroscope and compressions
Under warrantee, I sent my MT prop back to a factory service center since it was “burping” grease from around the blade seals. Not really bad but enough to put a mist on the windscreen.
While it was off and since my condition inspection is coming due next month, I decided to clean and rotate the plugs, get the engine (IO360 8.5:1) boroscoped, and check the compression.
I have been running both ROP and LOP depending on the altitude. I won’t run LOP unless I’m at least 9,000 feet or more. I also use 2,200 rpm for my cruise speed. Typical TAS ROP (9.5 gal/hr) at 9,500 feet is 163 knots and LOP (7.2 gal/hr) is 158 knots.
At 194 hours, scope was normal wear and everything looked good. Mechanic was impressed at how clean the engine compartment was.
When I stopped by and saw the mechanics note, the compressions listed were 73/73/72/71. At first I thought they were low, but noticed something about an orifice in earlier post (size matters) and if memory is correct, it was 0.049 (something Gil was talking about). I was pleased that they were so close together.
Not having any previous compressions to compare it against since this is the first condition inspection, I’m wondering if the compressions are good, average, or poor?
__________________
Webb Willmott
Jackson, MS
N32WW
Last edited by Webb : 09-02-2009 at 05:14 AM.
|

09-02-2009, 06:26 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Africa, Johannesburg
Posts: 1,313
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Webb
<SNIP>
At 194 hours, scope was normal wear and everything looked good. Mechanic was impressed at how clean the engine compartment was.
When I stopped by and saw the mechanics note, the compressions listed were 73/73/72/71. At first I thought they were low, but noticed something about an orifice in earlier post (size matters) and if memory is correct, it was 0.049 (something Gil was talking about). I was pleased that they were so close together.
Not having any previous compressions to compare it against since this is the first condition inspection, I?m wondering if the compressions are good, average, or poor?
|
I'll take a stab at it and add my 2cents.
The Borroscope will give you much more info than the blow bys.
The blow bys are just an early/easy indicator that something is amiss.
Your blow bys so close together mean you have good even 'wear'.
Not all of us has boroscope kit, since it is a bit expensive.
What is important now is to take it back to the same person next time, he uses the exact same method, and exact same equipment, for you to get a trend. Jumping around using different people, different methods and different equipment will just confuse you and your readings.
For comparison for what ever it is worth. I bought the Aircraft Spruce Blow By Tester, WITHOUT the ORRIFICE adjuster. I will use the same one throughout my airplanes life.
My first blow by test after 1 year of operation of a brand new Factory standard XP-IO-360 on 170H hobbs / 140H Tacho time (Dynon normalises Tacho time to 2500RPM, hence it is less than 170H). My airplane/airfield is situated at 5500 ASL so most of my flying is 7,000 ft+, most of the time LOP and on Mogas.
I went flying to heat the motor, then back to hangar to take the blow by readings asap: 79,78,76,78 over 80 PSI.
My my #1 always coldest and #3 always ran hottest so it kinda makes sense 79 vs 76. My #2 and #4 run about equal temps and both are 78.
The TRICK is that I have a 1 year reference point now. I made some baffle adjustments to raise #1 temps and lower #3 temps.
Next year I will use the same kit and method and compare to this years figures, if they jump out significantly, then first thing to do is go fly and gun the engine hard for 2 hours and repeat the test. If it is still out, then it is time to visit someone with a boroscope to check.
I hope that helps.
Rudi
__________________
Rudi Greyling, South Africa, RV 'ZULU 7' Flying & RV 'ZULU 10' Flying
"Science, freedom, beauty, adventure...what more could you ask of life? Aviation offers it all" - Charles A. Lindbergh
Last edited by RudiGreyling : 09-02-2009 at 06:39 AM.
|

09-02-2009, 01:12 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bozeman, Montana
Posts: 858
|
|
Numbers at 96 hours
I tested mine at 96 hours borrowed equipment and they were 78,79,79,80. I was mainly checking the engine for problems after the pmag timing failure.
Hans
|

09-03-2009, 05:55 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
|
|
This is the post....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Webb
...
When I stopped by and saw the mechanics note, the compressions listed were 73/73/72/71. At first I thought they were low, but noticed something about an orifice in earlier post (size matters) and if memory is correct, it was 0.049 (something Gil was talking about). I was pleased that they were so close together.
....
|
...you remembered....
http://www.vansairforce.com/communit...40+compression
It is a 0.040 orifice for our Lycomings per their Service Instruction
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
|

09-03-2009, 07:34 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 1,262
|
|
Hey Gil.....I called Eagle Engines and talked to Lou about the numbers. He was very please with the closeness. He told me to keep doing what I've been doing.
__________________
Webb Willmott
Jackson, MS
N32WW
|

09-03-2009, 08:15 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Montague, Ca
Posts: 124
|
|
Test new engine?
I really like the idea of using the same method and equipment every time.
Does someone have a recommendation for a reasonably priced tester ?
Also, would it make sense to test a new engine prior to it's first operation as a baseline reference point? Mine will be ready to run early 2010. (XIO360 - stock from Van's)
Thanks
Steve (RV-8 fastback builder and former Supercub owner)
|

09-03-2009, 11:16 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
|
|
The E2A model...
...is the one with the Lycoming recommended 0.040 orifice --
http://www.chiefaircraft.com/airsec/...ionTester.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by axlr8r
I really like the idea of using the same method and equipment every time.
Does someone have a recommendation for a reasonably priced tester ?
Also, would it make sense to test a new engine prior to it's first operation as a baseline reference point? Mine will be ready to run early 2010. (XIO360 - stock from Van's)
Thanks
Steve (RV-8 fastback builder and former Supercub owner)
|
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
|

09-04-2009, 12:49 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Africa, Johannesburg
Posts: 1,313
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by axlr8r
I really like the idea of using the same method and equipment every time.
Does someone have a recommendation for a reasonably priced tester ?
Also, would it make sense to test a new engine prior to it's first operation as a baseline reference point? Mine will be ready to run early 2010. (XIO360 - stock from Van's)
Thanks
Steve (RV-8 fastback builder and former Supercub owner)
|
Ditto, get the 0.4 orifice one from Chief or Spruce
I bought the standard EA2 one
http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalo...resstester.php
Standard Tester 12-01012 $69.75
If I did it again, I would rather buy the one with E2-M Master orifice adjuster Tester for $90+, gives you more options if needed.
Regards
Rudi
__________________
Rudi Greyling, South Africa, RV 'ZULU 7' Flying & RV 'ZULU 10' Flying
"Science, freedom, beauty, adventure...what more could you ask of life? Aviation offers it all" - Charles A. Lindbergh
|

09-04-2009, 06:37 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 1,262
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RudiGreyling
Ditto, get the 0.4 orifice one from Chief or Spruce
Regards
Rudi
|
I think you meant the 0.04............the other is a fairly large hole.
__________________
Webb Willmott
Jackson, MS
N32WW
|

09-04-2009, 07:12 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Montague, Ca
Posts: 124
|
|
Thanks for
The very helpful information
Steve
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:46 PM.
|