|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

08-06-2009, 10:17 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alviso, CA
Posts: 405
|
|
New prop legality question for DARs or others who know
Guys,
I've got a new Catto prop on order which I should get this month. Its very similar to what I'm flying now except less pitch and slightly longer.
Anyway, do I need to contact the FSDO or fly off any hours on the new prop, or do anything else besides just put it on and fly?
__________________
Steve Brown
N598SD - RV9A second owner
O-320, 9:1 pistons, Catto 3 blade
KRHV - Reid Hillview airport, San Jose, CA
|

08-06-2009, 11:04 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
|
|
Steve,
I exchanged emails with my local FISDO with the exact same question. It was my plan to stay with a Catto, just a different diameter and pitch.
The Charlotte, NC FISDO (your's may be different) said I had to notify them of the change and go back into Phase I for five hours of testing.
The answer lies with the paperwork for your airplane and your local FISDO.
The funny thing is that now that it looks like I might change both the engine and prop, I will probably still have just a five hour test period. Go figure.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
|

08-06-2009, 11:07 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sonoma County
Posts: 3,821
|
|
Yes, if the change is not the same prop,then you must do what your limitations say under major changes..............
|

08-06-2009, 03:10 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Locust Grove, GA
Posts: 2,624
|
|
The above answers are correct. Read your limitations. If they are recent (past 3-5 years) they will explicitly state that you must contact your local FSDO after any major change. Think of a major change as one which has the potential to change the flight characteristics of the airplane. A differently-pitched prop clearly fits into that category. You also want your insuarance to be valid. Non compliance with your limitations may invalidate your insurance.
Vic
__________________
 Vic Syracuse
Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, Just Superstol, DAR, A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES
Kitplanes "Unairworthy" monthly feature
EAA Sport Aviation "Checkpoints" column
EAA Homebuilt Council Chair/member EAA BOD
Author "Pre-Buy Guide for Amateur-Built Aircraft"
www.Baselegaviation.com
|

08-06-2009, 03:21 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
|
|
FYI - The following just hit my inbox from my local FSDO.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Charlotte FISDO
Good Afternoon Bill;
You will need to complete an FAA Form 8130-6 to reflect the new Make/Model of the Engine/Propeller and submit a program letter describing the test flight area requested, the requested flight test hours and a description of the alteration.
Any questions, feel free to give a call!
|
Yes, our FSDO is filled with good, professional, and helpful people.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
|

08-12-2009, 04:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alviso, CA
Posts: 405
|
|
Thanks!
Guys,
Thanks for the feedback. As advised I checked my operating limitations and they say I need to contact the FSDO.
Hopefully they let me fly it out of my airport - RHV.
__________________
Steve Brown
N598SD - RV9A second owner
O-320, 9:1 pistons, Catto 3 blade
KRHV - Reid Hillview airport, San Jose, CA
|

08-12-2009, 08:12 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 878
|
|
Every FSDO is different...
I switched from a ground adjustable Sensenich, to an IVO Magnum in-flight adjustable. When I called the FSDO, he said send the updated 8130-6, but no need to go back to Phase 1
I noted that in the logbook, and of course I flew it for a few hours by myself anyway.
__________________
Dennis Glaeser CFII
Rochester Hills, MI
RV-7A - Eggenfellner H6, GRT Sport ES, EIS4000, 300XL, SL30, TT Gemini, PMA6000, AK950L, GT320,
uAvionixEcho ADSB in/out with GRT Safe Fly GPS
|

08-12-2009, 08:34 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shallotte NC
Posts: 594
|
|
Got the exact same response as Bill.....
from the Greensboro FSDO regarding a Catto swap from my metal Sesenich. 8130-6, letter of intent, 5 hours phase 1, and projected test area. Got to be the first time I have ever heard the same exact procedure come from 2 different FSDO's
Wow.....
Hey Bill, you gonna stay with the 290??
Regards,
Chris
__________________
Chris Schmitt
Shallotte, NC
RV9A 90970 N614RV
Sold to nice folks in Texas and badly missed.
RV9 in progress
|

08-12-2009, 08:38 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
|
|
Be Sure!
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGlaeser
I switched from a ground adjustable Sensenich, to an IVO Magnum in-flight adjustable. When I called the FSDO, he said send the updated 8130-6, but no need to go back to Phase 1
I noted that in the logbook, and of course I flew it for a few hours by myself anyway.
|
Please read your operating limitations carefully. Changing to a controllable pitch prop normally requires a minimum of 5 hours of phase I flight testing. The FSDO does not have the authority to override your operating limitations. They have the authority to revise them, but until they do, you are bound by what your operating limitations say.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Last edited by Mel : 08-12-2009 at 09:10 AM.
|

08-12-2009, 08:53 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 878
|
|
I'll double check...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel
Please read your operating limitations carefully. Changing to a controllable pitch prop normally requires a phase I flight test. The FSDO does not have the authority to override your operating limitations.
|
I'll double check what they say. I actually did the flight testing, but I'll have to be sure it's documented correctly in the log.
I never got a response from the FSDO regarding the change - is that a problem?
__________________
Dennis Glaeser CFII
Rochester Hills, MI
RV-7A - Eggenfellner H6, GRT Sport ES, EIS4000, 300XL, SL30, TT Gemini, PMA6000, AK950L, GT320,
uAvionixEcho ADSB in/out with GRT Safe Fly GPS
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 AM.
|