VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-05-2009, 05:20 PM
scard's Avatar
scard scard is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 3,152
Default '09 Condition Inspection complete

(mostly a repost from my build log)
Tanya and I finished up the '09 condition inspection. It looks like it takes us about 40 hours to properly complete a full condition inspection on this plane. We are almost exactly equal parts labor at this point. No major issues were found. Brakes and new Dresser retread tires are wearing great. They were installed in October '08 and now have over 200 hours. The brakes look almost new. The first rotation of the tires have at least another 300 hours available on the first side. I finally found the source of a little pesky oil leak. It is at the forward right side of the oil sump at the assembly flange. It looks like I'll be pulling the sump and putting a new gasket etc. on sometime when it is cooler out.

With everything buttoned up and proper log book entries made, today we went up and did a test flight. I treat this kind of flight like a loaded gun that could kill us at any time. Just like Phase I. I made it clear to the tower that this was an experimental test flight and that we would be climbing in the pattern to orbit the field at 6500'. They asked if I wanted radar service up there with Austin. I didn't, because I had plans to do a bunch of systems and electrical testing involving shutting everything down in flight at altitude over the field. They agreed that I would just stay with the tower frequency (way) above. Up we went, keeping it nice and tight over the field. We were long since above the class D airspace by downwind. We did a pretty continuous sequence of functional tests for almost 45 minutes. Part of this included incrementally shutting down all parts of the electrical system to refresh our expectations of how things behave. We have a lot of "whiz-bang" toys in this airplane, but I think it is important to actually demonstrate that the whole thing doesn't just fall out of the sky running on only one mag and the instrument panel all off. That is what we did. Demonstrated flight with all electrical off, efis reboot in flight, electronic ignition off... Things get very simple real quick. While we were at it, this was a good time to introduce Tanya to flying with the engine completely shut down (mixture pulled off). We were just a big RV glider for a couple of minutes. Tanya set it up and pulled the mixture and just flew the airplane. "It flies just fine" she commented. You can hardly tell it isn't running except for the decent rate to maintain airspeed and the lack of idle popping in the exhaust pipes. The mixture is put back in and we have power again. Note that we set this up in perfect position to spiral directly down onto the numbers of the active runway if for some reason the power didn't return. These are good exercises for us that I think work well with the conclusion of our annual condition inspection. Smooth skies they weren't in the 102 degree heat.
__________________
Scott Card
CQ Headset by Card Machine Works
CMW E-Lift
RV-9A N4822C flying 2200+hrs. / Cedar Park, TX
RV8 Building - fuselage / showplanes canopy (Done!)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-05-2009, 07:09 PM
erich weaver's Avatar
erich weaver erich weaver is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: santa barbara, CA
Posts: 1,681
Default

Good stuff Scott - I gotta do more of this type of testing, so that when something bad happens its not such a shock. Gonna try that in-flight EFIS reboot next flight

In that same vein, I recently added something to my pre-flight check list that I previously hadnt been doing: Check that the essential avionics function when the master is off and the E-bus alternate feed path switch is turned on (from the Nuckoll's Aero-electric school of aircraft wiring). Would suck to find out it didnt work when you really needed it...

erich
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-05-2009, 07:46 PM
scard's Avatar
scard scard is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 3,152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by erich weaver View Post
Good stuff Scott - I gotta do more of this type of testing, so that when something bad happens its not such a shock. Gonna try that in-flight EFIS reboot next flight

In that same vein, I recently added something to my pre-flight check list that I previously hadnt been doing: Check that the essential avionics function when the master is off and the E-bus alternate feed path switch is turned on (from the Nuckoll's Aero-electric school of aircraft wiring). Would suck to find out it didnt work when you really needed it...

erich
Yeah, sometimes the inflight demonstration to the pilots is really necessary compared to the ground ops theory. Just as long as the safety plan is well at hand and secure. Control surfaces don't evaporate quite as fast as electrons. Test physical control surfaces first, then electrons.
__________________
Scott Card
CQ Headset by Card Machine Works
CMW E-Lift
RV-9A N4822C flying 2200+hrs. / Cedar Park, TX
RV8 Building - fuselage / showplanes canopy (Done!)
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:27 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.