VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Education > Formation Flying
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-10-2009, 09:01 AM
banzaisgi banzaisgi is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: pensacola and cape coral fla
Posts: 1
Default formation flight complaints

I'm doing an article.
1. legal complaints about formation flight in congested areas (someone says that a formation/gaggle over the everglades is unsafe)
2. what is congested area defined
3. is a loose gaggle/formation truly a formation
4. are photos taken from the ground admissable
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-10-2009, 09:32 AM
Kahuna's Avatar
Kahuna Kahuna is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gold Hill, NC25
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by banzaisgi View Post
I'm doing an article.
1. legal complaints about formation flight in congested areas (someone says that a formation/gaggle over the everglades is unsafe)
2. what is congested area defined
3. is a loose gaggle/formation truly a formation
4. are photos taken from the ground admissable
Ok Ill bite.
1. You have 3 different all unrelated items that can not be addressed together. Formation safety has nothing to do with whats under you. Legal complaints? I dont know what that is. Formation and congestion are not related either in a regulatory fashion, or in the formation flight it self.
2. A congested area is what ever the ruling FAA atty says it is and what ever you are willing to defend in a case. While there is much case law on the matter, the regs are weak and the case law is all over the place. It is what ever the inspector talks the atty into saying it is. And i can tell you from first hand experience, a remote uncontrolled airport with nothing for miles has been deemed congested in the cases. Some have won, some have lost.
3. In whos mind? The flights mind? The FAA's mind? While the FAA has used <500' as a litmus test for formation. Other circumstances are considered. There are countless times and circumstances you are <500' apart and are not considered a formation from the FAA. If a flight is acting like a formation and they are further apart than 500', then they are in fact in formation. In terms of acting, the circumstances of the flight, the intentions of the pilots, and other tangental information(squawks, briefings, communications, etc.) can be used to determine if the gaggle is in fact a flight or not.
4. Absolutely.

I would add that I could easily come up with lots of circumstances where a formation flight over any space, including the everglades, could be unsafe. The safely of the flight has nothing to do with the ground below. Ill bet there have been many unsafe gaggles over the everglades, and countless other locations. The question of safety has everthing to do with the training, attitude, and dicipline of the flight, and nothing to do with swamp below.

Best,
__________________
Kahuna
6A, S8 ,
Gold Hill, NC25

Last edited by Kahuna : 06-10-2009 at 09:54 AM. Reason: edits
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:42 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.