|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

05-02-2009, 07:04 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,768
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vernhendershott
Now that there are very few DAR's with authority 47 required to approve the ELSA aircraft.....
|
I'm not sure how many DARs actually have function code 47. But I can say if they don't have it, it's probably because they don't want it. When light-sport aircraft were first defined everyone who had function code 46 (experimental amateur-built) was offered FC 47 just for the asking. Some wanted it and some didn't.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
|

05-02-2009, 07:13 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,768
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by todehnal
The 8000.38 document is a bit daunting for the run of the mill 12 builder. Van has provided some documentation in the RV-12 prints/manual that does support E-AB. There is a parts list that list each part, by name and number, and identifies it as "material", or "manufactured", as the case may be. This should go a long way in supporting an E-AB qualifying project. That, along with a good builders log, and DAR's like you, who are willing to support that effort, will go a long way in preserving the privilages of us home builders and our passion.
|
Thanks Tom, Yes the form can be intimidating. But actually we don't use the 8000-38 real often. If a kit is on the list, we don't need it. Many kits that aren't on the list are very obviously over the 51%. But with a new kit like the RV-12, it can be very close. Those are the ones we have to be careful with.
The closest I have ever come to rejecting a kit is the "Texas Sport" (kit version of the Legend Cub). We actually had to work with the manufacturer and make a few changes in the kit to get it to qualify.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
|

08-09-2011, 10:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New London, NC (near Charlotte), Boulder, CO
Posts: 271
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carol Carpenter
I attend a Van's forum while at Sun N Fun. Very few Van's RV 12 builders at the show realized the huge advantage of certifying the RV 12 as ELSA over Amateur built. There is a 30-30% high resale value when a plane is certified as ELSA. After resale the new owner can take a short two day course and will be able to complete the yearly condition inspection. With amateur built he would need an A & P.
While you must build the aircraft exactly as the S-LSA model- after certification you can modify the aircraft. The operating limits on both are exactly the same.
|
But can you legally modify an ELSA after certification? --Jerre
|

08-10-2011, 05:48 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Elkton, Md.
Posts: 1,652
|
|
Hi Dog, I was told by the DAR that performed my inspection that modifications not expressly approved by Van's will create an insurance and personal liability issue. This situation will give the insurance co. grounds to deny claims as well as placing your assets and estate at risk. Just stating what I was told.
__________________
Wag Aero Sport Trainer built,sold and wrecked
N588DF RV12 #336 built, sold and alive and well in New York
N73DF RV12 #244 built, sold and alive and well in Florida
N91 RV RV9 I wish I could say I built this one! Mark Santoleri hit the ball out of the park on this gem.
Currently restoring a 1978 Citabria GCBC
|

08-10-2011, 07:28 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Riley TWP MI
Posts: 3,070
|
|
FAA says it is ok to modify E-LSA
Quote:
|
But can you legally modify an ELSA after certification? --Jerre
|
Yes you can and many builders have.
The FAA Aviation News dated Nov / Dec 2006 says, "Modification of the ?light-sport kit? aircraft can be at will after original certification."
Read it on page 32 (pdf page 34), right hand column:
http://www.faa.gov/news/aviation_new...novdec2006.pdf
Also, read this thread:
http://www.vansairforce.com/communit...t=57922&page=2
There will be a liability issue no matter how the aircraft is registered or modified. Insurance companies routinely insure E-AB aircraft. A modified E-LSA aircraft will not have more of an insurance risk than a similarly modified E-AB.
Joe Gores
|

08-10-2011, 08:47 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Spring Hill Fl
Posts: 734
|
|
16 hour Class ??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mich48041
Yes you can and many builders have.
The FAA Aviation News dated Nov / Dec 2006 says, "Modification of the ?light-sport kit? aircraft can be at will after original certification."
Read it on page 32 (pdf page 34), right hand column:
http://www.faa.gov/news/aviation_new...novdec2006.pdf
Also, read this thread:
http://www.vansairforce.com/communit...t=57922&page=2
There will be a liability issue no matter how the aircraft is registered or modified. Insurance companies routinely insure E-AB aircraft. A modified E-LSA aircraft will not have more of an insurance risk than a similarly modified E-AB.
Joe Gores
|
Joe
I would like to know if there is any limitation to the Modifications
Can you change the type of?
1. Engine
2. Wing
3. Fuel tanks
4. Landing gear
If a Person builds a Kit and changes some element of the aircraft that is one thing.
A Person who buys an RV12 finished aircraft and wants to redesign it after only 16 hours of school is totally different thing.
The non-builder that took a 16 hour class I will never fly with.
My view
|

08-10-2011, 09:08 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 669
|
|
As I understand it ...
I think if you build E-LSA, even though you might add lights and IFR instrumentation, you can't fly IFR or at night.
On the other hand, I think if you build E-AB and include that equipment, your program letter will allow for both. On the day you don't want to visit the sawbones any longer, you just stop flying IFR & night, and that's pretty much all you have to do. (Just limit yourself to sport pilot operations in an aircraft that meets the prescribed requirements.)
The Repairman / Inspection privileges are different. I think it works so that in E-LSA, you can sell the airplane and the new owner can get a certificate. With E-AB, there will only be one certificate ever issued - the successor owner would have to hire a A&P for just the condition inspection (but not for maintenance).
The consensus seems to be that once the E-LSA airworthiness certificate is issued, you can change anything but that it has to conform to the S-LSA prototype at the time of inspection. I'm pretty sure the operating limitations will specify when to notify the FSDO relative to changes. Just my opinion - if you're thinking of changes that entail Engine, Wing, Fuel tanks and / or Landing Gear, when you run the numbers, you might see it more advantageous to just build it E-AB to begin with. As to the conceptual value difference of E-LSA vs. E-AB, it ought to be somewhere near the present value of about 5 condition inspections, this number being reduced by the value of additional utility (such as night, IFR, etc.). Seems like it would work out to be pretty close.
YMMV - me, I'm waiting for Katie B. to update on the Jab 2200 FWF kit and what plans there might be for a Jab 3300 FWF kit.
|

08-10-2011, 09:11 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minden, NV
Posts: 145
|
|
I asked a similar question in my 16 hour ELSA inspection course and was told that an ELSA(special airworthyness certificate, experimental operating light sport) cannot be taken out of compliance with its LSA requirements. I don't recall the regulation that was cited, but it seemed reasonable to me.
__________________
Andy Johnson
RV-12: Oshkosh 2012 "Outstanding Workmanship"
RV-6: Bought Flying - "She's a good ole bird"
-PAID 2014-
|

08-10-2011, 09:12 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Hillboro, OR
Posts: 167
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanBaier
As I understand it ...
I think if you build E-LSA, even though you might add lights and IFR instrumentation, you can't fly IFR or at night.
On the other hand, I think if you build E-AB and include that equipment, your program letter will allow for both. On the day you don't want to visit the sawbones any longer, you just stop flying IFR & night, and that's pretty much all you have to do. (Just limit yourself to sport pilot operations in an aircraft that meets the prescribed requirements.)
The Repairman / Inspection privileges are different. I think it works so that in E-LSA, you can sell the airplane and the new owner can get a certificate. With E-AB, there will only be one certificate ever issued - the successor owner would have to hire a A&P for just the condition inspection (but not for maintenance).
The consensus seems to be that once the E-LSA airworthiness certificate is issued, you can change anything but that it has to conform to the S-LSA prototype at the time of inspection. I'm pretty sure the operating limitations will specify when to notify the FSDO relative to changes. Just my opinion - if you're thinking of changes that entail Engine, Wing, Fuel tanks and / or Landing Gear, when you run the numbers, you might see it more advantageous to just build it E-AB to begin with. As to the conceptual value difference of E-LSA vs. E-AB, it ought to be somewhere near the present value of about 5 condition inspections, this number being reduced by the value of additional utility (such as night, IFR, etc.). Seems like it would work out to be pretty close.
YMMV - me, I'm waiting for Katie B. to update on the Jab 2200 FWF kit and what plans there might be for a Jab 3300 FWF kit.
|
The E-LSA CAN be night capable, just by adding the light kit. Night VFR isn't a problem. The same applies to IFR. You seem to be confused on the 'consensus'. The only thing that you are limited by when making changes is ensuring it doesn't leave the 'LSA' guidelines (too fast, stall too fast, increase gross weight, etc). Just like an E-AB, there is no requirement to tell the FSDO ANYTHING at any point. After inspection, the E-AB and E-LSA are nearly identical besides the annuals, and the weight/speed limitations.
However, you'd be a fool to exceed the weight/speed limits on the RV-12 anyway, since the airframe is designed with those numbers in mind.
__________________
RV-12: 331RV
Started 3/31/10
First Flight: 4/2/11
|

08-10-2011, 09:17 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Riley TWP MI
Posts: 3,070
|
|
Limit to modifications
Quote:
|
I would like to know if there is any limitation to the Modifications
|
Mel is more qualified to answer that question. In my opinion, there is no limit. However, no modification should be made to an E-LSA that would cause the aircraft to no longer meet the definition of LSA.
Quote:
|
A Person who buys an RV12 finished aircraft and wants to redesign it after only 16 hours of school is totally different thing.
|
I hear you. But anyone is allowed to work on an experimental plane, even the inexperienced amateur car mechanic who lives down the street. And an E-LSA IS an experimental aircraft. Some A&Ps are reluctant to inspect experimental aircraft because they do not know who has worked on it or what unsafe modifications were made.
Joe Gores
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:51 AM.
|