VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-20-2009, 08:23 PM
Aviator168 Aviator168 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Massapequa,NY
Posts: 115
Default Deburring, fluting, and countersink dimples.

Between the standard kit and QB kit, is there a lot of extra work in these areas?

Last edited by Aviator168 : 04-20-2009 at 08:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-20-2009, 09:05 PM
scard's Avatar
scard scard is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 3,152
Default

Uh, Yeah... Big difference in the number of operation repetitions for those three(?) operations between standard build and QB.
__________________
Scott Card
CQ Headset by Card Machine Works
CMW E-Lift
RV-9A N4822C flying 2200+hrs. / Cedar Park, TX
RV8 Building - fuselage / showplanes canopy (Done!)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-21-2009, 11:26 AM
flion's Avatar
flion flion is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 2,647
Default

If you mean the total amount, then yes - every rivet already done has already had all the deburring and countersinking/dimpling done. Structural formers (ribs/bulkheads) will already have been fluted. However, those operations are not completed for the parts you do. You may also find you need to flute some more on installed parts to get skins to lay just right. Edge deburring will also not be done on the parts you install though you can safely assume it's already done on the pre-built parts.

I guess I wonder what is behind the question. Do you not enjoy doing these simple but repetitive tasks? If so, then maybe you should reevaluate your commitment to building. I don't mean that in a harsh way; not everyone is a builder and you might be happier purchasing a plane already built. If you only have the building bug to a slight degree, than perhaps reworking a flying or nearly-flying RV (everyone has their own idea of ideal equipment and mods) would satisfy you better. Me, I just bought a slow-build RV-10 kit because I just can't seem to get enough of twirling that little countersink deburring tool around - who's the crazy one here?
__________________
Patrick Kelley - Flagstaff, AZ
RV-6A N156PK - Flying too much to paint
RV-10 14MX(reserved) - Fuselage on gear
http://www.mykitlog.com/flion/
EAA Technical Counselor #5357
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-21-2009, 07:48 PM
Aviator168 Aviator168 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Massapequa,NY
Posts: 115
Default

Not at all Pat. Just wanted to know if the QB kit is worth the time saving if enough time is put aside for the project. Look, it is 10 grand and I can use that for better avionics.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-23-2009, 02:05 PM
rv7charlie rv7charlie is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pocahontas MS
Posts: 3,884
Default

An estimate I've heard from several sources (could probably vary by at least an order of magnitude either way depending on who is building) is that the QB price reflects about $8/hour of build time.

Charlie
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-23-2009, 07:18 PM
Aviator168 Aviator168 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Massapequa,NY
Posts: 115
Default

I guess it is very difficult to find out unless one actually had built both. If that estimate is close to accurate, the QB kit is worth it. For me at least.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:44 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.